Human Evolution

, Volume 18, Issue 3–4, pp 113–122

Assessing the longitudinal structure of the early hominid foot: A two-dimensional architecture analysis

  • Berillon G. 


Early hominid feet are often very fragmentary preserved and their architectural approaches stayed limited and subject to controversy. This study proposes an architectural analysis of the primate foot realised on dislocated skeleton. It is based on the angular analysis of geometrical relationships between the joint areas. We investigate the longitudinal structure of the primate foot and we present the results concerning someAustralopithecus afarensis specimens from Hadar (Ethiopia) and theHomo habilis Olduvai Hominid 8 foot (Tanzania). The architectural analysis argues for the lack of a longitudinal medial arch inA. afarensis, their joints being in neutral position. On the contrary, the more recent OH8 specimen is arched both medially and laterally.

Key words

Foot architecture primates early hominids angulations locomotion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aiello L., Rye P., Wood B., 1996 — The OH8 first metatarsal.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Sup. 22, 59.Google Scholar
  2. Archibald J.D., Lovejoy C.O., Kinsbury G.H., 1972 — Implications of relative robusticity in the Olduvai Metatarsus.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 37, 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berillon G., 1999. Geometric pattern of the hominoid hallucal tarsometatarsal complex. Quantifying the degree of hallux abduction in early hominids.Comptes-Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, Série IIa, 328, 627–633.Google Scholar
  4. Berillon G., 2000 —Le pied des hominoïdes miocènes et des hominidés fossiles. Architecture, locomotion, évolution. Paris, CNRS,Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie, 166 p.Google Scholar
  5. Bojsen-Møller F., 1979 — Calcaneocuboid joint stability of the longitudinal arch of the foot at high and low gear push off.Journal of Anatomy, 129, 1, 165–176.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke R.J., Tobias P.V., 1995 — Sterkfontein Member 2 foot ones of the oldest south African hominid.Science, 269, 521–524.Google Scholar
  7. Day M.H., Napier J.R., 1964 — Hominid fossils from Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanganyika. Fossil foot bones.Nature, 201, 969–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day M.H., Wood B.A., 1968 — Functional affinities of the Olduvai Hominid 8 talus.Man, 3, 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deloison Y., 1986 — Description d’un calcaneum fossile de primate et sa comparaison avec des calcaneums de Pongidés, d’Australopithèques et d’Homo.Comptes-Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 302, série III, n 7, 257–262.Google Scholar
  10. Deloison Y., 1993 —Etude des restes fossiles des pieds des premiers hominidés: Australopithecuset Homo habilis.Essai d’interprétation de leur mode de locomotion. Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat es Sciences, Université René Descartes, Paris, 783 p.Google Scholar
  11. Elftman H., Manter J., 1935 — The evolution of the human foot, with especial reference to the joints.Journal of Anatomy, 70, 56–70.Google Scholar
  12. Harcourt-Smith W.E.H., Aïello L.C., 1999 — An investigation into the degree of hallux abduction of the OH8 foot.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supplement 28, 145.Google Scholar
  13. Henderson A., Wood B.A., 1977 — The functional anatomy of the Olduvai (OH 8) foot.Journal of Anatomy, 124, 252.Google Scholar
  14. Lamy P., 1986 — The settlement of the longitudinal plantar arch of some African Plio-Pleistocene Hominids: a morphological study.Journal of Human Evolution, 15, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langdon J.H., Bruckner J., Baker H.H., 1991 — Pedal mechanics and bipedalism in early hominids. InOrigine(s) de la bipédie chez les Hominidés, B. Senut et Y. Coppens eds., 159–167, Paris, CNRS,Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie.Google Scholar
  16. Latimer B., Lovejoy O., 1989 — The calcaneus ofAustralopithecus afarensis and its implications for the evolution of bipedality.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Latimer B., Lovejoy O., Johanson D.C., Coppens Y., 1982 — Hominid tarsal, metatarsal and phalangeal bones recovered from the Hadar formation: 1974–1977 collections.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 57, 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latimer B., Ward C.V., 1998 — Locomotion inAustralopithecus: evidence from the leg and foot.Abstract on Contributions to the Dual Congress 1998, 28 june-4 july 1998, Sun City, South Africa, 22–33.Google Scholar
  19. Leakey L.S.B., 1960 — Recent Discoveries at Olduvai Gorge.Nature, 188, 1050–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leakey L.S.B., Tobias P.V., Napier J.R., 1964 — A new species of the GenusHomo from Olduvai Gorge.Nature, 202, 7–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis O.J., 1980 — The joint of the evolving foot. Part III. The fossil evidence.Journal of Anatomy, 131, 275–298.Google Scholar
  22. Lisowski F.P., 1967 — Angular growth changes and comparisons in the primate talus.Folia Primatologia, 7, 2, 81–97.Google Scholar
  23. Lisowski F.P., Albrecht G.H., Oxnard C.E., 1974 — The form of the talus in some higher Primates: a multivariate study.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 41, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lisowski F.P., Albrecht G.H., Oxnard C.E., 1976 — African fossil tali: further multivariate morphometric studies.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 45, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oxnard C.E., 1972 — Some African fossil foot bones: a note on the interpolation into a matrix of extant species.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 37, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oxnard C.E., 1979 — Convention and controversy in human evolution.Homo, 30, 225–246.Google Scholar
  27. Oxnard C.E., Lisowski F.P., 1980 — Functional articulation of some hominoid foot bones: implications for the Olduvai (Hominid 8) foot.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 52, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stern J.T., Susman R.L., 1983 — The locomotor anatomy ofAustralopithecus afarensis.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 60, 279–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Susman R.L., Stern J.T., 1982 — Functional morphology of Homo habilis.Sciences, 217, 931–934.Google Scholar
  30. Susman R.L., Stern J.T., Jungers W.L., 1984 — Arboreality and bipedality in the Hadar hominids.Folia Primatologia, 43, 113–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walter R.C., 1994 — Age of Lucy and the first family: single-crystal 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Denan Dora and Lower Kada Hadar members of the Hadar Formation, Ethiopia.Geology, 22, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walter R.C., Manega P.C., Hay R.L., Drake R.E., Curtis G.H., 1991 — Laser-fusion 40Ar/39Ar dating of Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature, 354, 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wood B.A., 1974a — AHomo talus from East Rudolf.Journal of Anatomy (London), 117, 203–204.Google Scholar
  34. Wood B.A., 1974b — Evidence of locomotor pattern of Homo from early Pleistocene of Kenya.Nature, 251, 135–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berillon G. 
    • 1
  1. 1.UPR 2147 CNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations