Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 135–154 | Cite as

Epigenetic landscaping: Waddington's use of cell fate bifurcation diagrams

  • Scott F. Gilbert


From the 1930s through the 1970s, C. H. Waddington attempted to reunite genetics, embryology, and evolution. One of the means to effect this synthesis was his model of the epigenetic landscape. This image originally recast genetic data in terms of embryological diagrams and was used to show the identity of genes and inducers and to suggest the similarities between embryological and genetic approaches to development. Later, the image became more complex and integrated gene activity and mutations. These revised epigenetic landscapes presented an image of how mutations could alter developmental pathways to yield larger phenotypic changes. These diagrams became less important as the operon became used to model differential gene regulation.

Key Words

Epigenetic landscape synthesis of evolution genetics and development Waddington 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abir-Am, P.: 1987, ‘The Biotheoretical Gathering, Trans-Disciplinary Authority and the Incipient Legitimation of Molecular Biology in the 1930s: New Perspective on the Historical Sociology of Science’,History of Science 25, 1–70.Google Scholar
  2. Abir-Am, P.: 1988, ‘The Assessment of Interdisciplinary Research in the 1930s: The Rockefeller Foundation and Physico-Chemical Morphology’,Minerva 26, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abir-Am, P.: in press, ‘The Philosophical Background of Joseph Needham's Work in Chemical Embryology’, in S. F. Gilbert (ed.),A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, G.: 1969, ‘T. H. Morgan and the New American Biology’,Quarterly Review of Biology 44, 168–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, G. E.: 1985, ‘Thomas Hunt Morgan: Materialism and Experimentalism in the Development of Modern Genetics’,Trends in Genetics 3, 151–154, 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beadle, G. and B. Ephrussi: 1937, ‘Development of Eye Colors inDrosophila: Diffusible Substances and Their Interrelations’,Genetics 22, 76–86.Google Scholar
  7. Berrill, N. J.: 1941, ‘Spatial and Temporal Growth Patterns in Colonial Organisms’,Growth Symposium 3, 89–111.Google Scholar
  8. Berrill, N. J.: 1961,Growth, Development and Pattern, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, W. K.: 1883,The Law of Heredity, John Murphy, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  10. Cassirer, E.: 1950, ‘Developmental Mechanics and the Problem of Cause in Biology’, in E. Cassirer (ed.),The Problems of Knowledge, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  11. Dobzhansky, T.: 1970,Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University, New York, pp. 210–211.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, S. F.: 1979, ‘The Embryological Origins of the Gene Theory’,Journal of the History of Biology 11, 307–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert, S. F.: 1988, ‘Cellular Politics: Ernest Everett Just, Richard B. Goldschmidt, and the Attempt to Reconcile Embryology and Genetics’, in R. Rainger, K. R. Benson, and J. Maienschein (eds.),The American Development of Biology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 311–346.Google Scholar
  14. Gilbert, S. F.: in press, ‘Induction and the Origins of Developmental Genetics’, in S. Gilbert (ed.),A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Goldschmidt, R. B.: 1938,Physiological Genetics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Griesemer, J., and W. C. Wimsatt: 1988, unpublished manuscript, ‘On Reading Weismann Diagrams’, presented at the meeting of the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Study of Biology, London, Ontario, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Haraway, D. J.: 1976,Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors of Organicism in Twentieth Century Developmental Biology, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  18. Holtfreter, J.: 1968, ‘Address in Honor of Viktor Hamburger’, in M. Locke (ed.),The Emergence of Order in Developing Systems. The Twenty-seventh Symposium of the Society for Developmental Biology, Academic Press, New York, p. xi.Google Scholar
  19. Jacob, F.: 1988,The Statue Within, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Just, E. E.: 1939,Biology of the Cell Surface, Blakiston, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  21. Kauffman, S. A.: 1987, ‘Developmental Logic and Its Evolution’,BioEssays 6, 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lerner, I. M.: 1958,The Genetic Basis of Selection, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  23. Lillie, F.R.: 1927, ‘The Gene and the Ontogenetic Process’,Science 66, 361–368.Google Scholar
  24. Mayr, E.: 1963,Animals Speciation and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  25. Merrell, D. J.: 1962,Evolution and Genetics, Rhinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Morgan, T. H.: 1926,The Theory of the Gene, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  27. Needham, J.: 1932,The Great Amphibian, Student Christian Movement, London.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, A.: 1977, ‘Conrad Hal Waddington: 8 November 1905-26 September 1975’,Biographical Memoirs: Fellows of the Royal Society 23, 575–622.Google Scholar
  29. Roll-Hanson, N.: 1978, ‘Drosophila Genetics: A Reductionist Research Program,Journal of the History of Biology 11, 159–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roux, W.: 1894, ‘The Problems, Methods, and Scope of Developmental Mechanics’, W. M. Wheeler (trans.),Biological Lectures MBL 1894, 149–190.Google Scholar
  31. Sander, K.: 1986, ‘The Role of Genes in Ontogenesis: Evolving Concepts from 1883-1983 as Perceived by an Insect Embryologist’, in T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, and C. C. Wylie (eds.),A History of Embryology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 363–396.Google Scholar
  32. Spemann, H.: 1903, ‘Entwicklungsphysiologische Studien am Tritonei III’,Roux Archeologische Entwicklung 16, 551–631.Google Scholar
  33. Waddington, C. H.: 1939a,An Introduction to Modern Genetics, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Waddington, C. H.: 1939b, ‘Preliminary Notes on the Development of Wings in Normal and Mutant Strains ofDrosophila’,Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 25, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waddington, C. H.: 1940,Organisers and Genes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  36. Waddington, C. H.: 1942, ‘Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters’,Nature 150, 563–564.Google Scholar
  37. Waddington, C. H.: 1956,Principles of Embryology, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Waddington, C. H.: 1957,The Strategy of the Genes, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  39. Waddington, C. H.: 1959, ‘Canalization of Development and Genetic Assimilation of an Acquired Character’,Nature 183, 1654–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Waddington, C. H.: 1961, ‘Genetic Assimilation’,Advances in Genetics 10, 257–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waddington, C. H.: 1962,New Patterns in Genetics and Development, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Waddington, C. H.: 1970,Behind Appearances, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  43. Waddington, C. H.: 1974, ‘A Catastrophe Theory of Evolution’,Annals of the New York Acadamy of Science.231, 32–42.Google Scholar
  44. Waddington, C. H.: 1975,The Evolution of an Evolutionist, Cornell University Press, Ithica.Google Scholar
  45. Waddington, C. H., J. Needham, and J. Brachet: 1936, ‘The Activation of the Evocator’,Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B 120, 173–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weiss, P.: 1962, ‘From Cell to Molecule’, in J. H. Allen (ed.),Molecular Control of Cellular Activity, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 1–72.Google Scholar
  47. Weissman, A.: 1893,The Germ-Plasm: A Theory of Heredity, W. N. Parker and H. Ronnfeld (trans.), Walter Scott, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott F. Gilbert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologySwarthmore CollegeSwarthmoreUSA

Personalised recommendations