Advertisement

Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 433–438 | Cite as

Techniques for determining the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis

  • S. H. Cohn
Editorial

Summary

Each of the presently available noninvasive methods used to determine the nature and degree of changes in skeletal mass has significant advantages and limitations. Dual photon absorptiometric techniques generally have a very low radiation dose. They are also less expensive to construct than other systems. However, they provide information only on a highly localized portion of the axial skeleton. Computed tomography offers significant potential advantages over other techniques, but requires further work for the solution of inherent technical problems. Similarly, considerable additional work is required for the Compton scattering technique; the technical problems associated with this are even more formidable. Neutron activation analysis permits the direct in vivo measurement of total calcium content of the body and hence, skeletal mass. However, while there is vast clinical and research experience with partial body and total body neutron activation, the techniques are generally not routinely available for application in clinical centers. The question as to whether DPA of the spine, or total body calcium measurement best reflects changes in bone mass after therapy has not been resolved.

Key words

Neutron activation analysis Dual photon absorptiometry Computed tomography Compton scattering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of drugs used in the treatment of osteoporosis (1979) HEW(FDA) 80-3094Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohn SH (ed) (1981) Non-invasive measurements of bone mass and their clinical application. CRC Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohn SH (1980) The present state of in vivo neutron activation analysis in clinical diagnosis and therapy. Atom Energy Rev 18:599–660Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peppler WW, Mazess RB (1981) Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. I. Theory and measurement procedure. Calcif Tissue Int 33:353–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazess RB, Peppler WW, Chesnut CH III, Nelp WB, Cohn SH, Zanzi I (1981) Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. II. Comparison with total body calcium by neutron activation analysis. Calcif Tissue Int 33:361–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton LJk III (1981) Differential changes in bone mineral density of appendicular and axial skeleton with aging. Relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 67:328–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manzke E, Chesnut CH III, Wergedal JE, Baylink DJ, Nelp WB (1975) Relationship between local and total bone mass in osteoporosis. Metabolism 24:605–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohn SH, Ellis KJ, Wallach S, Zanzi I, Atkins HL, Aloia JF (1974) Absolute and relative deficit in total-body calcium and radial bone mineral content in osteoporosis. J Nucl Med 15:428–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith MA, Elton RA, Tothill P (1981) The comparison of neutron activation and photon absorptiometry at the same part-body site. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 2:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohn SH (1981) In vivo neutron activation analysis: state of the art and future prospects. Med Phys 8:145–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohn SH, Vaswani A, Zanzi I, Aloia JF, Roginsky MS, Ellis KJ (1976) Changes in body chemical composition with age measured by total body neutron activation. Metabolism 25:85–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohn SH, Vaswani A, Zanzi I, Ellis KJ (1976) Effect of aging on bone mass in adult women. Am J Physiol 230:143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nuclear based techniques for in vivo study of human body composition (1981) Report of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Advisory Group (In press)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rockoff SD, Sweet E, Bleustein J (1969) The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Calcif Tissue Res 3:163–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mazess RB (1981) Total body and regional bone mineral by dual-photon absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 33:328 (abstr)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christiansen C, Rödbro P (1977) Long-term reproducibility of bone mineral content measurements. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 37:321–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parfitt AM (1980) Morphologic basis of bone mineral measurements: transient and steady state effects of treatment in osteoporosis. Mineral Electrolyte Metab 4:273–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. H. Cohn
    • 1
  1. 1.Brookhaven National LaboratoryMedical Research CenterUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations