Advertisement

Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 255–274 | Cite as

Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth century

  • Robert J. O'Hara
Article

Abstract

‘The Natural System’ is the abstract notion of the order in living diversity. The richness and complexity of this notion is revealed by the diversity of representations of the Natural System drawn by ornithologists in the Nineteenth Century. These representations varied in overall form from stars, to circles, to maps, to evolutionary trees and cross-sections through trees. They differed in their depiction of affinity, analogy, continuity, directionality, symmetry, reticulation and branching, evolution, and morphological convergence and divergence. Some representations were two-dimensional, and some were three-dimensional; n-dimensional representations were discussed but never illustrated. The study of diagrammatic representations of the Natural System is made difficult by the frequent failure of authors to discuss them in their texts, and by the consequent problem of distinguishing features which carried meaning from arbitrary features and printing conventions which did not. Many of the systematics controversies of the last thirty years have their roots in the conceptual problems which surrounded the Natural System in the late 1800s, problems which were left unresolved when interest in higher-level systematics declined at the turn of this century.

Key Words

Classification diagrams evolution history natural history natural system ornithology phylogeny representation systematics taxonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrett, P. H.: 1960, ‘A Transcription of Darwin's First Notebook on “Transmutation of Species”’,Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 122, 247–296.Google Scholar
  2. Bowler, P. J.: 1989, ‘Development and Adaptation: Evolutionary Concepts in British Morphology, 1870–1914’,British Journal for the History of Science 22, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brady, R.: 1985, ‘On the Independence of Systematics’,Cladistics 1, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coleman, W.: 1971,Biology in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C.: 1859,On the Origin of Species, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  6. de Queiroz, K.: 1988, ‘Systematics and the Darwinian Revolution’,Philosophy of Science 55, 238–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fürbringer, M.: 1888, ‘Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vögel’,Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 15.Google Scholar
  8. Gaffney, E. S.: 1984, ‘Historical Analysis of Theories of Chelonian Relationship’,Systematic Zoology 33, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghiselin, M. T.: 1969,The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of California Press, Berkeley. (Reprinted 1984, University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  10. Greene, J. C. 1959,The Death of Adam, Iowa State University Press,Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  11. Harrison, C. J. O.: 1969, ‘The Possible Affinities of the Australian Treecreepers of the GenusClimacteris’,Emu 69, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huxley, T. H.: 1868a, ‘On the Classification and Distribution of theAlectoromorphae andHeteromorphae’, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1868, pp. 294–319.Google Scholar
  13. Huxley, T. H.: 1868b, (Letter to A. Newton)Ibis 4 (new series), 357–362.Google Scholar
  14. Jardine, W.: 1858,Memoirs of High Edwin Strickland, M.A., John Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
  15. Kaup, J. J.: 1854, ‘Einige Worte über die systematische Stellung der Familie der Raben, Corvidae’,Journal für Ornithologie 2,Jahresversammlung, XLVII-LVII.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, G.: 1866,Natural History of Birds, Lectures on Ornithology in Ten Parts, Part I, J. A. Bancroft & Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  17. Lovejoy, A. O.: 1936,The Great Chain of Being, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Mayer, E.: 1969,Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. McGowan, C.: 1982, ‘The Wing Musculature of the Brown KiwiApteryx Australis Mantelli and Its Bearing on Ratite Affinities’,Journal of Zoology 197, 173–219.Google Scholar
  21. Nelson, G. G., and N. I. Platnick: 1981,Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. O'Hara, R. J.: 1988a, ‘Homage to Clio, or, Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology’,Systematic Zoology 37, 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O'Hara, R. J.: 1988b, ‘Diagrammatic Classifications ofBirds, 1819–1901: Views of the Natural System in 19th-Century British Ornithology’, in H. Ouellet (ed.),Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, pp. 2746–2759.Google Scholar
  24. Olson, S. L.: 1987, ‘More on the Affinities of the Black-Collared Thrush of Borneo(Chlamydochaera jefferyi)’,Journal für Ornithologie 128, 246–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reichenow, A.: 1882,Die Vögel der zoologischen Gärten, Verlag von L. U. Kittler, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  26. Reif, W.-E.: 1983, ‘Hilgendorf's (1863) Dissertation on the Steinheim Planorbids (Gastropoda; Miocene): The Development of a Phylogenetic Research Program for Paleontology’,Paläontologische Zeitschrift 57, 7–20.Google Scholar
  27. Rennie, J.: 1833,Ornithological Dictionary of British Birds, by Colonel G. Montagu, F.L.S. A New Edition, W. S. Orr and W. Smith, London.Google Scholar
  28. Sharpe, R. B.: 1891,A Review of Recent Attempts to Classify Birds, Second International Ornithological Congress, Budapest.Google Scholar
  29. Stevens, P. F.: 1982, ‘Augustin Augier's “Arbre Botanique” (1801), a Remarkable Early Botanical Representation of the Natural System’,Taxon 32, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stevens, P. F.: 1984, ‘Metaphors and Typology in the Development of Botanical Systematics 1690–1960, or the Art of Putting New Wine in Old Bottles’,Taxon 33, 169–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stresemann, E.: 1975,Ornithology from Aristotle to the Present, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Strickland, H. E.: 1840, ‘Observations Upon the Affinities and Analogies of Organized Beings’,Magazine of Natural History 4,(new series), 219–226.Google Scholar
  33. Strickland, H. E.: 1841, ‘On the True Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany’,Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6, 184–194. (‘Read before the Zoological Section at Glagow, Sept. 21, 1840.’)Google Scholar
  34. Strickland, H. E.: 1844, ‘Description of a Chart of the Natural Affinities of the Insessorial Order of Birds’, Report of the Thirteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held at Cork in August 1843, Notices and Abstracts of Communications, p. 69. (Read 1843.)Google Scholar
  35. Swainson, W.: 1834,A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural History, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  36. Swainson, W.: 1835,A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  37. Swainson, W.: 1837,On the Natural History and Classification of Birds, Vol. II, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London.Google Scholar
  38. Swainson, W. and J. Richardson: 1831,Fauna Boreali-Americana...Part Second, The Birds, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  39. Vigors, N. A.: 1824, ‘Observations on the Natural Affinities that Connect the Orders and Families of Birds’,Transactions of the Linnean Society 14, 395–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Voss, E. G.: 1952, ‘The History of Keys and Phylogenetic Trees in Systematic Biology’,Journal of the Scientific Laboratory, Denison University 43, 1–25.Google Scholar
  41. Wallace, A. R.: 1856, ‘Attempts at a Natural Arrangement of Birds’,Annals and Magazine of Natural History, second series 18, 193–216.Google Scholar
  42. Warner, D. J.: 1979,Graceanna Lewis, Scientist and Humanitarian, Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, H. F., and M. H. Doner: 1937,The Historical Development of Insect Classification, privately printed.Google Scholar
  44. Winsor, M. P.: 1976,Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life, University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. O'Hara
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of BirdsNational Museum of Natural History Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations