Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 255–273 | Cite as

The non-existence of a principle of natural selection

  • Abner Shimony
Article

Abstract

The theory of natural selection is a rich systematization of biological knowledge without a first principle. When formulations of a proposed principle of natural selection are examined carefully, each is seen to be exhaustively analyzable into a proposition about sources of fitness and a proposition about consequences of fitness. But whenever the fitness of an organic variety is well defined in a given biological situation, its sources are local contingencies together with the background of laws from disciplines other than the theory of natural selection; and the consequences of fitness for the long range fate of organic varieties are essentially applications of probability theory. Hence there is no role and no need for a principle of the theory of natural selection, and any generalities that may hold in that theory are derivative rather than fundamental.

Key words

Natural Selection Evolution Principle Probability Propensity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, P. W.: 1984,Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Brandon, R.: 1978, ‘Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory,’Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 9, 181–206. Reprinted in Sober (1984a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Careri, G.: 1984,Order and Disorder in Matter, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R.: ‘The Two concepts of Probability,’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5, 513–532.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C.: 1943,The Origin of Species, Modern Library, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, R. A.: 1958,The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Hopf, E.: 1934, ‘On Causality, Statistics and Probability,’Journal of Mathematics and Physics 17, 51–102.Google Scholar
  8. Kimura, M.: 1968, ‘Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level,’Nature 217, 624–626.Google Scholar
  9. King, J. L. and T. H. Jukes: 1969, ‘Non-Darwinian Evolution,’Science 164, 788–798.Google Scholar
  10. Levins, R.: 1966, ‘The Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology.American Scientist 54, 421–431. Reprinted in Sober (1984a).Google Scholar
  11. Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Mills, S. and J. Beatty: 1979, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness,’Philosophy of Science 46, 263–286. Reprinted in Sober (1984a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Monod, J.: 1971,Chance and Necessity, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Muller, H. J.: 1950, ‘Evidence of the Precision of Genetic Adaptation,’The Harvey Lectures, 1974-8, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 165–229.Google Scholar
  15. Peirce, C. S.: 1877, ‘The Fixation of Belief,’Popular Science Monthly 12, 1–15. Reprinted in C. S. Peirce: 1934, Collected Papers V, C. Harthorne and P. Weiss, (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Peirce, C. S.: 1932,Collected Papers II, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Plato, J. von: 1982, ‘Probability and Determinism,’Philosophy of Science 49, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poincaré, H., 1913,The Foundations of Science, The Science Press, Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, K.: 1957, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability, and the Quantum Theory,’ inObservation and Interpretation, S. Körner (ed.), Butterworths Scientific Publications, London.Google Scholar
  20. Prigogine, I. and I. Stengers: 1984,Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature, Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Reichenbach, H.: 1938,Experience and Prediction, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Shimony, A.: 1970, ‘Scientific Inference,’ inThe Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, R. G. Colodny (ed.), Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  23. Shimony, A: 1989, ‘The Theory of Natural Selection as a Null Theory,’ inStatistics in Science, D. Costantini and R. Cooke (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  24. Simpson, G. G.: 1963,This View of Life: The World of an Evolutionist, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Sober, E.: 1984,The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Sober, E. (ed.): 1984a,Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Stebbins, G. L.: 1982, ‘Modal Themes: A New Framework in Evolutionary Synthesis,’ inPerspectives in Evolution, R. Milkman (ed.), Sinaur, Sunderland, MD.Google Scholar
  28. Waddington, C. H.: 1957,The Strategy of the Genes, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abner Shimony
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Philosophy and PhysicsBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations