Human Evolution

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 75–90

Dominance-seeking strategies in primates: an evolutionary perspective

  • Jo Liska


The thesis advanced in this paper is that there are basic social influence strategies and attendant principles that are characteristic of social primates. A model for analyzing and comparing social influence strategies in primates, with particular attention to dominance-seeking strategies, is advanced. The utility of the model is illustrated by reference to studies of social influence strategies in baboons, chimpanzees, and humans. Emphasis is placed on the role of communication as the vehicle for social competence. Speculation is offered about the importance of the evolution of symbolic communication in expanding the repertoire of dominance-seeking strategies in human primates.

Key words

Dominance primate and communication 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernstein I.S., 1981.Dominance: the baby and the bathwater. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4: 419–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burke, K., 1950.A rhetoric of motives. Printice-Hall, Englewood Cliffa, N. J.Google Scholar
  3. Capitanio J.P., 1982.Early experience, behavior and organization in rhesus monkey social groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  4. Coe C.L. &Levin R.N., 1980.Dominance assertion in male chimpanzees (pan troglodytes). Aggressive Behavior, 6: 161–74.Google Scholar
  5. Cronkhite, G., 1976.Communication and Awareness. Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Cronkhite G. &Liska J., 1980.The judgment of communicant acceptability in the process of persuasion. In: Persuasion: New directions in theory and research, ed. M. Roloff & G. Miller, Eds.: 101–39. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  7. Cronkhite, G., 1984.Perception and meaning. In: Handbook of Rhetorical and communication theory. C. C. Arnold & J. W. Bowers, Eds.: 51–229. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston.Google Scholar
  8. Datta S.B., 1983.Patterns of agonistic interference. In: Primate social relationships. R. A. Hinde, Ed.: 289–97. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  9. De Waal F.B.M. &Hockstra J.A., 1980.Contexts and predictability of aggression in chimpanzees. Animal behaior, 28: 929–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Waal R.B.M., 1982.Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman I., 1956.The presentation of self in everyday life. Social Sciences Research center, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  12. Goodall J., 1982.Order without law. J. Social Biol. Structure, 5: 353–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodall J., 1986.The chimpanzees of gombe: patterns of behavior. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. Goody E., ed., 1978.Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Hatt J., 1982.The tropical traveller. Pan Original, London.Google Scholar
  16. Humphrey N.K., 1976.The social function of intellect. In: Growing points in ethology. P.P.G. Bateson & R. A. Hinde, Eds.: 303–17. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Jolly, A., 1966.Lemur social behavior and primate intelligence. Science, 153: 501–6.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly G.A., 1955.The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Liska J. & Cronkhite G., 1982.The goals/grasp procedure for analyzing situations as an alternative to situational taxonomies in the prediction of strategy selection. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Louisville, Kentucky.Google Scholar
  20. Liska J., 1986.Symbols: the missing link? In: Primate ontogeny, cognition and social behavior, Vol. 3. J. G. Else & P. C. Lee, Eds.: 169–78. Cabridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Liska J., 1987.Variations in the arbitrariness of asl: An assessment of the symbolicity of simian signs. Human Evolution, 2: 205–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell G. &Maple T.L., 1985.Dominance in nonhuman primates. In: Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior. S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio, eds.: 49–66. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Ng. R., Liska J. &Cronkhite G., 1988.A social acceptability scale for compliance-gaining strategies used to test relationships of sex, dogmatism, and situation to the social acceptability of strategy selection. Unpublished manuscript, Research Center for Language and Semiotic Studies, Indian University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  24. Roloff, M.E. & Barnicott E.F. Jr., 1978.The situational use of pro-and antisocial compliance-gaining strategies by high and low machiavellians. In: Communication yearbook 2. B.D. Ruben, Ed. Transaction, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  25. Roloff M.E. &Barnicott E.F. Jr., 1979.The influence of dogmatism on the situational use of pro-and antisocial compliance-gaining strategies. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 45: 37–45.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenblum L.A. &Schwartz G.G., 1983.Dominance: strategy is the name of the game. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4: 337–378.Google Scholar
  27. Sebeck T.A., 1972.Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  28. Shively, C., 1985.The evolution of dominance hierarchies in non-human primate society. In: Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior, S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio, Eds.: 67–8. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Strum S. 1987.Almost human. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Thomas L., 1974.The lives of a cell: notes of a biology watcher. Viking Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Woodruff G. &Premack D., 1979.Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: the development of deception. Cognition, 7: 333–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice Il Sedicesimo 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Liska
    • 1
  1. 1.Communication and a ResearchIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations