Human Evolution

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 29–45

An overview of the geographic and chronologic distribution of west European cercopithecoids

  • G. Ardito
  • A. Mottura
Article

Abstract

Four genera of fossil cercopithecoid monkeys have been recorded from Miocene and Plio-Pleistocene deposits of West Europe: the subfamilyColobinae is represented byMesopithecus andDolichopithecus while the subfamilyCercopithecinae is represented byMacaca andParadolichopithecus.

Mesopithecus, Dolichopithecus andParadolichopithecus have not been recorded in “Cromerian” and younger faunas, indicating that they belonged to a more archaic biocoenosis. In contrast, the genusMacaca was apparently able to adapt to the new environment of the middle and late Pleistocene of Europe, being the only primate, along with man, to live in this region, perhaps until very recent times.

Key words

Cercopithecoids Fossil remains Late Cenozoic faunas West Europe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    AA.VV., 1982.Les Premieres Habitants de l'Europe. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. Paris.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AA.VV., 1982.Catalogo mostra “Le Origini dell'Uomo”. Palombi Ed. Roma.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    AA.VV., 1985.Catalogo mostra “I primi abitanti d'Europa”. De Luca Ed. Roma.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adam K. D., 1963.Vom Heppenloch zur Sibyllehoble. Jh. Karst-u Hohlednke, 4, XXXII, 271–285, Munchen.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adam K. D., 1963. Mittelpleistozane Saugetier Fauna aus dem Heppenloch bei Gutenberg (Wurtemberg). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. Ser B, 3: 1–247.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ambrosetti P., 1982.Il significato della mammalofauna nella definizione del Pleistocene medio. In: “Relazione sul Convegno AIQUA 1980”. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat., 5: 243.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ambrosetti P., Cigale Fulgosi F., De Giuli C. & Vialli V., 1980.Mammiferi del Pleistocene inferiore Catalogo Mostra “I Vertebrati Fossili Italiani”, Verona, 217–226.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aguirre E. &Soto E. 1974.Nuevo fossil de Cercopithecido en el Pleistoceno inferior de Puebla De Valverde (Teruel). Estud. Geol., 30: 213–217.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aguirre E. & Fuentes C., 1971.Los vertebratos fosiles de Torralba y Ambrona. Etudes sur le quaternaire dans le monde INQUA VIII Congres Paris 1969.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aguirre E. &Soto E. 1978.Paradolichopithecus in La Puebla de Valverde, Spain: Cercopithecoidea in European Neogene stratigraphy. J. of Hum. evol., 7 (6): 559–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andrews P. &Sutcliffe A.Quoted by.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Azzaroli A., 1946.La Scimmia Fossile della Sardegna. Riv. Sci. Preist., 1: 168–176.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Azzaroli A., 1980.Località fossilifere del Miocene continentale. Catalogo Mostra “I Vertebrati fossili Italiani”, Verona, 195–198.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Azzaroli A., 1980.Mammiferi terrestri del Pliocene. Catalogo Mostra “I Vertebrati Fossili Italiani”, Verona, 211–215.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Azzaroli, A., De Giuli C., Ficarelli G. &Torre D., 1982.Table of the stratigraphic distribution of terrestrial mammalian faunas in Italy from the Pliocene to Early Middle Pleistocene. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat., 5: 55–58.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bartolomei G., 1965.Primo rinvenimento di una Scimmia pleistocenica nell'Italia Settentrionale e considerazioni sul suo significato ecologico. Rendiconti Accad. Naz. Lincei. Ser 8: 39: 533–535.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bartolomei G., 1969.Considerazioni ecologiche sulle faune pleistoceniche dell'Europa contenenti scimmie ed istrici. Scritti sul Quaternario in onore di A. Pasa. Mus. Civ. St. Naturale Verona, 39–52.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bartolomei G., 1982.I Micromammiferi del Plio-Pleistocene. Catalogo Mostra “I Vertebrati Fossili Italiani”, Verona, 249–258.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bernsen J. J., 1930.On a fossil monkey found in the Netherlands (Macacus cf. florentina Cocchi). Proc. Royal Acad. Amsterdam, 33: 771–778.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beyrich H. von, 1861. Uber Semnopithecus pentelicus. Phys. Abh. Kon. Akad. Wiss. Berlin for 1860: 1–26.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bonifay M. F., &Bonifay E., 1963.Un gisement a faune epivillafranchienne a Saint-Esteve-Janson (Bouches-du-Rhone). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 260: 1136–1138.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cocchi I., 1872.Su di due scimmie fossili italiane. Boll. Comitata Geol. d'Italia, 3: 59–71.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Comaschi- Caria I., 1968.Fossili marini e continentali del Quaternario della Sardegna. Atti X Congr. Inter. Studi Sardi, 141–228. Fossataro Cagliari.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crusafont-Pairo M., Aguirre E. & Delson E., in press. Quoted by 27.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Crusafont-Pairo M. &Golpe Posse J. M., 1969.,Los primeros cercopithecidos fosiles de Espana (Nota preliminar). Public Dept. Paleontol. Univ. Barcelona, 15:1–2.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crusafont-Pairo M. & Golpe Posse J. M., 1974.Primates fosiles de Espana. Miscellanea Alcobe, 29–44.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crusafont-Pairo M. &Golpe Posse J. M., 1984.,Nuevo hallazgo de Macaca en Cova Bonica (Gava). Acta Geol. Hisp. t. 19, (1): 29–32.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dehaut E. G., 1911.Animaux Fossiles du cap Figari. Materiaux pour servir a l'histoire Zoologique et Paleontologique des Iles de Corse et de Sardaigne. G. Steinheil, Paris, 3: 53–56.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dehaut E. G., 1914.Nouvelles Recherches sur les mammiferes pleistocenes et Recemment Eteints de la Sardaigne. Materiaux pour servir a l'histoire zoologique et paleontologique des Iles de Corse et de Sardaigne. G. Steinheil, Paris, 5: 71–80.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Delson E., 1971.Estudio preliminar de unos restos de simios pliocenicos procedentes de Cova Bonica (Gava, Prov. Barcelona). Acta Geol. Hispanica, 6: 57.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Delson E., 1974.Preliminary review of cercopithecid distribution in the Circum-mediterranean region. Mem. Bull. Rech. Geol. Min. (France), 78: 131–135.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Delson E., 1975.Evolutionary history of the Cercopithecidae. In: “Approaches to Primate Paleobiology” Vol. 5 Contrib. Primatology (F. S. Szalay ed.), 167–217. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Delson E., 1980.Fossil Macaques, Phyletic Relationships and a scenario of Deployment. In: “The macaques, Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution” (Lindburg. D. G. Ed.), Van Nostrand, New York.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Delson E., & Plopsor D., 1975.Paradolichopithecus, a large, terrestrial monkey (Cercopithecidae, Primates) from the Plio-Pleistocene of Southern Europe and its importance for mammalian biochronology. Proc. Sixth Sess Reg. Comm. Medit. Neogene Startigraphy. Bratislava, 91–96.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deperet C., 1886.Sur l'importance et la duree de la periode pliocene, d'apres l'etude du bassin du Roussillon; nouveau documents pour la faune de mammiferes pliocenes de ce bassin. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 103: 158–160.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deperet C., 1887.Communications sur la presence d'un macaque fossile dans le terrain pliocene moyen de Perpignan. Bull. Soc. d'Anth. Lyon, 6: 40–42.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deperet C., 1889.Sur le Dolichopithecus ruscinensis nouveau singe fossile du Pliocene du Roussillon. C. R. Acad. Sci (Paris), 109: 982–983.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Deperet C., 1890.Les Animaux Pliocenes du Roussillon. Mem. Soc. Geol. Fr. Paleo, 3.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Deperet C., 1929.Dolichopithecus arvernensis Deperet: Nouveau singe du pliocene superieur de Sénèze (Haute-Loire), Trav. Lab. Geol. Lyon, 15: 5–12.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Desio A., 1973.Geologia d'Italia. Utet, Torino.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Forsyth Major C. J., 1872.Notes sur des singes fossiles trouves en Italie, precedee d'un apercu sur les quadrumanes fossiles en general. Atti Soc. It. Sci. Nat., 15: 79–95.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Forsyth Major C. J., 1875.Considerazioni sulla fauna dei mammiferi pliocenici e postpleistocenici della Toscana. Atti Soc. It. Sci. Nat. Pisa, (2): 223–242.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Forsyth Major C. J., 1914.Observations sur la faune des mammiferes quaternaires de la Corse et de la Sardaigne. IX Congr. Internat. Zool. Ser, IV: 594.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Franzen J. L., 1973.Ein Primate aus den altpleistozanen Schneckenmergelen von Hohensulzen (Rheinhessen). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 54: 345–358.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Freudenberg W., 1932.Die Heppenlochfauna und ein weiterer Beleg uber Innus suevicus. Pal. Zeitschr., 14: 126–132.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gaudry A., 1862.Animaux Fossiles et Geologie de l'Attique. F. Savy, Paris.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Genet-Varcin, 1963.Les Singes Actuels et Fossiles. Boubee, Paris.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gervais P., 1849.Zoologie et Paleontologie francaise. I. Bertrand, Paris.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gervais P., 1859.Zoologie et Paleontologie francaises. II. Ed. 2 vols. I. Bertrand, Paris.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gervais P., 1867.Zoologie et Paleontologie generale. I. Bertrand, Paris.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Harle E., 1892.Une mandible de singe du repaire des hyenes de Montsaunès (Haute-Garonne). Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse, 26: 9–11.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Haupt. O., 1935.Andere Wirbeltiere des Neozoikums. In: Salomon-Calvi Oberrheinischer Fossilkatalog Leifg 4 Hefte, 9: 1–103.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hedinger A., 1891.Uber den pliocanen Affen des Heppenlochs. N. Jb. Min. Geol. Palaontol., 1: 169–177.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Heintz E., Delson E., Crusafont M., 1971.Note sur la Macaque de la Puebla de Valverde (Teruel Espana). Boll. R. Soc. Espan. Hist. Nat. (Geol.), 69: 299–302.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Heller F., 1936.Eine oberpliocane Wirbeltierfauna aus Rheinbessen. N. Jb. Min. Geol. Paleontol., Beitrage Abstr., B, 76: 99–160.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hill W. C. O., 1974.Primates. Comparative anatomy and taxonomy. Cynopithecinae: Cercocebus, Macaca, Cynopithecus. Vol. 7, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hinton M. A. C., 1908.Note on the discovery of a bone of a monkey in the Norfolk Forest Bed. Geol. Mag. Ser., V5: 440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hurzeler J., 1967.Nouvelles decouvertes de mammiferes dans les sediments fluviolacustres de Villafranca d'Asti. Problems actuels de paleontologie. Evolution des vertebres. Coll. Intern. Cent. Nat. Rech. Sci. Paris, 163: 633–636.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hurzeler J. &Engesser B., 1976.Les faunes de mammiferes neogenes du Bassin de Baccinello (Grosseto, Italy). C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 283: 333–336.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Issel A., 1892.Liguria Geologica e Preistorica. Vol. II. Donath Ed., Genova.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jolly C. J., 1967.The evolution of the baboon. In: «The Baboon in Medical Research». Vol. II Univ Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Janossy D., 1969.Stratigraphische Auswertung der europaischen mittelpleistozanen Wirbeltierfaune. Ber. Deutsche Ges. Geol. Wiss. A. Geol. Paleontol., 14: 367–438.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kahlke H. D., 1961.Revision der Saugetierfaunen der Klassichen deutschen Pleistozan-Fundstellen van Sussenborn, Mosbach und Tobach. Geologie, 10: 493–518.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kormos T., 1937.Uber die Kleinsauger der Heppenlochfauna. Jber. Mittl. Oberrhein. Geol. Ver. N.F. 26 pp. 88–97 Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kormos T., 1937.Zur frage der abstammung und Herkunft der quartaren Saugetierfauna Europas. In: Festschrift fur Embrik Strand vol. 3 pp. 287–340. Latvia, Riga.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kretzoi M., 1954.Berich uber die Calabrische (Villafranchische) fauna von Kieslang, Kom. Fejer. Foldtani Intezet Evi Jelentese (for 1953), 239–264.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kurten B., 1968.Pleistocene Mammals of Europe. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lapouge G. de, 1894.Note sur un nouveau singe pliocene (Anthropodus rouvillei). Bull. Soc. Sci. Med. Quest., 202–208.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lorentz H. G., 1968.Stratigraphische und mikropalaontologische untersuchungen des braunkohlengebeites von Baccinello. Riv. Ital. Paleontol., 74: 147–270.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lumley H. de, Gagnieres S., Barral L. H Pascal R., 1963.La Grotte du Vallonet. Bull. Mus. Prehist. Monaco, 10: 5–20.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lydekker R., 1896.A geographical history of mammals. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Maglio V., 1975.Pleistocene Faunal Evolution in Africa and Eurasia. In: «After the Australopithecines» Butzer, K. W. and Isaac, G. L. Eds. Mouton, Chicago.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Maier W., 1970.Neue Ergebnisse der systematik und der Stammesgeschichte der Cercopithecoidea. Z. Saugetierkunde, 35: 193–214.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Michaux J., 1966.Sur deux faunules de Micromammiferes dans des assises terminales du Pliocene en Languedoc. C. R. Soc. Geol. France, 9: 343–344.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Michaux J., 1969.Le remplissage karstique de Balaruc. 8th Cong. Intern. Quatern. Assoc. Exc. C-14, Suppl., 1: 1–4.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Necrasav O., Samson P. &Radulesco C., 1961.Sur un nouveau singe catarrhinien fossile decouvert dans un nid fossilifere d'Oltenie. (R.P.R.). Ann. Stiintifice Univ. Al.I. Cuza, Iasi Sec. II Stiinte Naturale, 7: 401–416.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Owen R., 1845.Notice sur la decouverte faite en Angleterre de restes fossiles d'un quadrumane du genre Macaque, dans une formation d'eau douce appartenant au nouveau pliocene. C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 21: 573–575.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Owen R., 1846.A History of British Fossil Mammals and Birds. Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Owen R., 1862. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 57: 240. Quoted In 39.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Portis A., 1917.I primi avanzi di quadrumani del suolo di Roma. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital., 35: 239–278.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ristori G., 1890.Le Scimmie fossili italiane. Boll. R. Com. Geol. Ital. Vol. 1, n. 5-6: 178–196; vol. 1, n. 7-8: 225–234.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Roth J. &Wagner A., 1854.Die fossilen Knochenuberreste von Pikermi in Griechenland. Abh. K. Bayerische Akad. Wiss. 2 Cl., 7: 371–388.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Savage D. E. &Curtis G. H., 1970.The Villafranchian stage-age and its radiometric dating. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Pap., 124: 207–231.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Schaub S., 1943.Die oberpliocaene Saugetierfauna von Seneze (Haute-Loire) und ihre verbreitungeschichtliche Stellung. Eclogae Geol. Helvetica, 36: 270–284.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Schreuder A., 1945. Arch. Neerl. Zool., 7: 153–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Segre A., 1982.Elementi archeologico-preistorici per la definizione del Pleistocene Medio in Italia. a) Il più antico paleolitico d'Italia. Convegno AIQUA 1980. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat., 5: 247–249.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Segre A. &Ascenzi A., 1984.Fontana Ranuccio: Italy's Earliest Middle Pleistocene Hominid site. Curr. Anthrop., 25 (2): 230–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Seguenza L., 1902.I Vertebrati fossili della provincia di Messina. Boll. Soc. Geol. It., XXI: 115–175.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Seguenza L., 1907.Nuovi resti di mammiferi pontici di Gravitelli presso Messina. Boll. Soc. Geol. It., XXVI: 90–122.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Simons E. L. 1970.The deployment and history of Old World monkeys (Cercopithecidae, Primates). In: “Old World Monkeys” (J. R. Napier and P. H. Napier eds), 97–137. Acad. Press New York.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Simons E. L., 1972.Primate Evolution. Macmillan Publ. Co. New York.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Singer R., Wolff R. G., Gladfelter G. B. &Wymer J. J., 1982.Pleistocene Macaca from Hoxne, Suffolk, England. Folia primatol., 37: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Stehlin H. G., 1923. Ecl. Geol. Helv., 18: 268–281.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Szalay F. S., &Delson E., 1979.Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Thenius E., 1965.Ein Primaten-rest aus dem Altpleistozan von Voigtsted in Thuringen. Palaontol. Abh., 2: 683–689.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Tillier A. M. &Vandermeersch B., 1976.Les Cynomorphes. In: La Prehistoire Francaise”. Tom. 1 Ed. CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Tobien H., 1952.Die oberpliozane Saugerfauna von Wolfersheim-Wetterau. Z. Geol. Ges., 104: 191.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Tobien H., 1986.An early upper miocene (Vallesian) Mesopithecus molar from Rheinhessen F. R. G. Primate Report, 14: 49.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Trouessart E. L., 1978.Catalogue des mammiferes vivant et fossiles. Rev. Mag. Zool., 6: 108–140.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Trouessart E. L., 1879.Catalogue des mammifers vivants et fossiles. Rev. Mag. Zool., 7: 223–230.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Viret J., 1954. N. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lyon, 4: 200.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Vogel C., 1968.The Phylogenetical evaluation of some characters and some morphological trends in the evaluation of skull in catarrhine primates. In: “Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Old World Primates with references to the origin of Man”. B. Chiarelli Ed. Rosenberg & Sellier Torino.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Wagner A., 1839.Fossile uebberreste von einem affenschadel und anderen Saugethieren aus Griechenland. Gel. Anz. Bayerisches Akad. Wiss. Munich, 38: 301–312.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Wagner A., 1857.Neue beitrage zur Kenntniss der fossilen Saugethier Ueberreste von Pikermi. Abh. K. Bayerische Akad. Wiss II Cl., 8: 111–130.Google Scholar

Appendix

  1. 1.
    Martin Penela A., 1983.Presencia del genero Macaco en el yacimiento Pleistoceno de la Solana del Zamborino (Fonelas, Granada, Espana). Bol. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. (Geol), 81 (3–4): 187–195.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perez Ripoll M., 1977.Los Mamiferos del yacimiento Musteriense de Cova Negra (Jativa, Valencia). Servicio de Investigación Prehistórica. Serie Trabajos varios, 53: 147 pp.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Symenoidis N. &Zapfe H. 1976.Primatenzahne (Cercopitbecidae) aus einer Pleistozänen Spaltenfüllung im Steinbruch Tourkobounja, Athen. Ann. Geol. Pays. Hellen., 28: 207–214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice II Sedicesimo 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Ardito
    • 1
  • A. Mottura
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Animal BiologyLab. of AnthropologyTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations