Cutmarks andpost-mortem striations in fossil human teeth
- 29 Downloads
- 22 Citations
Abstract
A sample of 24 teeth from 10 human fossils have been examined by Scanning Electron Microscope. Large striations attributable to feeding behavior (dental cutmarks) and/or topost-mortem damage have been found in five of the specimens (Broken Hill, Tabun I, Skhul 4, La Quina 5 and Malarnaud). At high magnification, it is possible to observe differences between the internal morphology of these structures andpost-mortem striations that were probably inadvertently made during the process of study and cleaning the fossil remains. Cutmarks can be related to the behavior of placing meat or other matter between the anterior teeth while cutting pieces of it with a stone tool. The presence of this type of scratching on the enamel surface of teeth might be indirectly used as indicative of meat consumption.
Key words
Fossil teeth Cutmarks artificial striations Scanning Electron Microscopy Buccal surfacePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- Bermúdez de Castro, J.M., Bromage, T.G. and Fernández Jalvo, Y., 1988. Buccal striations on fossil human anterior teeth: evidence of handedness in the middle and early Upper Pleistocene.Journal of Human Evolution., 17: 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bromage, T.G. and Boyde, A. 1984. Microscopic criteria for the determination of direcionality of cutmarks on bone.American Journal of Physical Anthropolgy. 65: 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Poncins G, 1941.Kabloona. New York, Reynal and Hitchcock.Google Scholar
- Gordon K.R., 1984. Microfracture patterns of abrasive wear striations on teeth indicate directionality.American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 63: 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koby F.E., 1956. Une incisive Néandertalienne trouvé en Suisse.Verdhandlungen der Naturforschers Gesellschaft in Basal 67: 1–15.Google Scholar
- Lalueza C., 1992. Information Obtained from the Microscopic Examination of Cultural Striations.International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. No 2: 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lalueza C. and Pérez-Pérez A., 1993. The diet of the Neanderthal Child Gibraltar 2 (Devil's Tower) through the study of the vestibular striation pattern.Journal of Human Evolution. 24, (1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lalueza C., Pérez-Pérez A. and Turbón D., 1993. Microscopic study of the Banyoles' Mandible (Girona, Spain): diet, cultural activity and toothpick use.Journal of Human Evolution. 24, (3): 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lumley M.A. de, 1973. Anténéandertaliens et Néandertaliens du Bassin Mediterranéen Occidental Européen.Etud. Quat., Mém. 2.Google Scholar
- Martin H., 1923.L'Homme fossile de la Quina. Paris: Doin.Google Scholar
- Patte E., 1960. Découverte d'un Néandertalien dans la Vienne.Anthropologie. 64: 512–517.Google Scholar
- Puech P.-F., 1978. L'alimentation de l'homme préhistoríque.La Recherche. 94: 1029–1031.Google Scholar
- Puech P.-F., Albertini H. and Mills N.T.W., 1980. Dental destruction in Broken Hill Man.Journal of Human Evolution., 9:33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryan A.S. and Johanson D.C., 1989. Anterior dental microwear inAustralopithecus afarensis: comparisons with human and nonhuman primates.Journal of Human Evolution. 18: 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shipman P. and Rose J., 1984. Cutmark mimics on modern and fossil bovid bones.Current Anthropology. 25: 116–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trinkaus E., 1983.The Shanidar Neandertals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Vanstone J. W., 1962.Point Hope: An Eskimo Village in Transition. Seattle. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar