Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 379–387 | Cite as

Decreasing self-stimulatory behavior with physical exercise in a group of autistic boys

  • Robert G. Watters
  • Wilhelmina E. Watters
Article

Abstract

Five autistic boys were observed during 27 language training sessions. Each session followed one of three periods: (a) physical exercise, (b) TV watching, or (c) regular academic work. It was found that (a) the lowest levels of self-stimulation followed physical exercise, (b) there were no differences in the levels of self-stimulation following TV watching and following academics, and (c) the levels of correct question answering were not affected by the three different previous periods.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azrin, N. H., Kaplan, S. J., & Foxx, R. M. Autism reversal: Eliminating stereotyped self-stimulation of retarded individuals.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973,78, 241–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baroff, G. S., & Tate, B. G. The use of aversive stimulation in the treatment of chronic self-injurious behavior.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1968,7, 454–470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Case, H. W. Therapeutic methods in stuttering and speech blocking. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.),Behavior therapy and the neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon, 1960.Google Scholar
  4. Foxx, R. M., & Azrin, N. H. The elimination of autistic self-stimulatory behavior by over-correction.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973,6, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman, B. J., Moss, D., Somerset, T., & Ritvo, E. R. Thumbsucking in an autistic child overcome by overcorrelation.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1977,8, 211–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hain, R., & Lainer, H.Language rehabilitation program. New York: Teaching Resources, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, H. G. Continuation of Yates' treatment of tigueur. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.),Behavior therapy and the neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon, 1960.Google Scholar
  8. Klier, J., & Harris, S. L. Self-stimulation and learning in autistic children: Physical or functional incompatibility?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977,10, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koegel, R. L., & Covert, A. The relationship of self-stimulation to learning in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972,5, 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koegel, R. L., Firestone, P. B., Kramme, K. W., & Dunlap, G. Increasing spontaneous play by suppressing self-stimulation in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974,7, 521–528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovaas, O. I., Schaeffer, B., & Simmons, J. Q. Building social behavior in austistic children by use of electric shock.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1965,1, 99–109.Google Scholar
  12. Luiselli, J. K., Helfen, C. S., Pemberton, B. W., & Reisman, J. The elimination of a child's in-class masturbation by over correction and reinforcement.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1977,8, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacDonough, T. S., & Forehand, R. Response-contingent time out: Important parameters in behavior modification with children.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1973,4, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mulhern, T., & Baumeister, A. A. An experimental attempt to reduce stereotypy by reinforcement procedures.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1969,74, 69–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rafi, A. A. Learning theory and the treatment of tics.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1962,6, 71–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rimland, B.Infantile autism. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.Google Scholar
  17. Risley, T. R. The effects and side effects of punishing the autistic behaviors of a deviant child.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968,1, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
  19. Tate, B. G., & Baroff, G. S. Aversive control of self-injurious behavior in a psychotic boy.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1966,4, 281–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Walton, D. Massed practice and simultaneous reduction in drive level—further evidence of the efficacy of this approach to the treatment of tics. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.),Experiments in behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon, 1964.Google Scholar
  21. Wells, K. C., Forehand, R., Hickey, K., & Green, K. D. Effects of a procedure derived from the over correction principle on manipulated and nonmanipulated behaviors.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1977,10, 679–687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. White, G. D., Nielsen, G., & Johnson, S M. Timeout duration and the suppression of deviant behavior in children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972,5, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wooden, H. E. The use of negative practice to eliminate nocturnal head banging.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1974,5, 81–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yates, A. J. The application of learning theory to the treatment of tics.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958,56, 175–182.Google Scholar
  25. Yates, A. J.Behavior therapy. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Watters
    • 1
  • Wilhelmina E. Watters
    • 2
  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.M. F. McHugh SchoolOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations