Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 17, Issue 1–2, pp 105–109

In-plane determination of 3D-velocity vectors using particle tracking anemometry (PTA)

  • W. Stolz
  • J. Köhler
Originals

Abstract

A PTA-technique for the in-plane determination of the three flow velocity vector components based on the defocused imaging of stray-particles has been investigated. The conventional setup for 2-D PTA has been modified by broadening the laser light-sheet to a width of approximately 1.5 mm and focusing the imaging optics in a plane in front of the laser light-sheet. Particles in the light-sheet are imaged out of focus and the image size of a particle therefore depends on its distance to the focal plane of the imaging optics. The increase of the particle image diameter within single particle tracks due to the defocusing was used to determine the velocity component perpendicular to the light-sheet. The results obtained with this technique in a well defined laminar air flow are in good agreement with LDV-data.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamczyk AA;Rimai L (1988) Reconstruction of a 3-dimensional flow field from orthogonal views of seed track video images. Exp Fluids 6: 380–386Google Scholar
  2. Adrian RJ (1986) Image shifting technique to resolve directional ambiguity in double-pulsed velocimetry. Appl Opt 26: 3855Google Scholar
  3. Barker DB;Fourney ME (1977) Measuring fluid velocities with speckle patterns. Opt Lett 1: 135–137Google Scholar
  4. Cenedese A;Paglialunga A (1989) A new technique for the determination of the third velocity component with PIV, Exp Fluids 8: 228–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dinkelacker F;Schäfer M;Ketterle W;Wolfrum J;Stolz W;Köhler J (1992) Determination of the third velocity component with PTA using an intensity graded light sheet, Exp Fluids 13, 357–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Durst F;Melling A;Whitelaw JH (1981) Principles and practice of Laser-Doppler Anemometry, Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinsch K;Hinrichs H;Kuhfahl G;Meinlschmidt P (1991): Holographic recording of 3-D flow configurations for particle image velocimetry, SPIE-Vol, 1602, 121–30Google Scholar
  8. Hinsch K;Hinrichs H;Kuhfahl G;Meinlschmidt P (1990a) Particle image velocimetry (PIV) of 3-D flow configuration by holographic recording of a batch of light sheets, SPIE, Vol. 1319, 530–531Google Scholar
  9. Hinrichs H;Hinsch K;Kuhfahl G;Meinlschmidt P (1990b) 3-D velocity registration from optically processed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry records. SPIE, Vol. 1319, 542–543Google Scholar
  10. Kasagi N; Nishino K (1990) Probing turbulence with three-dimensional particle tracking velocimetry, Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Eng. Turb. Mod. and Meas, September 24–28, DubrovnikGoogle Scholar
  11. Köhler J; Gerblich K; Meinhardt P; Ziegler GFW (1990) 2-D flow velocity measurements under the condition of high straylight intensity using particle tracking anemometry, Intern. Symp. on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Dubrovnik, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Landreth CC;Adrian RJ;Yao CS (1988) Double pulsed particle image velocimeter with directional resolution for complex flows, Exp Fluids 6: 119–128Google Scholar
  13. Landreth CC,Adrian RJ (1988) Measurement and refinement of velocity data using high image density analysis in particle image velocimetry, 4th Int. Symp. on Appl. of Laser Anemometry to Fluid Mechanics, Ladoan, Institute Superior Technico, 1096 Codex, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  14. Miles RB;Nosenchuck RB (1989) Three-dimensional quantitative flow diagnostics. In: Advances in Fluid Mechanics Measurements, ed. Gad-el-Hak M, Lecture Notes in Engineering, New York, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  15. Nino E; Gajdeczko BF; Felton PG (1992) Two-color particle image velocimetry applied to a single cylinder two-stroke engine, SAE Paper 922309Google Scholar
  16. Peters F;Paikert B (1990) Particle image formation in speckle velocimetry tested by means of homogeneously condensed droplets. In: Flow visualization V, ed. Reznicek R, 72–77, Washington: HemisphereGoogle Scholar
  17. Reuss DL; Adrian RJ; Landreth CC; French DT; Fransler TD (1989a) Instantaneous planar measurements of velocity and large-scale vorticity and strain rate in an engine using particle imaging velocimetry, SAE Paper 890616Google Scholar
  18. Reuss DL;Adrian RJ;Landreth CC (1989b) Two-dimensional velocity measurements in a laminar flame using particle imaging velocimetry, Combust Sci and Tech 67, 73–83Google Scholar
  19. Reuss DL; Bradsley M; Felton PG; Landreth CC; Adrian RJ (1990) Velocity vorticity and strain-rate ahead of a flame measured in an engine using particle image velocimetry, SAE Paper 900053Google Scholar
  20. Stolz W; Köhler J; Lawrenz W; Meier F; Bloss WH; Maly RR; Herweg R; Zahn M (1992) Cycle resolved flow field measurements using PIV movie technique in a SI Engine, SAE Paper 922354Google Scholar
  21. Stolz W; Köhler J (1992) 3-D Particle Tracking Anemometry, 14th Task Leader Meeting of the International Energy Agency, Trondheim, June 1992Google Scholar
  22. Willert CE;Gharib M (1992) Three-dimensional particle imaging with a single camera, Exp Fluids 12: 353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Stolz
    • 1
  • J. Köhler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Physikalische Elektronik, Universität StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations