Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 3–36 | Cite as

Modeling in the museum: On the role of remnant models in the work of Joseph Grinnell

  • James R. Griesemer


Accounts of the relation between theories and models in biology concentrate on mathematical models. In this paper I consider the dual role of models as representations of natural systems and as a material basis for theorizing. In order to explicate the dual role, I develop the concept of a remnant model, a material entity made from parts of the natural system(s) under study. I present a case study of an important but neglected naturalist, Joseph Grinnell, to illustrate the extent to which mundane practices in a museum setting constitute theorizing. I speculate that historical and sociological analyses of institutions can play a specific role in the philosophical analysis of model-building strategies.

Key words

Material models semantic view of theories natural history ecology evolution museums Joseph Grinnell 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achinstein, P.: 1968,Concepts of Science, A Philosophical Analysis, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, E.: 1979,Museums in Motion, An Introduction to the History and Functions of Museums, American Association for State and Local History, Nashville.Google Scholar
  3. Allee, W., A. Emerson, O. Park, T. Park, and K. Schmidt: 1949,Principles of Animal Ecology, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  4. Beatty, J.: 1980, ‘Optimal-design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology’,Philosophy of Science 47, 532–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beatty, J.: 1981, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?’, in R. Giere and P. Asquith (eds.),PSA 1980, Volume 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 397–426.Google Scholar
  6. Beatty, J.: 1986, ‘The Synthesis and the Synthetic Theory’, in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 125–135.Google Scholar
  7. Beatty, J.: 1987, ‘On Behalf of the Semantic View’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, M.: 1962,Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  9. Braithwaite, R.: 1953,Scientific Explanation, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Byerly, H.: 1969, ‘Model-Structures and Model-Objects’,British Journal of Philosophy of Science 20, 135–144.Google Scholar
  11. Carnap, R.: 1942,Introduction to Semantics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, reprinted in 1968.Google Scholar
  12. Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Cartwright, N. and H. Mendell: 1984, ‘What Makes Physics' Objects Abstract?’, in J. Cushing, C. Delaney, and G. Gutting (eds.),Science and Reality: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 134–152.Google Scholar
  14. Colbert, E.: 1961, ‘What is a Museum?’,Curator 4, 138–146.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, J. and T. Case, eds.: 1986,Community Ecology, Harper & Row Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Duhem, P.: 1954,The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, P. Wiener (transl.), Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  17. Eakin, R.: 1956, ‘History of Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley’,Bios 27, 66–92.Google Scholar
  18. Eakin, R.: 1988,History of Zoology at Berkeley, Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley (copies available from the department).Google Scholar
  19. Giere, R.: 1979,Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Giere, R.: 1988a,Explaining Science, A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Giere, R.: 1988b, ‘Laws, Theories, and Generalization’, in A. Grünbaum and W. Salmon (eds.),The Limitations of Deductivism, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 37–46.Google Scholar
  22. Goodman, N.: 1976,Languages of Art, An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  23. Griesemer, J.: 1984, ‘Presentations and the Status of Theories’, in P. Asquith and P. Kitcher (eds.),PSA 1984, Volume 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 102–114.Google Scholar
  24. Griesemer, J.: 1988, ‘Causal Explanation in Ecology: The Case of Competitive Indeterminacy’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.),PSA 1988, Volume 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 337–344.Google Scholar
  25. Griesemer, J. and M. Wade: 1988, ‘Laboratory Models, Causal Explanation and Group Selection’,Biology and Philosophy 3 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griesemer, J. and W. Wimsatt: 1989, ‘Picturing Weismannism: A Case Study of Conceptual Evolution’, in M. Ruse, (ed).,What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays for David Hull, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 75–137.Google Scholar
  27. Grinnell, H.: 1940, ‘Joseph Grinnell: 1877–1939’,The Condor 42, 3–34.Google Scholar
  28. Grinnell, H.: 1958,Annie Montague Alexander, Grinnell Naturalists Society, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  29. Grinnell, J.: 1904, ‘The Origin and Distribution of the Chestnut-backed Chickadee’,The Auk 21, 364–365, 368–378, reprinted in Grinnell 1943.Google Scholar
  30. Grinnell, J.: 1910a, ‘Composition of the Prince William Sound Avifauna; Discussion of its Origin’, University of California Publications in Zoology, Volume 5, pp. 419–428, reprinted in J. Grinnell 1943.Google Scholar
  31. Grinnell, J.: 1910b, ‘The Methods and Uses of a Research Museum’,The Popular Science Monthly 77, 163–169, reprinted in J. Grinnell 1943.Google Scholar
  32. Grinnell, J.: 1914a, ‘An Account of the Mammals and Birds of the Lower Colorado Valley with Especial Reference to the Distributional Problems Presented’, University of California Publications in Zoology, Volume 12, pp. 51–294.Google Scholar
  33. Grinnell, J.: 1914b, ‘Barriers to Distribution as Regards Birds and Mammals’,American Naturalist 48, 248–254, reprinted in J. Grinnell 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grinnell, J.: 1916, ‘An analysis of the Vertebrate Fauna of the Trinity Region of Northern California’, University of California Publications in Zoology, Volume 12, pp. 399–410.Google Scholar
  35. Grinnell, J.: 1917a, ‘The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher’,The Auk 34, 427–433.Google Scholar
  36. Grinnell, J.: 1917b, ‘Field Tests of Theories Concerning Distributional Control’,American Naturalist 51, 115–128, reprinted in J. Grinnell 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grinnell, J.: 1922, ‘The Role of the “Accidental”’,The Auk 39, 373–380.Google Scholar
  38. Grinnell, J.: 1924, ‘Geography and Evolution’,Ecology 5, 225–229, reprinted in J. Grinnell 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grinnell, J.: 1927, ‘The Designation of Birds' Ranges’,The Auk 44, 322–325.Google Scholar
  40. Grinnell, J.: 1928a, ‘Presence and Absence of Animals’, University of California Chronicle, Volume 30, pp. 429–450, reprinted in J. Grinnell 1943.Google Scholar
  41. Grinnell, J.: 1928b, ‘A Distributional Summation of the Ornithology of Lower California’, University of California Publications in Zoology, Volume 32, pp. 1–300, excerpt reprinted in Grinnell 1943 as ‘Differentiation Areas’.Google Scholar
  42. Grinnell, J.: 1943,Joseph Grinnell's Philosophy of Nature, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  43. Grinnell, J., J. Dixon, and J. Linsdale: 1930, ‘Vertebrate Natural History of a Section of Northern California through the Lassen Peak Region’, University of California Publications in Zoology, Volume 35, pp. 1–594.Google Scholar
  44. Hacking, I.: 1983,Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  45. Hall, E.: 1962,Collecting and Preparing Study Specimens of Vertebrates, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  46. Hall, E. and J. Grinnell: 1919, ‘Life-zone Indicators in California’, Proceedings of the California Academy of Science, 4th Series, Volume 9, pp. 37–67.Google Scholar
  47. Hempel, C.: 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Herman, S.: 1986,The Naturalist's Field Journal, A Manual of Instruction Based on a System Established by Joseph Grinnell, Buteo Books, Vermillion, South Dakota.Google Scholar
  49. Hesse, M.: 1966,Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  50. Hintikka, J.: 1988, ‘On the Development of the Model-Theoretic Viewpoint in Logical Theory’,Synthese 77, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hutchinson, G.: 1978,An Introduction to Population Ecology, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  52. Jordan, D.: 1905, ‘The Origin of Species Through Isolation’,Science 22, 545–562.Google Scholar
  53. Kellogg, L.: 1916, ‘Report Upon Mammals and Birds Found in Portions of Trinity, Siskiyou and Shasta Counties, California’, University of California Publications in Zoology, Volume 12, pp. 335–398.Google Scholar
  54. Kiester, A.: 1980, ‘Natural Kinds, Natural History and Ecology’,Synthese 43, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leatherdale, W.: 1974,The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor in Science, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  56. Levins, R.: 1966, ‘The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology’,American Scientist 54, 421–431.Google Scholar
  57. Levins, R.: 1968,Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  58. Linsdale, J.: 1942, ‘In Memoriam: Joseph Grinnell’,The Auk 59, 268–285.Google Scholar
  59. Lloyd, E.: 1983, ‘The Nature of Darwin's Support for the Theory of Natural Selection’,Philosophy of Science 50, 112–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lloyd, E.: 1984, ‘A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics’,Philosophy of Science 51, 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lloyd, E.: 1986, ‘Evaluation of Evidence in Group Selection Debates’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.),PSA 1986, Volume 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 483–493.Google Scholar
  62. Lloyd, E.: 1987, ‘Response to Sloep and Van der Steen’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lloyd, E.: 1988,The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Greenwood Press, Westport.Google Scholar
  64. MacArthur, J.: 1972,Geographical Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  65. Magnus, D.: 1989,In Defense of Natural History: David Starr Jordan and the Role of Isolation in Evolution, Ph.D. Dissertation, History of Science Program, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  66. Maienschein, J., R. Rainger, and K. Benson: 1981, ‘Introduction: Were American Morphologists in Revolt?’,Journal of the History of Biology 14, 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mayr, E.: 1973, ‘Alden Holmes Miller’, inBiographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Science, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 176–214.Google Scholar
  68. Mayr, E.: 1976,Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  69. Mayr, E.: 1980, ‘Prologue: Some Thoughts on the History of the Evolutionary Synthesis’, in E. Mayr and W. Provine (eds.),The Evolutionary Synthesis, Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
  70. Merriam, C.: 1892, ‘The Geographic Distribution of Life in North America with Special Reference to the Mammalia’, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Volume 7, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
  71. Merriam, C.: 1894, ‘Laws of Temperature Control of the Geographic Distribution of Terrestrial Animals and Plants’,National Geographic Magazine 6, 229–238.Google Scholar
  72. Merriam, C.: 1899, ‘Results of a Biological Survey of Mount Shasta, Northern California’,North American Fauna, Volume 16, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of the Biological Survey, pp. 1–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miller, A.: 1955, ‘Concepts and Problems of Avian Systematics in Relation to Evolutionary Processes’, in A. Wolfson (ed.),Recent Studies in Avian Biology, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  74. Miller, A.: 1964, ‘Joseph Grinnell’,Systematic Zoology 13, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, 2nd ed., 1979, Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  76. Pearce, D.: 1981, ‘Is There Any Theoretical Justification for a Nonstatement View of Theories?’,Synthese 46, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rainger, R.: 1986, ‘Just Before Simpson: William Diller Matthew's Understanding of Evolution’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Volume 130, pp. 453–474.Google Scholar
  78. Roughgarden, J., R. May, and S. Levin, eds.: 1989,Perspectives in Ecological Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  79. Ruse, M.: 1973a, ‘The Value of Analogical Models in Science’,Dialogue 12, 246–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ruse, M.: 1973b, ‘The Nature of Scientific Models: Formal v Material Analogy’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 3, 63–80.Google Scholar
  81. Ruse, M.: 1975, ‘Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution: An Analysis’,Journal of the History of Biology 8, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schoener, T.: 1989, ‘The Ecological Niche’,Ecological Concepts, Ch. 4, Blackwell Scientific Publishers, London, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  83. Shelford, V.: 1932, ‘Life Zones, Modern Ecology, and the Failure of Temperature Summing’,Wilson Bulletin 44, 144–157.Google Scholar
  84. Smith, M.: 1987,Pacific Visions, California Scientists and the Environment, 1850–1915, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  85. Star, S.: 1983, ‘Simplification and Scientific Work: An Example from Neuroscience Research’,Social Studies of Science 13, 205–228.Google Scholar
  86. Star, S. and J. Griesemer: 1989, ‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations,” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939’,Scial Studies of Science 19, 387–420.Google Scholar
  87. Sterling, K.: 1977,Last of the Naturalists: The Career of C. Hart Merriam, Arno Press, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Stocking, G.: 1983, ‘Essays on Museums and Material Culture’, in G. Stocking, Jr. (ed.),Objects and Others, Essays on Museums and Material Culture, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  89. Strong, D., D. Simberloff, L. Abele, and A. Thistle, eds: 1984,Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  90. Suppe, F.: 1972, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories?’,Philosophy of Science 39, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Suppe, F.: 1977a, ‘The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories’, in F. Sppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 3–232.Google Scholar
  92. Suppe, F.: 1977b, ‘Afterword — 1977’, in F. Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 615–730.Google Scholar
  93. Suppe, F.: 1979, ‘Theory Structure’, in P. Asquith and H. Kyburg, Jr. (eds.),Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 317–338.Google Scholar
  94. Suppe, F.: 1988, ‘A Nondeductivist Approach to Theoretical Explanation’, in A. Grünbaum and W. Salmon (eds.),The Limitations of Deductivism, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 128–166.Google Scholar
  95. Suppe, F.: 1989,The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, University of Illionis Press, Urbana, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  96. Suppes, P.: 1960, ‘A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences’,Synthese 12, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Suppes, P.: 1962, ‘Models of Data’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 252–261.Google Scholar
  98. Suppes, P.: 1967, ‘What is a Scientific Theory?’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.),Philosophy of Science Today, Basic Books Inc., New York, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
  99. Suppes, P.: 1977, ‘The Structure of Theories and the Analysis of Data’, in F. Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 266–283.Google Scholar
  100. Thompson, P.: 1983, ‘The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Approach’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Thompson, P.: 1987, ‘A Defence of the Semantic Conception of Evolutionary Theory’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thompson, P.: 1988,The Structure of Biological Theories, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  103. van Fraassen, B.: 1972, ‘A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science’, in R. Colodny (ed.),Paradigms & Paradoxes, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  104. van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  105. van Fraassen, B.: 1981, ‘Theory Construction and Experiment: An Empiricist View’, in R. Giere and P. Asquith (eds.),PSA 1980, Volume 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  106. Waters, C. K.: 1986, ‘Taking Analogical Inference Seriously: Darwin's Argument From Artificial Selection’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.),PSA 1986, Volume 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 502–513.Google Scholar
  107. Wimsatt, W.: 1980, ‘Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy’, in T. Nickles (ed.),Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 213–259.Google Scholar
  108. Wimsatt, W.: 1981, ‘Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination’, in M. Brewer and B. Collins (eds.),Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 124–163.Google Scholar
  109. Wimsatt, W.: 1986, ‘False Models as Means to Truer Theories’, in M. Nitecki and A. Hoffman (eds.),Neutral Models in Biology, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Griesemer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of California DavisU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations