Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 81, Issue 3–4, pp 245–269 | Cite as

Evaluation and model impacts of alternative boundary-layer height formulations

  • D. H. P. Vogelezang
  • A. A. M. Holtslag


We study bulk formulations for the boundary-layer height which are currently in use for atmospheric modelling. The formulations are based on various forms of the Richardson number, and these are evaluated with Cabauw field data in stable conditions. Results for both a large-eddy simulation model and anE-ε turbulence closure model for neutral boundary layers are also utilised. An updated formulation is introduced, which combines the effects of shear in the outer region of the boundary layer with surface friction. The updated formulation has a better performance for neutral boundary layers with upper level stratification. The findings are illustrated with a single-column model for a case with relatively high winds over the tropical ocean including shallow cumulus convection, and for a case with fair weather over land. We also show that for stable conditions, the updated formulation performs better than estimates on the basis of surface friction alone.


Boundary Layer Richardson Number Stable Boundary Layer Cumulus Convection Turbulence Closure Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. André, J. C.: 1983, ‘On the Variability of the Nocturnal Boundary-Layer Depth’,J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 2309–2311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrén, A. and Moeng, C.-H.: 1993, ‘Single-Point Closures in a Neutrally Stratified Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 3366–3379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Baas, A. F. and Driedonks, A. G. M.: 1985, ‘Internal Gravity Waves in a Stably Stratified Boundary Layer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 31, 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duynkerke, P. G.: 1988, ‘Application of theE-ε Turbulence Closure Model to the Neutral and Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 865–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fouquart, Y. and Bonnell, B.: 1980, ‘Computation of Solar Heating of the Earth’s Atmosphere: A New Parameterization’,Beitr. Phys. Atmosph. 53, 35–62.Google Scholar
  6. Garratt, J. R.: 1982, ‘Observations in the Nocturnal Boundary Layer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 22, 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grant, A. L. M.: 1992, ‘The Structure of Turbulence in the Near-Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 226–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hack, J.: 1994, ‘Parameterization of Moist Convection in the NCAR Community Climate Model, CCM2’,J. Geophys. Res. 99, 5551–5568.Google Scholar
  9. Hanna, S. R.: 1969, ‘The Thickness of the Planetary Boundary Layer’,Atmos. Environ. 3, 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland, J. Z. and Rasmusson, E. M.: 1973, ‘Measurement of Atmospheric Mass, Energy and Momentum Budgets over a 500 km Square of Tropical Ocean’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 101, 44–55.Google Scholar
  11. Holtslag, A. A. M. and Boville, B. A.: 1993, ‘Local versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model’,J. Climate 6, 1825–1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holtslag, A. A. M., van Meijgaard, E., and de Rooij, W. C.: 1995, ‘A Comparison of Boundary Layer Diffusion Schemes in Unstable Conditions over Land’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 76, 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holtslag, A. A. M. and Nieuwstadt, F. T. M.: 1986, ‘Scaling the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 36, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, J. and Mahrt, L.: 1992, ‘Simple Formulation of Turbulent Mixing in the Stable Free Atmosphere and Nocturnal Boundary Layer’,Tellus 44A, 381–394.Google Scholar
  15. Kitaigorodskii, S. A. and Joffre, S. M.: 1988, ‘In Search of a Simple Scaling for the Height of the Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,Tellus 40A, 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koracin, D. and Berkowicz, R.: 1988, ‘Nocturnal Boundary-Layer Height: Observations by Acoustic Sounders and Predictions in Terms of Surface-Layer Parameters’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 43, 65–83.Google Scholar
  17. Large, W. G., Mc Williams, J. C., and Doney, S. C.: 1994, ‘Oceanic Vertical Mixing: A Review and a Model with a Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Parameterization’,Rev. Geophys. 32(4), 363–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahrt, L.: 1981, ‘Modelling the Depth of the Stable Boundary Layer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 21, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahrt, L.: 1985, ‘Vertical Structure and Turbulence in the Very Stable Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 2333–2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahrt, L., Heald, R. C., Lenschow, D. H., Stankov, B. B. and Troen, I.: 1979, ‘An Observational Study of the Nocturnal Boundary Layer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 17, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moeng, C.-H. and Sullivan, P. P.: 1994, ‘A Comparison of Shear- and Buoyancy-Driven Planetary Boundary-Layer Flows’,J. Atmos. Sci. 51, 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morcrette, J.-J.: 1991, ‘Radiation and Cloud Radiative Properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting System’,J. Geophys. Res. 96, 9121–9132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nieuwstadt, F. T. M.: 1984, ‘The Turbulent Structure of the Stable, Nocturnal Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2202–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van Pul, W. A. J., Holtslag, A. A. M., and Swart, D. P. J.: 1994, ‘A Comparison of ABL Heights Inferred Routinely from Lidar and Radiosondes at Noontime’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 68, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Siebesma, A. P. and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: 1995, ‘Evaluation of Parametric Assumptions for Shallow Cumulus Convection’,J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Siebesma, A. P. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: 1996, ‘Model Impacts of Entrainment and Detrainment Rates in Shallow Cumulus Convection’,J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 2354–2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tiedtke, M.: 1989, ‘A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 1779–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Troen, I. and Mahrt, L.: 1986, ‘A Simple Model of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer; Sensitivity to Surface Evaporation’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 37, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Ulden, A. P. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: 1985, ‘Estimation of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Parameters for Diffusion Applications’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 24, 1196–1207.Google Scholar
  30. van Ulden, A. P. and Wieringa, J.: 1996, ‘Atmospheric Boundary Layer Research at Cabauw’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 78, 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wetzel, P. J.: 1982, ‘Toward Parameterization of the Stable Boundary Layer’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 21, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. H. P. Vogelezang
    • 1
  • A. A. M. Holtslag
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)De BiltThe Netherlands
  2. 2.The Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Research at the University of Utrecht (IMAU)UtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)USA

Personalised recommendations