Some arithmetical questions in the theory of the base

« Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. », 41, (1946), p. 187; « Rev. Univ. Tucuman », 5, (1946), p. 7. It is the latter work which is quoted in the sequel.Google Scholar

Arithmetical methods are, it seems, incapable of dealing with the problem in all its generality; thus they cannot in general reveal the existence of self-collineations, or continuous transformations, or transformations possessing certain kinds of exceptional elements (see § 18).Google Scholar

« Rend. Palermo », 30, (1910), p. 265. See alsoF. R. Sharpe andV. Snyder, « Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. », 1914–15; andT. G. Room, « Proc. Roy. Soc. » A 193, (1918), p. 25.Google Scholar

L. S. Goddard, « Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. », 44, (1948), p. 43.Google Scholar

« Rend. Lincei », (5), 15 (1906)₂, p. 665.Google Scholar

« Memorie Accad. d'Italia », 8, (1937), p. 23.Google Scholar

Scritti matematici offerti aL. Berzolari, (1936), p. 345.Google Scholar

Jessop,Quartic Surfaces, (Cambridge, 1916), Ch. IX.Google Scholar

SeeEnriques-Chisini,Teoria geometrica delle equazioni, Il, p. 191.Google Scholar

F. Severi, « Memorie Acc. Torino, (2), 52, (1903), p. 61 (§ 29).MATHGoogle Scholar

J. A. Todd, « Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. », 26, (1930), p. 323.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

The correspondence between a special type of quintic surface and Jacobian surface of quadrics has been studied by the writer: « Proc. London Math. Soc. », (2), 30, (1930), p. 425.Google Scholar

E. Ciani, « Rend. Palermo », 28, (1909), p. 217.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

This primal has been studied by the writer: see « Proc. London Math. Soc. », (2) 30, (1929), p. 118.Google Scholar