Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 155–180

Must scientific diagrams be eliminable? The case of path analysis

  • James R. Griesemer
Article

Abstract

Scientists use a variety of modes of representation in their work, but philosophers have studied mainly sentences expressing propositions. I ask whether diagrams are mere conveniences in expressing propositions or whether they are a distinct, ineliminable mode of representation in scientific texts. The case of path analysis, a statistical method for quantitatively assessing the relative degree of causal determination of variation as expressed in a causal path diagram, is discussed. Path analysis presents a worst case for arguments against eliminability since path diagrams are usually presumed to be mathematically or logically “equivalent” in an important sense to sets of linear path equations. I argue that path diagrams are strongly generative, i.e., that they add analytical power to path analysis beyond what is supplied by linear equations, and therefore that they are ineliminable in a strong scientific sense.

Key words

Path analysis regression scientific diagrams Sewall Wright statistics in biology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Griesemer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyProgram in History and Philosophy of ScienceDavisUSA
  2. 2.Center for Population BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations