Population and Environment

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 223–246 | Cite as

An evolutionary perspective on human fertility

  • Kevin MacDonald
Article

Abstract

This paper illustrates evolutionary approaches to population issues. Life history theory is a general theoretical framework that incorporates environmental influences, contextual influences, and heritable variation. In general, physically or psychologically stressful environments delay maturation and the onset of reproductive competence. Perceptions of scarcity also result in lower fertility by delaying reproduction or having fewer children—a phenomenon viewed as an adaptation to ancestral environments. The desire for upward social mobility is viewed as an evolved motive disposition affecting fertility decisions. The opportunity for upward social mobility typically results in delaying reproduction and lowering fertility in the interest of increasing investment in children. Variation in life history strategies is also influenced by genetic variation, but genetic variation interacts with cultural shifts in the social control of sexual behavior. Finally, i discuss the effects of between-group competition for resources on population issues. Immigration policy and group differences in fertility influence political power within and between societies, often with explosive results. Demographic expansion has often been an instrument of ethnic competition and is an important source of conflict in the contemporary world.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abernethy, V. (1993). The demographic transition revisited: Lessons for foreign and U. S. immigration policy.Ecological Economics, 8, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkow, J. (1989),Darwin, sex, and status: Biological perspectives on mind and culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991) Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization.Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, B.J.L. (1996). From Malthusian frontier to demographic steady state.Population and Development Review, 22, 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bookman, M. Z. (1997).The Demographic Struggle for Power: The Political Economy of Demographic Engineering in the Modern World. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  6. Borgerhoff-Mulder, M. (1999). Demographic transition: Closing in on an evolutionary explanation? Paper presented at the meetings of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Salt Lake City, UT, June 3.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1985).Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, R., & P. J. Richerson. How microevolutionary processes give rise to history. InHistory and evolution, ed. N. H. Nitecki & D. V. Nitecki. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. Boyle, J. (1999). A changing identity: Results from the isle of Man census 1996.Population and Environment, 20, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M. (1994).The Evolution of desire. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Calabrese, L. H., Kirkendall, D. T., Floyd, M., Rapoport, S., Williams, G. W., Weiker, G. F., & Bergfeld, J. A. (1983). Menstrual abnormalities, nutritional patterns, and body composition in female classical ballet dancers.Physician and Sports Medicine, 11, 86–98.Google Scholar
  12. Carson, J., Burks, V., & Parke, R. D. (1993). Parent-child physical play: Determinants and consequence. In K. MacDonald (Ed.),Parent-child play: Descriptions and implications. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Mammalian mating systems.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 236, 339–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, S. M. (1986). Vitality and resilience in the American Jewish family. In S. M. Cohen & P. E. Hyman (Eds.),The Jewish family: Myths and reality (pp. 221–229). New York Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, D. A. (1990). The demography of social class. In N. Mascie-Taylor (Ed.),Biosocial aspects of social class (pp. 59–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, O., & Salt, J. (1992).The British Population. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Courbage, Y. (1999). Economic and political issues of fertility transition in the Arab world—Answers and open questions.Population and Environment, 20, 353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Current Population Reports, 1997: Fertility of American women, June, 1995 (Update).Google Scholar
  19. Diamond, J. (1986). Biology of Birds of paradise and bowerbirds.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
  21. Djordjevic, D. (1992). The Yugoslav Phenomenon. In J. Held (Ed.),The Columbia history of Eastern Europe in the twentieth century. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. Dornbusch, S. M., Carlsmith, J. M., Bushwall, S. J., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, H., Hastorf, A. H., & Gross, R. T. (1985). Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents.Child Development, 56, 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dornbusch, S. M., & Gray, K. D. (1988). Single parent families. In S. M. Dornbusch & M. Strober (Eds.),Feminism, Children, and the New Families (pp. 274–296). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Eisenberg, J. F. (1981).The mammalian radiations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Elder, G. (1974).Children of the Great Depression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, B. J., & Garber, J. (1999). Psychosocial antecedents of variation in pubertal timing: Maternal depression, stepfather presence, and marital and family stress.Child Development, 70, in press.Google Scholar
  27. Ellis, B. J., McFadyn-Ketchum, S., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. S. (1999). Quality of early family relationships and individual differences in the timing of pubertal maturation in girls: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Paper presented at the meetings of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Salt Lake City, UT, June 9.Google Scholar
  28. Fischbein, S. (1977a). Onset of puberty in MZ and DZ twins.Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 26, 151–158.Google Scholar
  29. Fischbein, S. (1977b). Intrapair similarity in physical growth of monozygotic and dizygotic twins.Annals of Human Biology, 4, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Furstenberg, F. F. (1991). As the pendulum swings: Teenage childbearing and social concern.Family Relations, 40, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Furstenberg, F. F., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1989). Teenaged pregnancy and childbearing.American Psychologist, 44, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Geary, D. C. (1998).Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  33. Gilbar, G. G. (1997).Population Dilemmas in the Middle East: Essays in Political Demography and Economy. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  34. Goldstein, S. (1981). Jewish fertility in contemporary America. In P. Ritterband (Ed.),Modern Jewish fertility (pp. 160–208). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  35. Graber, J. A., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Warren, M. P. (1995). The antecedents of menarcheal age: Heredity, family environment, and stressful life events.Child Development, 66, 346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grant, M.Restriction of immigration, Hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization House of Representatives, 68th Congress, 1st Sess., Jan. 5, 1924, 571.Google Scholar
  37. Gruenwald, P., Funakawa, H., Mitani, S., Nishimura, T., & Takeuchi, S. (1967). Influence of environmental factors on foetal growth in man.Lancet, May 13, 1026–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983).Too many women: The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley (Eds.),Population in history (pp. 101–143). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
  40. Hajnal, J. (1983). Two kinds of pre-industrial household formation system. In R. Wall, J. Robin, & P. Laslett (Eds.),Family forms in historic Europe (pp. 65–104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Herrnstein, R. J. (1973).IQ in the meritocracy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  42. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994).The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Herz, F. M., & Rosen, E. J. (1982). Jewish families. In M. McGoldrick, J. K. Pearce, & J. Giordano (Eds.),Ethnicity and family therapy (pp. 364–392). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jensen, A. R. (1998).The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, P. (1985).Saving and spending: The working class economy in Britain, 1870–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kaplan H. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies.Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 39, 91–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kelly, M. (1999). The demographic implications of economic growth in the Isle of Man.Population and Environment, 20, 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals.Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kleiman, D. G. (1981). Correlations among life history characteristics of mammalian species exhibiting two extreme forms of monogamy. In R. D. Alexander & D. W. Tinkle (Eds.),Natural selection and social behavior (pp. 332–344). New York: Chiron Press.Google Scholar
  50. Knode, J. (1974).The decline in fertility in Germany, 1871–1979. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1993).An introduction to behavioural ecology (third edition). Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  52. Krikorian, M. (1999). Personal communication. Center for Immigration Studies Center for Immigration Studies, 1522 K St. N. W., Suite 820, Washington, DC 20005.Google Scholar
  53. Lancaster, J. B., & Lancaster, C. S. (1987). The watershed: Change in parental-investment and family-formation in the course of human evolution. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altman, A. S. Rossi, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.),Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 187–205). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  54. Laslett, P. (1983). Family and household as work group and kin group: areas of traditional Europe compared. In R. Wall, J. Robin, & P. Laslett (Eds.),Family forms in historic Europe (pp. 513–563). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Lee, J., & Feng, W. (1999). Malthusian models and Chinese realities: China's demographic system 1700–2000.Population and Development Review, 25(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lenz, F. (1931). The inheritance of intellectual gifts. In E. Baur, E. Fischer, & F. Lenz (Eds.),Human Heredity, trans. E. Paul & C. Paul (pp. 565–699). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  57. Lieberman, S., & Weinfeld, M. (1978). Demographic trends and Jewish survival.Midstream 24(November), 9–19.Google Scholar
  58. Low, B. S. (1996). Behavioral ecology of conservation in traditional societies.Human Nature, 7, 353–379.Google Scholar
  59. Lynn, R. (1987). The intelligence of the Mongoloids: A psychometric, evolutionary and neurological theory.Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 813–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lynn, R. (1996).Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  61. MacDonald, K. B., & Parke, R. D. (1984). Bridging the gap: Parent-child play interactions and peer interactive competence.Child Development, 55, 1265–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. MacDonald, K. B. (1988).Social and personality development: An evolutionary synthesis. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  63. MacDonald, K. B. (1991). A perspective on Darwinian psychology: Domain-general mechanisms, plasticity, and individual differences.Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. MacDonald, K. B. (1994).A people that shall dwell alone: Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  65. MacDonald, K. (1995a). Evolution, the Five Factor Model, and Levels of Personality.Journal of Personality, 63, 525–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. MacDonald, K. B. (1995b). The Establishment and Maintenance of Socially Imposed Monogamy in Western Europe.Politics and the Life Sciences, 14, 3–23.Google Scholar
  67. MacDonald, K. B. (1998a). Jewish involvement in influencing United States immigration policy, 1881–1965: A historical review.Population and Environment, 19, 295–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. MacDonald, K. B. (1998b).The culture of critique: An evolutionary analysis of Jewish involvement in twentieth-century intellectual and political movements. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  69. MacFarlane, A. (1980). Illegitimacy and illegitimates in English history. In P. Laslett, K. Ooseterveen & R. M. Smith (Eds.),Bastardy and its comparative history (pp. 71–85). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  70. MacFarlane, A. (1986).Marriage and love in England: Modes of reproduction 1300–1840. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Genetical, environmental, and personality factors influencing the age of first sexual intercourse in twins.Journal of Biosocial Science, 9, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McLanahan, S., & Booth, K. (1989). Mother-only families: Problems, prospects, and politics.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miller, A. K., & Corsellis, J. A. N. (1977). Evidence for a secular increase in human brain weight during the past century.Annals of Human Biology, 4, 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Miller, E. M. (1994a). Paternal provisioning versus mate seeking in human populations.Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Miller, E. M. (1994b). Optimal Adjustment of Mating Effort to Environmental Conditions: A Critique of Chisholm's Application of Life History Theory, with Comments on Race Differences in Male Paternal Investment Strategies.Mankind Quarterly, 34, 297–316.Google Scholar
  76. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Belsky, J., & Silva, P. A. (1992). Childhood experience and the onset of menarche: A test of a sociobiological model.Child Development, 63, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moss, J. J. (1964). Teenage marriage: Cross-national trends and sociological factors in the decision of when to marry.Acta Sociologica, 8, 98–117.Google Scholar
  78. Norton, A. J., & Miller, L. F. (1992). Marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the 1990's.U. S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports Special Studies P23–180.Google Scholar
  79. Parsons, J. (1998)Human Population Competition. A Study of the Pursuit of Power Through Numbers, 2 vols. Lewiston, NY. & Lampeter, Wales.Google Scholar
  80. Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nesslroade, J. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1989). Genetic influence on adults' ratings of their current family environment.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 791–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ramet, S. (1992).Nationalism and federalism in Yugoslavia 1962–1991 (2nd ed.). Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Ritterband, P. (1981). Introduction. In P. Ritterband (Ed.),Modern Jewish fertility. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  83. Rowe, D. C. (1994).The limits of family influence: Genes, experience, and behavior. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  84. Rowe, D. C., (1999). Environmental and Genetic Influences on Pubertal Development: Evolutionary Life History Traits? Paper presented at the meetings of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Salt Lake City, UT, June 5.Google Scholar
  85. Rushton, J. P. (1988). Race differences in intelligence: A review and evolutionary analysis.Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 1009–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rushton, J. P. (1995).Race, evolution, and behavior. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  87. Southwood, T. R. E. (1981). Bionomic strategies and population parameters. In R. M. May (Ed.),Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications (pp. 30–52). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  88. Surbey, M. (1990). Family composition, stress, and the timing of human menarche. In T. E. Ziegler & F. B. Bercovitch (Eds.),Socioendocrinology of Primate Reproduction (pp. 11–32). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  89. Surbey, M. (1999). Growing up early or late? An endocrinological investigation of alterations in pubertal timing under stressful conditions. Paper presented at the meetings of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Salt Lake City, UT, June 5.Google Scholar
  90. Tanner, J. M. (1990).Foetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Turke, P. W. (1989). Evolution and the demand for children.Population and Development Review, 15, 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wall, R. (1983). The household: Demographic and economic changes in England, 1650–1970. In R. Wall, J. Robin and P. Laslett (Eds.),Family forms in historic Europe (pp. 493–512). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Warren, M. P., Brooks-Gunn, J., Hamilton, L. H., Hamilton, W. G., & Warren, L. F. (1986). Scoliosis and fractures among in young ballet dancers: Relationships to delayed menarcheal age and secondary amenorrhea.New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1348–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Warren, M. P., Brooks-Gunn, J., Fox, R., Lancelot, C., Newman, D., & Hamilton, W. G. (1991). Lack of bone accretion and amenorrhea in young dancers: Evidence for a relative osteopenia in weight bearing bones.Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 72, 847–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilson, E. O. (1975).Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wilson, J. Q. (1993). The family-values debate.Commentary, 95(4), 24–31.Google Scholar
  97. Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985).Crime and human nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  98. Wrigley, E. A. & Schofield, R. (1981).The population history of England, 154101871. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Zajonc, R. B., Marcus, H., & Marcus, G. B. (1979). The birth order puzzle.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1325–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin MacDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State University-Long BeachLong Beach

Personalised recommendations