Advertisement

Dysphagia

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 102–109 | Cite as

Ethical dilemmas in providing nutrition

  • Michael E. Groher
Article

Abstract

The decisions involved in the institution of artificial feeding in patients with chronic and/or terminal illness are difficult. They are more complex when one is deciding if nutrition and hydration are to be withdrawn. In both instances the decision must be based on a combination of factors: the patient's right to self-determination; documented medical evidence demonstrating the need for artificial feeding, combined with a risk/benefit analysis if alternative alimentation is recommended; and an appreciation of prior legal decisions as they relate to the implementation of alternative forms of nutrients to sustain life.

Key words

Artificial feeding, ethical issues Terminal disease Nasogastric tubes Deglutition Deglutition disorders 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1983Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The American Medical Association: Statement of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Withholding or with-drawing life prolonging medical treatment. Chicago, Illinois, 1986Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    In re: Rodas, No. 86PR 139 (Colo. Dist. Ct. Mesa County Jan. 22, 1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brophy vs. New England Sinai Hospital Inc. 497 N.E. 2nd, 626 Mass., 1986Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    In re: Conroy, 98 NJ 321, 486 A 2d, 1209 (NJ, 1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    In re: Guardianship of Estelle M. Browning, Case No. 87-1176-6D, Div. 003, Fla. 1989Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    In re: Hazelton, 6 Va. Cir. Ct. Op. at 417., 1987Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Annas GJ: Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.Hastings Center Rep December 31, 1988Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Information Service Branch: The Bedside Evaluation of Dysphagia (videotape), Washington, D.C., 1989Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones B, Donner MW: How I do it: examination of the patient with dysphagia.Radiology 167:319–326, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robbins JA et al.: A modification of the modified barium-swallow.Dysphagia 2:83–86, 1987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Groher ME: Bolus management and aspiration pneumonia in patients with pseudobulbar dysphagia.Dysphagia 2:215–216, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller RM, Groher ME: General considerations in treatment, neurologic. In: Groher ME (ed):Dysphagia: Diagnosis and Management. Stoneham, MA: Butterworths, 1984Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Campbell-Taylor I, et al.: Oro-esophageal tube feeding: an alternative to nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes.Dysphagia 2:200–201, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen EN, Cohen MM: Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendationsMed Staff Counselors 2:23–35, 1988Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ciocon JO et al.: Tube feedings in elderly patients.Arch Intern Med 148:429–443, 1988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lo B, Dornbrand L: Understanding the benefits and burdens of tube feedings.Arch Intern Med 149:1925–1926, 1989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lo B, McLeod, Saika: Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment.Arch Intern Med 146:1613–1620, 1986CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miskovitz P, Weg A, Groher M: Must dysphagic patients always receive food and water?Dysphagia 2:125–126, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zerwekh J: The dehydration question.Nursing 13:47–51, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Printz LA: Is withholding hydration a valid comfort measure in the terminally ill?Geriatrics 43:84–87, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dresser RS, Boisaubin EV: Ethics, law, and nutrition support.Arch Intern Med 145:122–128, 1985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quill TE: Nasogastric feeding tubes in a group of chronically ill elderly patients in a community hospital.Arch Intern Med 149:1937–1941, 1989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spritz N: Personal communication, 1990Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    In re: Requena, 213 N.J. Super. 425, 517 A 2d 886, 1986Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ravitch WJ et al.: The swallowing center: concepts and procedures.Gastrointest Radiol 10:255–261, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bosma JF: Sensorimotor examination of the mouth and pharynx.Front Oral Physiol 2:77–107, 1976Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Groher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department 126V.A. Medical CenterTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations