Advertisement

Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 287–301 | Cite as

Does evolutionary biology contribute to ethics?

  • Patrick Bateson
Article

Abstract

Human propensities that are the products of Darwinian evolution may combine to generate a form of social behavior that is not itself a direct result of such pressure. This possibility may provide a satisfying explanation for the origin of socially transmitted rules such as the incest taboo. Similarly, the regulatory processes of development that generated adaptations to the environment in the circumstances in which they evolved can produce surprising and sometimes maladaptive consequences for the individual in modern conditions. These combinatorial aspects of social and developmental dynamics leave a subtle but not wholly uninteresting role for evolutionary biology in explaining the origins of human morality.

Keywords

Evolution Incest Taboo Ethics Behavioral Development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R. D.: 1980,Darwinism and human affairs. London, Pitman.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, P.: 1982, ‘Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail’.Nature 295, 236–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson, P., ed.: 1983a,Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson, P.: 1983b, ‘Optimal outbreeding’, in P. Bateson (ed.)Mate Choice, pp. 257–277. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, P.: 1983c, ‘Rules for changing the rules’, in D. S. Bendall (ed.)Evolution from Molecules to Men, pp. 483–507. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Bateson, P.: 1984, ‘Sudden changes in ontogeny and phylogeny’. in G. Greenberg and E. Tobach (eds.)Behavioral Evolution and Integrative Levels, pp. 155–166. T. C. Schneirla Conference Series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  7. Bateson, P.: 1986, ‘Sociobiology and human politics’, in S. Rose and L. Appignanesi (eds.)Science and Beyond, pp. 79–99. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Bateson, P.: 1987, ‘Biological approaches to the study of behavioural development’.International Journal of Behavioral Devleopment 10, 1–22.Google Scholar
  9. Bateson, P.: 1988, ‘The biological evolution of cooperation and trust’. In D. Gambetta (ed.)Trust, pp. 14–30. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Bateson, P. P. G.: 1989, ‘Preferences for close relations in Japanese quail.’Proceedings of the 19th Ornithological Congress, 1986, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  11. Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. and Turke, P., eds.: 1988,Human reproductive behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J.: 1985,Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Changeux, J.-P.: 1983,L'homme Neuronal. Fayard, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Charlesworth, B.: 1978, ‘Some models of the evolution of altruistic behaviour between siblings’.Journal of Theoretical Biology 72, 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawkins, R.: 1976,The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Dawkins, R.: 1982,The Extended Phenotype. Freeman, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Dawkins, R.: 1986,The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, Harlow, Essex.Google Scholar
  18. Durham, W. H. (in press)Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
  19. Finkelhor, D.: 1980, ‘Sex among siblings: A survey on prevalence, variety, and effects’.Archives of Sexual Behavior 9, 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frisch, R. E.: 1978, ‘Population, food intake and fertility.’Science 199, 22–30.Google Scholar
  21. Hinde, R. A.: 1987,Individuals, Relationships and Culture: Links between Ethology and the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Hopkins, K.: 1980, ‘Brother-sister marriage in Roman Egypt’Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, 303–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huxley, T. H. and Huxley, J.: 1947,Evolution and Ethics 1893-1943. Pilot Press, London.Google Scholar
  24. Immelmann, K.: 1972, ‘Sexual and other long-term aspects of imprinting in birds and other species’.Advances in the Study of Behavior 4, 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Immelmann, K.: 1984, ‘The natural history of bird learning’. in P. Marler and H. S. Terrace (eds.)The Biology of Learning, pp. 271–288. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Kelleher, R. T.: 1966, ‘Chaining and conditioned reinforcement’, in W. K. Honig (ed.) Operant Behavior, pp. 160–212. Appleton Century Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kitcher, P.: 1985,Vaulting Ambition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  28. Kitcher, P.: 1987, ‘Confessions of a curmudgeon.’Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, 89–99.Google Scholar
  29. Kruijt, J. P., ten Cate, C. J. and Meeuwissen, G. B.: 1982, ‘The influence of siblings on the development of sexual preferences of male zebra finches.’Developmental Psychobiology 16, 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lumsden, C. J. and Wilson, E. O.: 1981,Genes, Minds, and Culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  31. Ruse, M.: 1986,Taking Darwin Seriously: a naturalistic approach to philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Shepher, J.: 1971, ‘Mate selection among second generation kibbutz adolscents and adults: Incest avoidance and negative imprinting.’Archives of Sexual Behavior 1, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Talmon, Y.: 1964, ‘Mate selection in collective settlements.’American Sociological Review 29, 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van den Berghe, P. L.: 1983, ‘Human inbreeding avoidance: Culture in nature’.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6, 91–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weinberg, S. K.: 1956,Incest Behavior. Citadel, Secaucus, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  36. Westermarck, E.: 1891,The History of Human Marriage. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, B. A. O.: 1978, ‘Conclusion’, in G. S. Stent (ed.)Morality as a biological phenomenon, pp. 309–20. Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, B.: 1983, ‘Evolution, ethics, and the representation problem’, in D. S. Bendall (ed.)Evolution from Molecules to Men, pp. 555–566. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, E. O.: 1976, ‘Author's reply to multiple review of “Sociobiology””,Animal Behaviour 24, 716–718.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, E. O.: 1978,On Human Nature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  41. Wolf, A. P. and Huang, C.: 1980,Marriage and adoption in China. 1845-1945. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
  42. Wuketits, F. M., ed.: 1984,Concepts and approaches in evolutionary epistemology: towards an evolutionary theory of knowledge. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Bateson
    • 1
  1. 1.Sub-Department of Animal BehaviourUniversity of CambridgeMadingley CambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations