Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 125–134 | Cite as

Pictorial representation in biology

  • Peter J. Taylor
  • Ann S. Blum


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blum, A. S.: 1991,A Better Style of Art: Illustrations for Nineteenth-Century American Zoology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. Darwin, C.: 1872,The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  3. Fyfe, G., and J. Law: 1988,Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Galton, F.: 1880, ‘Visualised Numerals’,Nature 21, 252–256.Google Scholar
  5. Giere, R.: 1988,Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Gilbert, G.N., and M. Mulkay: 1984,Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Gombrich, E.: 1961,Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Griesemer, J., and W. Wimsatt: 1989, ‘Picturing Weismannism: A Case Study of Conceptual Evolution’, in M. Ruse (ed.),What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays for David Hull, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 75–137.Google Scholar
  9. Hesse, M.: 1966,Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  10. Knorr-Cetina, K., and K. Amann: 1990, ‘Image Dissection in Natural Scientific Inquiry’,Science, Technology & Human Values 15, 259–283.Google Scholar
  11. Latour, B., and J. de Noblet (eds.): 1985,Les ‘Vues’ de l'Esprit, Special Issue ofCulture Technique 14.Google Scholar
  12. Law, J., and M. Lynch: 1988, ‘Lists, Field Guides, and the Descriptive Organization of Seeing: Birdwatching as an Exemplary Observation Activity’,Human Studies 11, 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynch, M.: 1985, ‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility’,Social Studies of Science 15, 37–66.Google Scholar
  14. Lynch, M., and S. Y. Edgerton, Jr.: 1988, ‘Aesthetics and Digital Image Processing: Representational Craft in Contemporary Astronomy’, in G. Fyfe and J. Law (eds.),Picturing Power: Visual Depictions and Social Relations, Routledge, London, pp. 184–220.Google Scholar
  15. Lynch, M., and S. Woolgar (eds.): 1988a,Representation in Scientific Practice, Special Issue ofHuman Studies 11 (2/3).Google Scholar
  16. Lynch, M., and S. Woolgar: 1988b, ‘Introduction: Sociological Orientations to Representational Practice in Science’,Human Studies 11, 99–116.Google Scholar
  17. Mitchell, W. J. T.: 1986,Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Ripley, G., and C. A. Dana (eds.): 1870, Photography, inThe New American Encyclopedia: A Popular Dictionary of General Knowledge 13, D. Appleton and Company, New York, p. 291.Google Scholar
  19. Rudwick, M.: 1976, ‘The Emergence of Visual Language for Geological Science, 1760–1840’,History of Science 14, 149–195.Google Scholar
  20. Rudwick, M.: 1985,The Great Devonian Controversy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Tirtha, B. K.: 1965,Vedic Mathematics, Hindu Vishvavidyalaya Sanskrit Publication Board, Varanasi.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, P. L., R. Warwick, M. Dyson, and L. H. Bannister (eds.): 1989,Gray's Anatomy, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  23. Wittgenstein, L.: 1958,Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Taylor
    • 1
  • Ann S. Blum
    • 2
  1. 1.Program on Science, Technology & SocietyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of HistoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations