Abstract
Human evolution can shed light on ethics through an account of valuing. This basic human activity is to be explained as a judgement on our desires in the light of a self appraisal with respect to desires of higher order. These concern what we desire to be and how we desire to lead a life. It is argued that the conditions of valuing may be found at least in primitive form in the use of language, which surely has an evolutionary explanation. But values may be trivial or false; to be ethically correct they must be authentic and objective. Because belief and desire are plastic to cultural influence, we cannot expect an evolutionary account of this last appraisal.
Keywords
Human Nature Inclusive Fitness Free Agent Perceptual Belief Evolutionary Account
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Curtiss S., 1977.Genie: a psycholinguistic study of a modern-day wild-child. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Dennett D.C., 1987.The Intentional Stance. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
- Frankfurt H., 1971.Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Jnl. of Philosophy, 68: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grice H.P., 1957.Meanings. Philosophical Review, 66: 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Itard J.M.G. &Malson, 1972.The wild boy of Averon. In: Malson Wolf children and the problem of human nature. Monthly Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Kitcher P., 1985.Vaulting ambition: sociobiology and the quest for human nature. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
- Nerlich G., 1989.Values and valuing: speculations on the ethical life of persons. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Sellars W., 1963.Science, Perception and Reality. Humanities Press, New York.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Editrice Il Sedicesimo 1990