Asymmetry and resolution of the synaptonemal complex in the XY pair ofChinchilla laniger
- 33 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
The meiotic behavior of the XY pair of the chinchilla (C. laniger), has been studied with C-banding and with the microspreading procedure for synaptonemal complex (SC) karyotyping. The large X chromosome of the chinchilla has a paracentromeric and two subterminal (stl and st2) C+ bands, while the minute Y chromosome has a C+ long arm. At metaphase-I the X chromosome is associated end-to-end with the short arm of the Y chromosome. The appearance of the X axis in microspread spermatocytes is delayed up to early pachytene. The X axis, as well as the Y axis appear as thick, separated threads. The thick X and Y axes are then co-aligned without forming a SC. The Y axis becomes thinner and then an asymmetrical SC is formed between the axes. This SC becomes symmetrical by a later thinning of the corresponding part of the X axis. During mid-pachytene an additional SC is formed at the other end of the XY pair in many cells. During late pachytene the SCs become resolved and finally the four termini are separated from each other although they tend to be located in the same region of the nucleus. These observations suggest that the SCs in the XY pair of the chinchilla are formed between non-homologous regions. The presence of non-homologous synapsis suggests that the XY pair ofC. laniger is joined by an achiasmatic mechanism, different from the chiasmatic joining usually found in eutherian mammals. The presence of subterminal C+ bands in the X chromosome may be a hindrance for the formation of a SC during early pachytene. It is concluded that the XY pair of the chinchilla shows an intermediate behavior when compared to that of the sand rat on one side, and that of most mammals having a euchromatic X chromosome, on the other side.
Keywords
Synaptonemal Complex Eutherian Mammal Meiotic Behavior Intermediate Behavior Early PachytenePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Arrighi, F. E., Hsu, T. C., Pathak, S. & Sawada, H., 1974, The sex chromosomes of the Chinese hamster: constitutive heterochromatin deficient in repetitive DNA sequences. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 13: 268–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans, E. P., Breckon, G. & Ford, C. E., 1964. An air-drying method for meiotic preparations from mammalian testes. Cytogenetics 3: 289–294.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, H. L., 1977. Localized chiasmata due to partial pairing: a 3-D reconstruction of synaptonemal complexes in male Stethophyma grossum. Chromosoma 65: 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fredga, K., 1970. Unusual sex chromosome inheritance in mammals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (Lond.) B. 259: 15–36.Google Scholar
- Fredga, K. & Santesson, B., 1964. Male meiosis in the Syrian, Chinese and European hamsters. Hereditas 52: 36–48.Google Scholar
- Galton, M., Benirschke, K. & Ohno, S., 1965. Sex chromosomes of the chinchilla: Allocycly and duplication sequence in somatic cells and behavior in meiosis. Chromosoma 16: 668–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillies, C. B., 1974. The nature and extent of synaptonemal complex formation in haploid barley. Chromosoma 48: 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones, G. H., 1973. Light and electron microscopical studies of chromosome pairing in relation to chiasma localization in Stethophyma grossum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Chromosoma 42: 145–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lavappa, K. S. & Yerganian, G., 1970. Spermatogonial and meiotic chromosomes of the Armenian hamster, Cricetulus migratorius. Expl Cell Res. 61: 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moses, M. J., 1977a. Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chines hamster (Cricetulus griseus). 1. Morphology of the autosomal complement in spread populations. Chromosoma 60: 99–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moses, M. J., 1977b. Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chines hamster (Cricetulus griseus). 11. Morphology of the XY pair in spread preparations. Chromosoma 60: 127–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moses, M. J., Slatton, G. H., Gambling, T. M. & Starmer, C. F., 1977. Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chines hamster (Cricetulus griseus). III. Quantitative evaluation. Chromosoma 60: 345–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moses, M. J. & Poorman, P. A., 1981. Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. II. Synaptic adjustment in a tandem duplication. Chromosoma 81: 519–535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moses, M. J., Poorman, P. A., Roderick, T. H. & Davisson, M. T., 1982. Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. IV. Synapsis and synaptic adjustment in two paracentric inversions. Chromosoma 84: 457–474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohno, S., Beçak, W. & Beçak, M. L., 1964. X-autosome ratio and the behavior pattern of individual X chromosomes in placental mammals. Chromosoma 15: 14–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Polani, P., 1982. Pairing of X and Y chromosomes, non-inactivation of X-linked genes, and the maleness factor. Hum. Genet. 60: 207–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rasmussen, S. W. & Holm, P. B., 1979. Chromosome pairing in autotetraploid Bombyx females. Mechanism for exclusive bivalent formation. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 44: 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharma, T., Gadi, I. K. & Raman, R., 1981. Similarity in the G-band patterns of constitutive heterochromatin in the composite X and Y chromosomes of certain rodents. Genetica 54: 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Solari, A. J., 1964. The morphology and ultrastructure of the sex vesicle in the mouse. Expl Cell Res. 36: 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Solari, A. J., 1969. The evolution of the ultrastructure of the sex chromosomes (sex vesicle) during meiotic prophase in mouse spermatocytes. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 27: 289–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solari, A. J., 1970. The spatial relationship of the X and Y chromosomes during meiotic prophase in mouse spermatocytes. Chromosoma 29: 217–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solari, A. J., 1974a. The behavior of the XY pair in mammals. Inc. Rev. Cytol. 38: 273–317.Google Scholar
- Solari, A. J., 1974b. The relationship between chromosomes and axes in the chiasmatic XY pair of the Armenian hamster (Cricetulus migratorius). Chromosoma 48: 89–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solari, A. J., 1979. Meiotic behavior of sex chromosomes. Rev. Microsc. électron. 6: 37–44Google Scholar
- Solari, A. J., 1980. Synaptonemal complexes and associated structures in microspread human spermatocytes. Chromosoma 81: 315–337.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solari, A. J. & Ashley, T., 1977. Ultrastructure and behavior of the achiasmatic, telosynaptic XY pair of the sand rat (Psammomys obesus). Chromosoma 62: 319–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solari, A. J. & Bianchi, N., 1975. The synaptic behavior of the X and Y chromosomes in the marsupial Monodelphis dimidiata. Chromosoma 52: 11–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sumner, A. T., 1972. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Expl Cell Res. 75: 304–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vidal, O. R., Riva, R. & Spirito, S., 1973. Los cromosomas de Chinchilla brevicaudata. Contribución a la sistematica de genero Chinchilla (Rodentia. Chinchillidae). Physis 32 141–150.Google Scholar
- Zenzes, M. T. & Wolf, U., 1971. Paarungsverhalten der Ge schlechtschromosomen in der männlichen Meiose von Mi crocus agrestis. Chromosoma 33: 41–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar