Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 151, Issue 1–2, pp 131–140 | Cite as

Allozyme divergence and evolution in the genusLens

  • Ronit Pinkas
  • Daniel Zamir
  • Gideon Ladizinsky


The genusLens includes 5 taxonomic species:L. culinaris is cultivated andL. orientalis, L. odemensis, L. ervoides, andL. nigricans are wild. All the species are annual and almost exlusively selfers. The wild lentils are distributed over a large geographical area and form small disjunct populations which are composed of a small number of plants. 67Lens populations were assayed electrophoretically for 9 enzyme systems; 15 enzymic genes with 37 alleles were identified. The genetic distances (D) measured between the pairs of populations indicated a significantly greater similarity between populations belonging to the same taxonomic species. Assuming the populations represent a random sample of the variability in each of the species the genetic distances (D) between the 5 taxa were calculated. The shortest genetic distance was found betweenL. orientalis andL. culinaris. Another significant feature of the data is the apparent isolation ofL. nigricans from the other 4 species. The genetic distances between theLens species are compared to the patterns of crossability barriers between them.

Key Words

Angiosperms Leguminosae Lens. — Systematics allozymes reproductive barriers domestication 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barulina, H., 1930: Lentil of the USSR and of other countries. — Bull. Appl. Bot. Genet. Plant Breeding Suppl.40, 1–319.Google Scholar
  2. Gottlieb, L. D., 1981a: Electrophoretic evidence and plant population. — Prog. Phytochem.7, 1–46.Google Scholar
  3. —— 1981b: Gene number in species ofAstereae that have different chromosome numbers. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.78, 3726–3729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hartigan, J., 1981: Cluster analysis of variables. — InDixon, W. J., Brown, M. D., (Eds.): Biomedical Computer Programs, BMDP series, 447 – 455. — University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ladizinsky, G., 1979: The origin of lentil and its wild gene pool. — Euphytica28, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —— 1985: Founder effect in crop-plant evolution. — Econ. Bot.39, 191–199.Google Scholar
  7. ——, 1984: The biological species of the genusLens. — Bot. Gaz.145, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. — Amer. Nat.106, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —— 1974: Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. — Genetics76, 379–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Renfrew, J. M., 1969: The archeological evidence for the domestication of plants: methods and problems. — InUcko, P. J., Dimbleby, G. W., (Eds.): The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, 149–172. — Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  11. Skibinski, D. O. F., Rasool, D., Erskine, W., 1984: Aspartate aminotransferase allozyme variation in a germplasm collection of the domesticated lentil (Lens culinaris). — Theor. Appl. Genet.68, 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vallejos, C. E., 1983: Enzyme activity staining. — InTanksley, S. D., Orton, T. J., (Eds.): Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding (A), 469–516. — Amsterdam: Elsevier Co.Google Scholar
  13. Zamir, D., Ladizinsky, G., 1984: Genetics of allozyme variants and linkage groups in lentil. — Euphytica33, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronit Pinkas
    • 1
  • Daniel Zamir
    • 1
  • Gideon Ladizinsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Field and Vegetable Crops, Faculty of AgricultureThe Hebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations