Calcified Tissue International

, 34:449

Quantitative bone histology in 84 normal American subjects

Micromorphometric analysis and evaluation of variance in iliac bone
  • Hartmut H. Malluche
  • Wolfgang Meyer
  • David Sherman
  • Shaul G. Massry
Clinical Investigations

Summary

Quantitative bone histology was done in undecalcified sections of iliac crest bone specimens obtained from 84 normal American individuals. Samples were obtained within 12 h after death in a vertical and horizontal manner from both the right and left iliac crests. In addition to the determination of normal values of micromorphometric parameters of bone in these healthy American subjects, the following studies were carried out: (a) comparison of variance of micromorphometric parameters of bone obtained from the right versus left iliac bone (40 pairs), (b) comparison of micromorphometric parameters of bone obtained in a vertical versus horizontal manner (12 pairs), (c) evaluation of variance with increasing distance from the compact zone in bone samples obtained in a vertical manner (44 pairs), (d) analysis of variation between bone samples obtained more anteriorly versus posteriorly along the iliac crest (N=40), (e) comparison of differences in micromorphometric parameters obtained from age-matched men versus premenopausal women (N=12), and (f) plotting of histograms for assessment of distribution of micromorphometric parameters. The results show that histomorphometric data of bone cannot be easily compared when different techniques are employed for obtaining bone samples. Sampling variations are kept smaller when bone specimens are obtained in a vertical manner. Anterior/posterior variation does not cause major sampling error. If ranges of variation are taken into account, quantitative bone histology is a valuable tool for assessment of bone structure and bone cells.

Key words

Bone Histomorphometry Normal values Bone biopsies Sampling error 

References

  1. 1.
    Malluche HH, Sherman D, Meyer W, Manaka R, Massry SG (1982) A new semiautomatic method for quantitative static and dynamic bone histology. Calcif Tissue Int 34:439–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manaka R, Malluche HH (1981) A program package for quantitative analysis of histologic structure and remodelling dynamics of bone. Comput Programs Biomed (in press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malluche HH, Ritz E, Hodgson M, Kutschera H, Krause G, Seiffert U, Gati A, Lange HP (1975) Skeletal lesions and calcium metabolism in early renal failure. In Moorhead, Mion, Baillod (eds): Dialysis, Transplantation, Nephrology. Pitman Medical, pp 443–450Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burck HC (1973) In: Histologische Technik. G. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 110–113Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ritz E, Malluche HH, Krempien B, Mehls O (1977) Bone histology in renal insufficiency. In David DS (ed): Calcium Metabolism in Renal Failure and Nephrolithiasis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 197–233Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dixon WJ, Brown MB (1977) Biomedical Computer Programs. P. Series, University of California Press, Los Angeles p 149Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schenk P (1973) Standard values (histomorphometry) iliac crest cancellous bone. In Jaworski ZFG (ed): Proceedings of the First Workshop on Bone Morphometry. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, pp 392–394Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulz A, Delling G (1973) Histomorphometric preparation and technique determination of trabecular bone volume. In Jaworski ZFG (ed): Proceedings of the First Workshop on Bone Morphometry. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, pp 106–108Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Courpron P, Meunier P, Bressot C, Giroux JM (1976) Amount of bone in iliac crest biopsy. Significance of the trabecular bone volume. Its values in normal and in pathological conditions. In Meunier PJ (ed): Proceedings of Second International Workshop. Lyon, France, pp 39–53Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bordier PJ, Tun CS (1972) Quantitative histology of metabolic bone disease. Clin Endocrinol Metab 1:197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melsen F, Melsen B, Mosekilde L, Bergman S (1978) Histomorphometric analysis of normal bone from the iliac crest. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 86:70–81Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hruska KA, Teitelbaum SL, Kopelman R, Richardson CA, Miller P, Debman J, Martin K, Slatolsky E (1978) The predictability of the histological features of uremic bone disease by non-invasive techniques. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 1:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sherrard DJ, Baylink DJ, Wergedal JE, Maloney NA (1974) Quantitative histological studies on the pathogenesis of uremic bone disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 39:119–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Whitehouse WJ (1977) Cancellous bone in the anterior part of the iliac crest. Calcif Tissue Res 23:67–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xipell JM, Brown DJ (1979) Histology of normal bone—a computerized study in the iliac crest. Pathology 11:235–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melsen F, Melsen B, Mosekilde L (1978) An evaluation of the quantitative parameters applied in bone histology. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 86:63–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hartmut H. Malluche
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Meyer
    • 1
  • David Sherman
    • 1
  • Shaul G. Massry
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Nephrology and Department of MedicineUniversity of Southern California School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Division of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism and Department of MedicineUniversity of Kentucky, College of MedicineLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations