Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 409–416 | Cite as

Evaluating the mechanical behavior of arterial tissue using digital image correlation

  • Dongsheng Zhang
  • Charles D. Eggleton
  • Dwayne D. Arola


In this study, digital image correlation (DIC) was adopted to examine the mechanical behavior of arterial tissue from bovine aorta. Rectangular sections comprised of the intimal and medial layers were excised from the descending aorta and loaded in displacement control uniaxial tension up to 40 percent elongation. Specimens of silicon rubber sheet were also prepared and served as a benchmark material in the application of DIC for the evaluation of large strains; the elastomer was loaded to 50 percent elongation. The arterial specimens exhibited a non-linear hyperelastic stress-strain response and the stiffness increased with percent elongation. Using a bilinear model to describe the uniaxial behavior, the average minor and major elastic modulii were 192±8 KPa and 912±40 KPa, respectively. Poisson's ratio of the arterial sections increased with the magnitude of axial strain; the average Poisson's ratio was 0.17±0.02. Although the correlation coefficient obtained from image correlation decreased with the percent elongation, a correlation coefficient greater than 0.8 was achieved for the tissue experiments and exceeded that obtained in the evaluation of the elastomer. Based on results from this study, DIC may serve as a valuable method for the determination of mechanical properties of arteries and other soft tissues.

Key Words

Artery digital image correlation (DIC) soft tissue 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Roy, C.S., “The Elastic Properties of the Artery Wall,”J. Physiol. Lond.,3,125–162 (1881).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hayashi, K., Takamizawa, K., Nakamura, T. andTsushima, N., “Effects of Elastase on the Stiffness and Elastic Properties of Arterial Walls in Cholesterol Fed Rabbit,”Atherosclerosis,66,259–267 (1987).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weizsacker, H.W., andPinto, J.G., “Isotropy and Anisotropy of the Arterial Wall,”J. Biomech.,21,477–487 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carmines, D.V., McElhaney, J.H., andStack, R., “A Piece-wise Nonlinear Elastic Expression of Human and Pig Coronary Arteries Tested in Vitro,”J Biomech.,24,899–906 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papageorgiou, G.L., andJones, N.B., “Circumferential and Longitudinal Viscoelasticity of the Human Iliac Arterial Segments in Vitro,”J. Biomed. Eng.,10,82–90 (1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gentile, B.J., Chuong, C.J., andOrdway, G.A., “Regional Volume Distensibility of Canine Thoracic Aorta During Moderate Treadmill Exercise,”Circ. Res.,63,1012–1019 (1988).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorbin, P.B., “Biaxial Anisotropy of Dog Carotid Artery: Estimation of Circumferential Elastic Modulus,”J. Biomech.,19,351–358 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gow, B.S., andHadfield, C.D., “The Elasticity of Canine and Human Coronary Arteries with Reference to Postmortem Changes,”Circ. Res.,45,588–594 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Michelini, L.C., andKrieger, E.M.Aortic Caliber Changes During Development of Hypertension in Freely Moving Rats,”Am. J. Physiol.,250,H662-H671 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayashi, K., “Experimental Approaches on Measuring the Mechanical Properties and Constitutive Laws of Arterial Walls,”ASME J. Biomech. Eng.,115,481–488 (1993).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou, J., andFung, Y.C., “The Degree of Nonlinearity and Anisotropy of Blood Vessel Elasticity,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,94,14255–14260 (1997).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Humphrey, J.D., Vawter, D.L. andVito, R.P., “Quantification of Strains in Biaxially Tested Soft Tissues,”J. Biomech.,20,59–65 (1987).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silver, F.H., Christiansen, D.L., andBuntin, C.M., “Mechanical Properties of the Aorta: A Review,”Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17,323–358 (1989).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chu, T.C., Ranson, W.F., Sutton, M.A., andPeters, W.H., “Applications of Digital-Image-Correlation Techniques to Experimental Mechanics,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,25,232–244 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutton, M.A., Chao, Y.-J., andLyons, J.S, “Computer Vision Methods for Surface Deformation Measurements in Fracture Mechanics, Novel Experimental Techniques in Fracture Mechanics,”ASME-AMD 176, 203–217 (1993).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu, H., Vendroux, G. andKnauss, W.G., “Surface Deformation Measurements of a Cylindrical Specimen by Digital Image Correlation,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,37,433–439 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao, W., andJin, G., “An Experimental Study on Measurement of Poisson's Ratio with Digital Correlation Method,”J. Appl. Polym. Sci.,60,1083–1088 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, D., Zhang, X., andCheng, G., “Compression Strain Measurement by Digital Speckle Correlation,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,39,62–65 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bastawros, A.-F., Bart-Smith, H., andEvans, A.G., “Experimental Analysis of Deformation Mechanisms in Closed Cell Aluminum Alloy Foam,”J. Mech. Phys. Solids,48,301–322 (2000).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGowan, D.M., Ambur, D.R., Hanna, T.G., andMcNeill, S.R., “Evaluating the Compressive Response of Notched Composite Panels Using Full-field Displacements,”J. Aircraft,38,122–129 (2001).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tong, W., “Detection of Plastic Deformation Patterns in a Binary Aluminum Alloy,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,37,452–459 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wattrisse, B., Chrysochoos, A., Muracciole, J.-M., andNemoz-Gaillard, M., “Analysis of Strain Localization During Tensile Tests by Digital Image Correlation,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,41,29–39 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bruck, H.A., McNeill, S.R., Sutton, M.A., andPeter, W.H.Digital Image Correlation Using Newton-Raphson Method of Partial Differential Correction,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,29,261–267 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schreier, H.W., Braasch, J.R., andSutton, M.A., “Systematic Errors in Digital Image Correlation Caused by Intensity Interpolation,”Opt. Eng.,39,2915–2921 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang, D., and Arola, D., “A New Fast-search Strategy for Digital Image Correlation,” Proc. SEM Annual Conference on Theoretical, Experimental and Computational Mechanics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June 10–12, 2001, Paper No. 80.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sutton, M.A., Chae, T.L., et al.,“Development of a Computer Vision Methodology for the Analysis of Surface Deformations in Magnified Images,” ASTM STP-1094, MICON-90, 109–132 (1990).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taber, L.A., Humphrey, J.D., “Stress Modulated Growth, Residual Stress, and Vascular Heterogeneity,”ASME J. Biomech. Eng.,123,528–535 (2001).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Greenwald, S.E., Moore, J.E., Rachev, A., Kane, T.P.C., andMeister, J.-J., “Experimental Investigation of the Distribution of Residual Strains in the Artery Wall,”ASME J. Biomech. Eng.,119,438–444 (1997).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fung Y.C., “Biomechanics. Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues,” 2nd edn, Springer, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongsheng Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Charles D. Eggleton
    • 1
  • Dwayne D. Arola
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Maryland Baltimore CountyBaltimore
  2. 2.Department of Astronautical TechnologyNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaPeople's Republic of China

Personalised recommendations