Population and Environment

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 81–97

No room at the inn, or why population problems are not all economic

  • Robert Chapman
Article

Abstract

Among the conditions necessary for human well-being is an environment where human populations remain within the biological and cultural carrying capacity of their respective geographies. Overpopulation, although difficult to define precisely, produces serious environmental problems. It might be the case that no one ever died from overpopulation, but certainly many have experienced a diminished quality of life. This paper will argue first, and briefly, numbers do count; second, there are good familiar arguments for restricting the cherished rights to reproduce (and by parity of reasoning property ownership) when these rights conflict with “subsistence” rights; third, some type of government intervention is necessary and desirable if we are to efficiently currtail population growth. This is especially important if we view subsistence rights as positive rights that need official recognition and guidance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle (1941).The Basic Works of Aristotle In McKeon, R. (Ed.), New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Black V. (1996). Asylum: A Global Phenomenon.Public Affairs Quarterly, 10(2) 85–100.Google Scholar
  3. Bok S. (1994). Population and Ethics: Expanding the Moral Space. In Gita, S., Germain, A., Chen L.C. (Eds.).Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights (pp. 15–26), Cambridge: School of Public Health, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Callahan, D. (1971). Ethics and Population Limitation. Occasional paper for The Population Council, New York, NY: Key Book Service.Google Scholar
  5. Callahan, D. (1998).False Hopes: Why America's Quest for Perfect Health is a Recipe for Failure, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  6. Camp, S. (1993). Population: The Critical Decade.Foreign Policy, 90, 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman, R. (1999). Settling Westchester: the value of place.Capitalism Nature Socialism (forthcoming September).Google Scholar
  8. Correa, S. (1994).Population and Reproductive Rights: feminist perspectives from the south. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  9. Coward, H. (1997). New Theology on Population, Consumption, and Ecology.Journal of American Academy of Religion, 65(2), 259–273.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, H. (1997). Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz,Ecological Economics, 22(3), 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feenberg, A. (1991).Critical Theory of Technology, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971).The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1986). The entropy law and the economic process in retrospect.Eastern Economics Journal, 12, 13–21.Google Scholar
  14. Germain, A., Nowrojee, S., Pyne, Hnin, H. (1994). “Setting a New Agenda: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. In Gita, S. & Germain, A., Chen, L.C. (Eds.).Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights (pp. 27–46). Cambridge: School of Public Health: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons.Science, 162, 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  16. Hardin, G. (1971). Nobody Ever Dies of Overpopulation.Science 172, 1297.Google Scholar
  17. Hardin, G. (1972).Exploring New Ethics for Survival, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, J. (1997). The Economy of Regions. In Hannum, H. (Ed.).People, Land, and Community (pp. 105–120). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kant, I. (1956).Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (H.J. Paton, Trans.) New York. (Original work published in 1785).Google Scholar
  20. Keyfitz, N. (1993). Population and Sustainable Development: Distinguishing Fact and Preference Concerning the Future Human Population and Environment.Population and Environment, 14(5), 441–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leopold, A. (1970).A Sand County Almanac. New York: Galaxy Books, Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1949).Google Scholar
  22. Levy, J. (1997). Land rent, ethics, and capitalism's gestation crisis.The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 56(1), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, X. (1996). Making Sense of the Right to Food. In Aiken, W. & LaFollette, H. (Eds).World Hunger and Morality, 2nd edition (pp. 153–170). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Mann, C. C. (1993, February). How Many is Too Many?The Atlantic, pp. 47–50, 52–53, 56, 59, 62–64, 66–67.Google Scholar
  25. Mill, J. S. (1987). Utilitarianism. In Ryan, A. (Ed.).Utilitarianism and Other Essays, New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1861).Google Scholar
  26. Mill, J. S. (1965). Principles of Political Economy. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.).Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, T., Jr. (1996).Living in the Environment, 10th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  28. Nielson, K. (1991). Radical Egalitarianism. In Sterba, J. P.,Morality in Practice, 3rd edition (pp. 33–43). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  29. Nussbaum, M. (1990). Aristotelian Democracy. In Douglas, R. B., Mara, G. R., Richardson, H. S. (Eds.)Liberalism and the Good (pp. 203–252). London: Routledge, Chapman and Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  30. O'Connor, M. (1994).Is Capitalism Sustainable? New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Postel, S. (1994). Carrying Capacity: The Earth's Bottom Line. In Brown, L. (Ed.)The State of the World 1994 (pp. 48–70). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Postman, N. (1992).Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
  33. Radin, M. J. (1996).Contested Commodities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sale, K. (1993).The Green Revolution: The American Environmental Movement 1962–1992. New York, NY: Hill and Wong.Google Scholar
  35. Scanlon, T. (1984). Rights, Goals, and Fairness. In Waldron, J. (Ed.)Theories of Rights (pp. 137–152). New York NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schumacher, E. F. (1975).Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  37. Sen, A. (1992). Property and Hunger. In Bowie, G., Higgins, K., Michaels, M. (Eds.)Thirteen Questions in Ethics (pp. 567–574). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  38. Sen, A. (1981).Poverty and Famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. New York, NY: Clarendon Press of Oxford University.Google Scholar
  39. Shue, H. (1996).Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U. S. Foreign Policy, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stutz, B. (1993). The Landscape of Hunger.Audubon. March/April, 54–63.Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, C. (1998). Atomism. In Sterba, J. (Ed.)Social and political philosophy (pp. 518–530). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  42. Winner, L. (1986).The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Winner, L. (1977).Autonomous technology: technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Religious StudiesPace UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations