Advertisement

Human Evolution

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 205–216 | Cite as

Cranial capacity in hominid evolution

  • R. Stanyon
  • S. Consigliere
  • M. A. Morescalchi
Article

Abstract

We present an analysis of cranial capacity of 118 hominid crania available from the literature. The crania belong to both the genusAustralopithecus andHomo and provide a clear outline of hominid cranial evolution starting at more than 3 million years ago. Beginning withA. afarensis there is a clear increase in both absolute and relative brain size with every successive time period.H.s. neandertal has an absolutely and relatively smaller brain size (1412cc, E.Q.=5.6) than fossil modernH.s. sapiens (1487cc, E.Q.=5.9). Three evolutionary models of hominid brain evolution were tested: gradualism, punctuated equilibrium, and a mixed model using both gradualism and punctuated equilibrium. Both parametric and non-parametric analyses show a clear trend toward increasing brain size withH. erectus and a possible relationship within archaicH. sapiens. An evolutionary stasis in cranial capacity could not be refuted for all other taxa. Consequently, the mixed model appears to more fully explain hominid cranial capacity evolution. However, taxonomic decisions could directly compromise the possibility of testing the evolutionary mechanisms hypothesized to be operating in hominid brain expansion.

Key words

Brain size Encephalization Quotient gradualism punctuated equilibrium taxonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arsuaga J.L., Martinez, I., Gracia, A., Carretero, J.M., & Carbonell, E., 1993. Three new human skulls from the Sima de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene site in Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain.Nature, 362: 534–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beals K.L., Smith C.L. & Dodd S.M., 1984. Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines.Current Anthropology 25: 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenberg B., 1983. The evolution of the advanced hominid brain.Current Anthropology 24: 589–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bräuer G., 1989. The evolution of modern humans: a comparison of the African and non African evidence. In Mellars P. & Stringer C. (eds), 1989.The human revolution, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp 123–154.Google Scholar
  5. Bunney S., 1986. Did neanderthal babies have bigger brains than ours?New Scientist 110: 28–30.Google Scholar
  6. Clark G.A. & Lindly J.M., 1989. The case of continuity: observations on the biocultural transition in Europe and Western Asia. In Mellars P. & Stringer C. (eds), 1989.The human revolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 123–154.Google Scholar
  7. Clark J.D., 1989. The origins and spread of modern humans: a broad perspective on the African evidence. In Mellars P. & Stringer C. (eds) 1989.The human revolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 565–588.Google Scholar
  8. Cronin J.E., Boaz N.T., Stringer C.B. & Rak Y., 1981. Tempo and mode in hominid evolution.Nature 292: 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darwin 1871.The descent of man. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
  10. Dubois E., 1898. Remarks upon the brain cast ofPithecanthropus erectus. Proc. IVth Int. Congr. Zool. Cambridge, pp. 85–86.Google Scholar
  11. Eldredge N. & Gould S.J., 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Schopf T.J.M. (ed),Models in paleobiology, San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Co., pp. 82–115.Google Scholar
  12. Falk D., 1985. Hadar AL 162-28 endocast as evidence that brain enlargement preceded cortical reorganization in hominid evolution.Nature 313: 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falk D., 1987a. Brain lateralization in primates and its evolution in hominids.Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 30: 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falk, D. & S. Kasinga, 1983. Cranial capacity of a female robust australopithecinie (KNM-ER 407) from Kenya.J. Hum. Evol. 12: 515–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gambier D., 1989. Fossil hominids from the early Upper Palaeolithic (Aurignacian) of France. In Mellars P. & Stringer C. (eds), 1989.The human revolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 194–211.Google Scholar
  16. Godfrey and Jacobs, 1981. Gradulism, autocatalytic and punctuational models of hominid brain evolution: a cautionary tale.J. Human Evol. 10: 255–272.Google Scholar
  17. Gould, 1981.The mismeasure of man. New York WW Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Groves C.P., 1989.A theory of human and primate evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Habgood P.J., 1989a. An investigation into the usefulness of a cladistic approach to the study of the origin of anatomically modern humans.Hum. Evol. 4: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Habgood P.J., 1989b. The origin of anatomically-modern humans in Australia. In Mellars P. & Stringer C. (eds). 1989. The human revolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 245–273.Google Scholar
  21. Henneberg M., 1987. Hominid cranial capacity change through time: a darwinian process.Hum. Evol. 2: 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henneberg, M., 1989. Morphological and geological dating of early hominid fossils compared. Current Anthropol. 30: 527–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holloway R.L., 1988b. Brain. In Tattersal I., Delson E. & Van Couvering J. (eds), 1988.Encyclopedia of Hum. Evol. and prehistory. New York: Garland Publishing, Tattersal et al. (eds), pp. 98–105.Google Scholar
  24. Holloway R.L., 1975. Early hominid endocast: volumes, morphology and significance in hominid evolution. In Tuttle, R.H. (ed.)Primate functional morphology and evolution, L'Aja: Mouton, pp. 393–415.Google Scholar
  25. Holloway R.L., 1978. Problems of brain endocast interpretation and African hominid evolution. In Jolly C.J. (ed),Early hominids of Africa, New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 379–401.Google Scholar
  26. Holloway R.L., 1980a. The OH 7 (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania) hominid partial brain endocast revisited.Am. J. Phy. Anthro. 53: 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holloway R.L., 1980b. Indonesian “Solo” (Ngadong) endocranial reconstructions: some preliminary observations and comparisons with neandertal andHomo erectus groups.Am. J. Phys. Anthro. 53: 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holloway R.L., 1981a. The indonesianHomo erectus brain endocasts revisited. Am. J. Phy. Anthro. 55: 503–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holloway R.L., 1981b. Volumetric and assymetry determinations on recent hominid endocasts: Spy I and II, Djebel Ihroud and the SaléHomo erectus specimens, with some notes on neandertal brain size.Am. J. Phy. Anthro., 55: 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holloway R.L., 1983. Cerebral brain endocast ofAustralopithecus afarensis.Nature 303: 420–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holloway R.L. 1985. The poor brain ofHomo sapiens neanderthalensis: see what you please. In Ancestors: The hard evidence pp 319–324.Google Scholar
  32. Jerison H.J., 1973.Evolution of the brain and intelligence. New York, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jungers W.L., 1988. Lucy's length: stature recontruction inAustralopithecus afarensis (A.L.288-1) with implications for other small bodied hominids. Am. J. Phy. Anthro. 76: 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klein R.G., 1989 a.The human career: human biological and cultural origins. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Leakey R.E.F. & Walker A., 1988. NewAustralopithecus boisei specimens from East and West Lake Turkana, Kenya.Am. J. Phy. Anthro. 76: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leakey L.S.B., Tobias, P.V. & J.R. Napier, 1964. A new species of the genusHomo from the Olduvai GorgeNature 202.Google Scholar
  37. Leigh S.R., 1992. Cranial capacity evolution inHomo erectus and earlyHomo sapiens.Am. J. Phy. Anthro. 87: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lynn R., 1990. The evolution of brain size and intelligence in man.Hum. Evol. 5: 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, 1990. Primate origins and evolution:A phylogenetic reconstruction. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  40. McCown T.D. & Keith, 1939.The stone age of Monte Carmel, vol. 2. The fossil human remains from the Levalloiso-Mousterian. Oxford: The Clarendon Press (cit. in Miller 1991).Google Scholar
  41. McHenry H.M., 1991a. Femoral lengths and stature in Plio-Pleistocene hominids.Am. J. Phy. Anthro. 85:149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McHenry H.M., 1991b. Petite bodies of the “robust” australopithecines.Am. J. Phys. Anthro. 86: 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McHenry H.M., 1992a. Body size and proportions in early hominids.Am. J. Phys. Anthro. 87: 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McHenry H.M., 1992b. How big were early hominids?,Evolutionary Anthropology 1: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller J.A., 1991. Does brain size variability provide evidence of multiple species inHomo habilis? Am. J. Phys. Anthro. 84: 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pope G.G., 1988. Sambungmachan. In Tattersal I., Delson E. & Van Couvering J. (eds), 1988. Encyclopedia of Hum. Evol. and prehistory. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 503.Google Scholar
  47. Rightmire P.G., 1990. The evolution ofHomo erectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sergi S., 1948. The palaeanthropi in Italy: the fossil men of Saccopastore and Circeo. Man 48: 61–79 (cit. in Miller 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stringer C.B., 1986. The credibility ofHomo habilis. In Wood B., Martin L. & Andrews P. (eds),Major topics in primate and Hum. Evol., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.266–294.Google Scholar
  50. Stringer C.B., 1989a. Documenting the origins of modern humans. In Trinkaus E. (ed), 1989 a, pp.67–96.Google Scholar
  51. Stringer C.B., 1989b. The origin of early modern humans: a comparison of the European and non-European evidence. In Mellars P. & Stringer C. (eds), 1989.The human revolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Suzuki H. & Takai F., 1970. The Amud man and his cave site. Tokyo: Keigaku Publishing Co. (cit. in Miller 1991).Google Scholar
  53. Tobias P.V. 1964. The Olduvai bed I hominine with special reference to brain and speech.Pontificiae Acad. Scient. Scripta Varia 50: 85–140.Google Scholar
  54. Tobias P.V., 1971. The brain in hominid evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tobias, P.V., 1983.Recent advances in the evolution of the Hominids with special reference to brain and speech Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia 50:85–140.Google Scholar
  56. Tobias, P.V., 1987. The brain ofHomo habilis: a new level of organization in cerebral evolution.J. Hum. Evol. 16: 741–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trinkaus E., 1990. Cladistic and the hominid fossil record.Am. J. Phys. Anthro. 83: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trinkaus E., 1989. Issues concerning human emergence in the later Pleistocene. In Trinkaus (ed) 1989.The emergence of modern humans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  59. Valladas H., Joron J.L., Valladas, G., Arensburg B., Bar-Yosef C., Belfer-Cohen A., Goldberg P., Laville H., Meignen L., Rak Y., Tchernov E., Tillier A.-M. & Vandermeersch B., 1987. Thermoluminescence dates for the Neanderthal burial site at Kebara in Israel.Nature 330: 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vandermeersch B., 1989. The evolution of modern humans: recente evidence from Southwest Asia. In Mellars P. & Stringer C. (eds), 1989a.The human revolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 155–164.Google Scholar
  61. Vleck E., 1955. The fossil man of Gànovce, Czechoslovachia.J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 85: 163–171 (cit. in Miller 1991).Google Scholar
  62. Weidenreich F., 1943. The skull ofSinanthropus pekinensis: a comparative study on a primitive hominid skull. Palaentologica Sinica, new ser. D., n. 10, whole series 127: 1–484 (cit. in Miller 1991).Google Scholar
  63. Williams B.J., 1987. Is there a conflict between neo-darwinian evolutionary theory and the fossil record?Am. J. Phy. Anthro. 73: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolpoff M.H., 1980. Cranial remains of Middle Pleistocene European hominids.J. Hum. Evol. 9: 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woo J.K., 1966. The skull of Lantian man.Curr. Anthro. 7: 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wood B., 1992. Origin and evolution of the genusHomo.Nature 355: 783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu R. & Dong X., 1982. Preliminary study ofHomo erectus remains from Hexian, Hanui.Acta Anthropol. Sin. 1: 2–13 (cit. in Miller 1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Stanyon
    • 1
  • S. Consigliere
    • 1
  • M. A. Morescalchi
    • 2
  1. 1.Istituto di Antropologia fisicaUniversità di GenovaGenovaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Biologia AnimaleUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations