An attempt has been made to estimate male and female Egyptian stature from long bone length usingTrotter &Gleser negro stature formulae, previous work by the authors having shown that these rather than white formulae give more consistent results with male dynastic material. Evidence is presented that the tibia length should include the spine in the later (1958) formulae and should exclude it in the earlier (1952) formulae. It is also shown that better results are obtained if the constants in the stature formulae are modified so as to conform more exactly with the basic data published byTrotter &Gleser. When consistency has been achieved in this way, predynastic, proportions are founded to be such that distal segments of the limbs are even longer in relation to the proximal segments than they are in modern negroes. Such proportions are termed «super-negroid».
Key wordsstature predynastic Ancient Egyptians «supernegroid» proportions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brothwell D. R., 1981. Digging up Bones (3rd ed.). London and Oxford: British Museum, (Natural History) and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Formicola V., 1983.Stature in Italian prehistoric samples, with particular reference to methodological problems. Homo, 34: 33–47.Google Scholar
- Knight I., 1984. The Heights and Weights of Adults in Great Britain. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Pearson K., 1899.Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution 5. On the reconstruction of the stature of prehistoric races. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A., 192: 169–244.Google Scholar
- Robins G., 1983.Natural and canonical proportions in ancient Egyptians. Göttinger Miszellen, 61: 17–25.Google Scholar
- Robins G. &Shute C. C. D., 1984.Estimating living stature from female skeletal remains. Göttinger Miszellen, 83: 71–76.Google Scholar
- Warren E., 1897.An investigation of the variability of the human skeleton: with special reference to the Naqada race discovered by Professor Flinders Petrie in his explorations in Egypt. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London. B., 189: 135–227.Google Scholar