Ionics

, Volume 11, Issue 3–4, pp 262–268 | Cite as

Ionic conductivity in hydrogels for contact lens applications

  • David Austin
  • R. V. Kumar
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Biphasic hydrogel polymers are in the forefront of new extended wear contact lens development. In the biphasic hydrogel the objective is to produce co-continuous domains of siloxane units for high oxygen permeability, coupled with hydrophilic units forming aqueous channels for hydraulic and ion mobility. These are distributed in phase separated nano-scale regions such that the material is optically clear while achieving the required properties to maintain corneal health and lens movement.

This paper describes how Impedance Spectroscopy permits a rapid measurement of ion conductivity in a range of silicone and non-silicone hydrogel materials with water contents ranging from 18% to 75% equilibrium water content. For non-silicone hydrogels relative sodium ion conductivity follows a typical percolation curve. However, for silicone hydrogels ion mobility is three orders of magnitude higher than conventional hydrogels of the same equilibrium water content.

The influence of electrolyte concentration, interfacial electrode sample contact pressure and temperature are also reported.

Keywords

Equilibrium Water Content Contact Lens Application Silicone Hydrogel Percolation Curve High Oxygen Permeability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    O. Witcherle and D. Lim, Hydrophillic gels for biological use, Nature185, 117–118 (1960).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Hirt, US patent 6039913 (2000).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Kunzler, R. Ozark, Fluorosilicone hydrogels, US patent 5321108 (1994).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Kunzler, R. Ozark, Hydrogels based on hydrophilic side-chains siloxanes, Journal of Applied Polymer Science55, 611–619 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Lai, Role of Bulky Polysiloxanylalkyl methacrylates in oxygen-permeable hydrogel materials, Journal of applied polymer science56, 317–324 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    P.C. Nicolson, J. Vogt, Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution, Biomaterials22, 3273–3283 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Domschke, D. Lohman, L. Winterton, On-eye mobility of soft oxygen permeable contact lenses, Proceedings of the ACS Spring National Meeting, San Francisco: PMSE. (1997).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Austin, D. Champeney, A Technique for Measuring the Alternating Current Electrical Conductivity of Hydrogels, Journal of the BCLA18, 115–118. (1995).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Austin, The Electrical Conductivity of Soft Contact Lens Hydrogels, MPhil Thesis, School of Physics, UEA, Norwich, UK. (1996).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C.M. Weikart, M. Miyama, H.K. Yasuda, Surface modification of conventional polymers by depositing plasma polymers of trimethylsilane and Trimethlysilane+O2, Journal of Colloid and interfacial Science211, 28–38 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    B.J. Tighe, Silicone Hydrogel Materials-How do they work? in: Silicone Hydrogels: the rebirth of extended wear contact lenses (D. Sweeney, Ed.) Butterworth Heinemann, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Tighe, Hydrogel materials: The patents and the products, Optician pp. 17–24 (1989).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P.H. Corkhill, A.M. Jolly, C.O. Ng and B.J. Tighe, Synthetic Hydrogels: 1. Hydroxyalkyl acrylate and methacrylate copolymers-water binding studies, Polymer28, 1758–1765 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    V.J. McBrierty, S.J. Martin, F.E. Karasz, Understanding hydrated polymers: the perspective of NMR, Journal of Molecular Liquids80, 179–205, (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Lopez-Alemany, V. Compan, M. Refojo, Porous Structure of Purevision versus Focus Night & Day and Conventional Hydrogel Contact Lenses, Journal of Biomedical Material Research63, 319–325 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    D.L. Koch and A.S. Sangani, The AC Electrical Impedance of a Fractal Boundary to an Electrolytic Solution, J. Electrchem. Soc.138, No. 2, 475 (1991).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    E. Barsoukov, J.R. Macdonald, Impedance Spectroscopy, Theory, Experiment and Applications, Wiley, 87 (2005).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    J.E.B. Randles, Kinetics of Rapid Electrode Reactions, Disc. Faraday Soc.1, 11–19 (1947).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    B.B. Damaskin, The Principles of Current Methods for the Study of Electrochemical Reactions, Mc Graw Hill Inc. 61–78 (1965).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. Nyikos and T. Pajkossy, Fractal Dimension and Fractional Power Frequency-Dependent Impedance of Blocking Electrodes, Electrochimica Acta30, 1533–1540 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. De Levie, On Porous Electrodes in Electrolyte Solutions, Electrochimca Acta9, 1231–1245 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    R. De Levie, The Influence of Surface Roughness of Solid Electrodes on Electrochemical Measurements, Electrochimca Acta10, 113–130 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    J.R. Macdonald, Impedance Spectroscopy: Old Problems and New developments, Electrochimica Acta30, No. 10, 1483–1492 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    W. Scheider, Theory of the Frequency Dispersion of Electrode Polarization, Topology of Networks with Fractional Frequency Dependence, The Journal of Physical Chemistry79, No. 2. 127–135 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    P.H. Bottelberghs, Low-Frequency Measurements on Solid Electrolytes and Their Interpretations, in: Solid Electrolytes (P. Hagenmuller and W. Van Gool, Eds.) Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    L. Nyikos, and T. Pajkossy, Diffusion to Fractal Surfaces, Electrochimica Acta31, 1347–1350 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    X. Qian et al., Methods to study the ionic conductivity of polymeric electrolytes using a.c. impedance spectroscopy, J. Solid State Electrochem.6, 8–15 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    T. Isono, J. Chem. Eng. Data29(1), 45–52 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    N. Lakshminararayanaiah, Transport Phenomena in Membranes, Academic Press, 1969, p. 226.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    R.A. Robinson and R.H. Stokes, Electrolyte Solutions, Butterworths, 1968, p. 133–147.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    R.A. Robinson and R.H. Stokes, Electrolyte Solutions, Butterworths, 1968, p. 87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IfI - Institute for Ionics 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Austin
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. V. Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Optometry & Ophthalmic DispensingAPU CambridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and MetallurgyUniversity of CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations