Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 332–336 | Cite as

Relationship between porosity and mineralization in the haversian osteon

  • J. Black
  • R. U. Mattson
Clinical Investigations

Summary

Cortical bone, at the osteonal level, consists of three phases: mineral, organic, and pore or void phases. In osteonal segments excised from mature human cortical bone, organic volume percent is a constant. Determination of the mineral and organic phase densities present in these segments has led to defining a simple relationship between percent mineralization and void volume. Studies of a group of osteonal segments from 5 human tibias suggest that porosity of up to 22.7% may exist. This is much more than is suggested by histological examination, leading to the conclusion that the majority of the void phase is present as a dispersed porosity.

Key words

Osteon Bone mineral Porosity Bone density Phase structure of bone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown, W. E.: Crystal growth of bone mineral, Clin. Orthor. Rel. Res.,44, 205–220, 1966Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eastoe, J. E., Eastoe, B.: The organic constituents of mammalian compact bone, Biochem. J.57:453–59, 1954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strandh, J.: Microchemical studies on single haversian systems. I. Methodological considerations with special reference to variations in mineral content, Exp. Cell Res.19:515–520, 1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies, H. G., Engstrom, A.: Interferometric and X-ray absorption studies of bone tissue, Exp. Cell Res.7:243–55, 1954CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Black, J.: Dead or alive: the problem of in vitro tissue mechanics, J. Biomed. Mater. Res.10:377–390, 1976CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Black, J., Mattson, R. U.: The relationship between porosity and mineralization in the haversian osteon segment, Trans. ORS5:229, 1980Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Woessner, J. F. J.: Determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing a small proportion of this amino acid, Arch. Biochem. Biophys.93:440–447, 1961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neuman, R. E., Logan, M. A.: The determination of collagen and elastin in tissues, J. Biol. Chem.186:549–556, 1950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyde, A.: Scanning electron microscope studies of bone. In: G. H. Bourne (ed.): The Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone, Vol. 1, pp. 259–310. Academic Press, New York, 1972Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Currey, J. D.: Mechanical consequences of variation in mineral content of bone, J. Biomechan.2:1–11, 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vose, G. P., Kubala, A. L.: Bone strength—its relationship to X-ray determined ash content, Hum. Biol.31:262–270, 1959Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mattson, R. U., Black, J., Richardson, S. R., Pollack, S. R.: Dynamic compressive modulus of human haversian osteons, Trans. ORS5:56, 1980Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kornblum, S. S., Kelly, P. J.: The lacunae and haversian canals in tibial bone from ischemic and non-ischemic limbs, J. Bone Joint Surg.46A:797–810, 1964Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amprino, R., Engstrom, A.: Studies on X-ray absorption and diffraction of bone tissue, Acta Anat. (Basel)15:1–22, 1952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson, R. A.: Chemical analysis and electron microscopy of bone. In Rodahl, K., Nicholson, J. T., Brown, E. M., Jr. (eds): Bone As a Tissue, pp. 186–250. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Black
    • 1
  • R. U. Mattson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations