Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 303–309

The use of geostatistics for sampling a core collection of perennial ryegrass populations

  • Gilles Charmet
  • François Balfourier
Regular Research Papers

Summary

The concept of core collections as developed by Brown (1989a) would be very useful in optimizing conservation strategies of natural population of outbreeding grasses. The aim of a core is to represent, in a subsample of manageable size, as much as possible of the genetic variation from a large collection. In the case of natural populations of ryegrass, different methods of stratified sampling with one level of classification have been compared:
  1. 1.

    Random sampling.

     
  2. 2.

    Clustering based on agronomic traits.

     
  3. 3.

    Clustering based on the administrative region of origin.

     
  4. 4.

    Clustering based on agronomic traits with geographic contiguity constraint.

     

This last method is based on geostatistics analysis, which allows to study the spatial pattern of genetic diversity. Ryegrass populations show for many agronomic traits a spatial structure of range 120 km, which could be attributed to the isolation-by-distance phenomenon. This range was used as a constraint for clustering populations based on multisite evaluation data.

The results show that, in a species like perennial ryegrass, a random sample of 5% of the accessions maintains 86% of the diversity. Core samples of 10% as recommended by Brown (1989b) enhance the representation to more than 90%. The use of stratified sampling methods is always more efficient than random sampling. The clustering based on geostatistics gives the best results with 92% of the variation being maintained in a 5% core collection.

Key words

genetic resources core collection sampling Lolium perenne

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balfourier F. & G. Charmet, 1991. Relationships between agronomic characters and ecogeographical factors in a collection of French perennial ryegrass populations. Agronomie 11:645–657.Google Scholar
  2. Brown A.H.D., 1989a. The case for core collections. In; A.H.D. Brown, O.H., Frankel, D.R. Marshall & J.T. Williams (Eds) The use of plant genetic resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 136–156.Google Scholar
  3. Brown A.H.D., 1989b. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–824.Google Scholar
  4. Charmet G., F. Balfourier & A. Bion, 1990. Agronomic evaluation of a collection of French perennial ryegrass populations: multivariate classification using genotype x environment interactions. Agronomic 10:807–823.Google Scholar
  5. Charmer G., F. Balfourier & C. Ravel, 1993. Isozyme polymorphism and geographic differentiation in a collection of French perennial ryegrass populations. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 40:77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charmet G., F. Balfourier & P. Monestiez, 1994. Hierarchical clustering of perennial ryegrass populations with geographic contiguity constraint. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crossa J., C.M. Hernandez, P. Bretting, S.A. Eberhart & S. Taba, 1993. Statistical genetic considerations for maintaining germplasm collections. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frankel O.H., 1984. Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. In; W. Arber, K. Llimensee, W.J. Peacock & P. Starlinger (Eds) Genetic manipulation: Impact on man and society. pp 161–170. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.Google Scholar
  9. Hutcheson K., 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon Formula. J. Theor. Biol. 29:151–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kimura M. & J.F. Crow, 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Monestiez P., M. Goulard & G. Charmet, 1994. Geostatistics for spatial genetic structures: study of wild populations of perennial ryegrass. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peeters J.P. & J.A. Martinelli, 1989. Hierarchical cluster analysis as a tool to manage variation in germplasm collections. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78:42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peeters J.P., H.G. Wilkes & N.W. Galwey, 1990. The use of ecogeographical data in the exploitation of variation from gene banks. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:110–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Spagnoletti Zeuli P.L. & C.O. Qualset, 1993. Evaluation of five strategies for obtaining a core subset from a large genetic resource collection of durum wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilles Charmet
    • 1
  • François Balfourier
    • 1
  1. 1.INRA, Station d'amélioration des plantesClermont-Ferrand, CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations