Hollow fibres for pressure membrane separation of liquids
- 51 Downloads
Abstract
The maximum specific separating surface area and absence of the necessity of using special drainage installations are the basic advantages of separating apparatuses with membranes in the form of hollow fibres. The separating apparatuses for reverse osmosis are apparatuses of the support type. The basic area of their application is demineralization (total or partial) of natural ground waters and waters from open bodies for water for municipal and industrial purposes. Ultrafiltration separating apparatuses are of the nonsupport type. The basic application of these apparatuses is concentration and purification of solutions of high-molecular-weight compounds in the pharmaceutical microbiological, food, and other industries.
Keywords
Polymer Purification Organic Chemistry Ground Water Basic AreaPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.G. V. Terpugov, Candidate Dissertation, Moscow Institute of Chemical Engineering, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
- 2.G. A. Budnitskii and L. P. Perepechkin, Khim. Volokna, No. 2, 3 (1996).Google Scholar
- 3.B. D. Rysyuk, Khim. Volokna, No. 2, 46 (1990).Google Scholar
- 4.A. Kogrin and P. M. Korinek, in: Proceedings of the DuPont de Nemours Seminar on Reverse Osmosis Using Permasep Installations [in Russian], Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
- 5.Hollosep for Seawater Desalination, Toyobo Technical Bulletin, Osaka (1984).Google Scholar
- 6.V. A. Bakunov et al., in: Proceedings of the II All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Vladimir (1977), p. 225.Google Scholar
- 7.Yu. A. Kostrov and L. P. Perepechkin, in: Fibres with Special Properties [in Russian], L. A. Vol'f (ed.), Khimiya, Moscow (1980), p. 230.Google Scholar
- 8.U. Merten, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund.,2, No. 1, 229–236 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.T. K. Sherwood et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund.,4, No. 1, 113–119 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.L. P. T. Briant, in: Desalination by Reverse Osmosis, U. Merten (ed.), M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1966), pp. 166–202.Google Scholar
- 11.E. A. Dmitriev, Candidate Dissertation, Moscow Institute of Chemical Technology, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
- 12.Yu. I. Dytnerskii, Reverse Osmosis and Ultrafiltration [in Russian], Khimiya, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
- 13.Permaser-Permeators General Guide to Product and Properties, DuPont Technical Bulletin (1984).Google Scholar
- 14.U. S. Patent No. 3,660,281 (1972).Google Scholar
- 15.E. Hochscherf and G. Mandre, Chem. Ind. Techn.,44, No. 20, 1132 (1972).Google Scholar
- 16.W. W. Ranson, Presented at the International Desalination Conference, Ponce, Puerto Rico (1975), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
- 17.Hollow Fibre Configuration RO Module Hollosep, Toyobo Technical Bulletin, Osaka (1985).Google Scholar
- 18.Nitto Product Information, Ref. No. 02/07'87 A, Nitto Technical Bulletin (1987).Google Scholar
- 19.P. Grammon, Report at Rohm & Haas Symposium, Moscow (1986).Google Scholar
- 20.Product Information and Operating Instructions — Diaflo Hollow Fibre Cartridges, Publication No. 1 (1984), Amicon Technical Bulletin (1984).Google Scholar
- 21.O. Bauer and K. Marquart, Pharm. Ind.,43, No. 1, 94–100 (1981).Google Scholar
- 22.N. F. Reznik, T. M. Baigulova, et al., in: Proceedings of the III All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Part II, Vladimir (1981), p. 258.Google Scholar
- 23.F. N. Karelin, in: Proceedings fov the IV All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Vol. 4, Moscow (1987), p. 1.Google Scholar
- 24.A. S. Kharask, in: Proceedings of the V All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Vladimir-Cherkassy (1991), p. 78.Google Scholar
- 25.Hager + Elzesser GmbH Technical Bulletin, No. 4135 (1981).Google Scholar
- 26.Hager + Elzesser GmbH Technical Bulletin, No. 4140 (1981).Google Scholar
- 27.L. P. Perepechkin, L. N. Nechaeva, et al., in: Proceedings of the V All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Vladimir-Cherkassy (1991), p. 81.Google Scholar
- 28.E. M. Aizenshtein and L. N. Nechaeva, in: Proceedings of the Russian Conference on Membranes and Membrane Technologies “Membranes-95,” [in Russian], Moscow (1995), p. 198.Google Scholar
- 29.S. V. Petrov, in: Proceedings of the IV All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Vol. 5, Moscow (1987), p. 53.Google Scholar
- 30.A. E. Polotskii, S. V. Tsareva, et al., Proceedings of the IV All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Vol. 5, Moscow (1987), p. 19.Google Scholar
- 31.V. B. Zen'kevich, S. V. Petrov, et al., Proceedings of the IV All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Vol. 5, Moscow (1987), p. 54.Google Scholar
- 32.V. M. Girshgorn, V. I. Volkova, et al., in: Proceedings of the III All-Union Conference on Membrane Methods of Separation of Mixtures [in Russian], Part II, Vladimir (1981), p. 195.Google Scholar
- 33.E. Forentino, Report to the Rohm & Haas Symposium, Moscow (1986).Google Scholar
- 34.K. A. Volchek, Candidate Dissertation, Moscow Institute of Chemical Engineering, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
- 35.D. Ya. Matskyavichene, Candidate Dissertation, Scientific and Industrial Association, Mytishchi.Google Scholar