Population and Environment

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 27–43 | Cite as

Media coverage of the greenhouse effect

Article

Abstract

Following brief reviews of (a) the decisive role of the media in American politics and (b) earlier studies of media partiality and superficiality, this paper examines media coverage of the greenhouse effect. It does so by comparing two pictures. The first picture emerges from reading all 100 greenhouse-related articles published over a five-month period (May–September 1997) inThe Christian Science Monitor, New York Times, The San Francisco Chronicle, andThe Washington Post. The second picture emerges from themainstream scientific literature. This comparison shows that media coverage of environmental issues suffers from both shallowness and pro-corporate bias. The biospheric implications of these two flaws are touched upon.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asimov, I. & Pohl, F. (1991).Our angry earth. New York: Doherty.Google Scholar
  2. Bagdikian, B. H. (1987).The media monopoly, (2nd ed.), Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, A. (1994). Media (mis)communication on the sceince of climate change.Public Understanding of Science, 3, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boccardi, L. D. (1997). In a presentation given in a December 1997 conference, (“Can Journalism Be Impartial?”). Cited in Iver Peterson's Media ColumnNew York Times, 29 Dec.Google Scholar
  5. Bozell, L. B. & Baker, B. H. (Eds) (1990).And that's the way it is(n't) Alexandria, VA: Media Research Center.Google Scholar
  6. Broecker, W. S. (1994). Is earth climate posed to jump again.Geotimes, 39 (11), 16–18.Google Scholar
  7. Diamond, J. (1992).The Third Chimpanzee, New York. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  8. Franklin, B. Cited in: Rosenfeld, R. N. (1997).American aurora New York: San Martin, p. xiii.Google Scholar
  9. Jefferson, T. cited in: Schmuhl, R. (1992).Stagecraft (2nd edition). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, p. 69. Leggett, J. (1992). Global warming: the worst case.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 48 (June), 28–33.Google Scholar
  10. Lichter, S. R. & Rothman S. (1984). The media and national defense. In Pfaltzgraff R. L., Jr. & Ráanan, U. (Eds.),National security policy (pp. 265–282). Hamden, Conn.: Archon.Google Scholar
  11. Lovins, A. & Lovins, L. H. (1991). Least-cost climatic stabilization.Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 16, 433–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meadows, D. H. (1991). Changing the world through the informationsphere. In C. L. LaMay & E. E. Dennis (Eds.).Media and the environment (pp. 67–79). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, G. T., Jr. (1998).Living in the environment. New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  14. Mooney, H. A. (1998). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  15. Nissani, M. (1992).Lives in the balance. Carson City: Dowser.Google Scholar
  16. Nissani, M. (1996). The greenhouse effects: an interdisciplinary perspective.Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 17, 459–489.Google Scholar
  17. Nissani, M. (1997a). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity.Social Science Journal,34, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nissani, M. (1997b). The greenhouse effect In T. Goldfarb (Ed.).Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial environmental issues (pp. 320–328). Guilford, CT: Dushkin (7th edition).Google Scholar
  19. Nassani, M. (1997c). Brass-tacks ecology,The trumpeter, 14 (#3), 143–148.Google Scholar
  20. Parenti, M. (1996).Dirty truths. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
  21. Seldes, G. (1953).Tell the truth and run. New York: Greenberg.Google Scholar
  22. Sinclair, U. (1919).The brass check. New York: Published by the author.Google Scholar
  23. Streitmatter, R. (1997).Mightier than the sword. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  24. Trumbo, C. (1996). Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue.Public Understanding of Science 5, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United States Department of Energy. (1997).Scenarios of U.S. carbon reductions: Potential impacts of energy-efficiency and low-carbon technologies by 2010 and beyond. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  26. United States National Academy of Sciences (1992).Policy implications of greenhouse warming. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Weiner, J. (1986).Planet earth. Toronto: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  28. Wilkins, L. (1993). Between facts and values: print media coverage of the greenhouse effect, 1987–1990.Public Understanding of Science, 2, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woodwell, G. M. (1995). Biotic feedbacks from the warming of the earth In G. M. Woodwell & F. T. Mackenzie (Eds.).Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system (pp. 3–21). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. York, H. F. (1970).Race to oblivion. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Studies ProgramWayne State UniversityDetroit

Personalised recommendations