Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 221–232 | Cite as

Reconstructing evolution from eukaryotic small-ribosomal-subunit RNA sequences: Calibration of the molecular clock

  • Yves Van de Peer
  • Jean-Marc Neefs
  • Peter De Rijk
  • Rupert De Wachter
Article

Abstract

The detailed descriptions now available for the secondary structure of small-ribosomalsubunit RNA, including areas of higly variable primary structure, facilitate the alignment of nucleotide sequences. However, for optimal exploitation of the information contained in the alignment, a method must be available that takes into account the local sequence variability in the computation of evolutionary distance. A quantitative definition for the variability of an alignment position is proposed in this study. It is a parameter in an equation which expresses the probability that the alignment position contains a different nucleotide in two sequences, as a function of the distance separating these sequences, i.e., the number of substitutions per nucleotide that occurred during their divergence. This parameter can be estimated from the distance matrix resulting from the conversion of pairwise sequence dissimilarities into pairwise distances. Alignment positions can then be subdivided into a number of sets of matching variability, and the average variability of each set can be derived. Next, the conversion of dissimilarity into distance can be recalculated for each set of alignment positions separately, using a modified version of the equation that corrects for multiple substitutions and changing for each set the parameter that reflects its average variability. The distances computed for each set are finally averaged, giving a more precise distance estimation.

Trees constructed by the algorithm based on variability calibration have a topology markedly different from that of trees constructed from the same alignments in the absence of calibration. This is illustrated by means of trees constructed from small-ribosomal-subunit RNA sequences of Metazoa. A reconstruction of vertebrate evolution based on calibrated alignments matches the consensus view of paleontologists, contrary to trees based on uncalibrated alignments. In trees derived from sequences covering several metazoan phyla, artefacts in topology that are probably due to a high clock rate in certain lineages are avoided.

Key words

Small-ribosomal-subunit RNA Sequence variability Substitution rate Evolutionary distance Vertebrate phylogeny Metazoanphylogeny 

Abbreviations

SSU rRNA

small ribosomal subunit RNA

LSU rRNA

large ribosomal subunit RNA

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carmenes RS (1991) LSTSQ: a module for reliable constrained and unconstrained nonlinear regression. Comput Applic Biosci 7:373–378Google Scholar
  2. De Rijk P, Neefs J-M, Van de Peer Y, De Wachter P (1992) Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 20:2075–2089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA, Gauthier J, Kluge AG, Rowe T (1989) The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:431–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Golding GB (1983) Estimates of DNA and protein sequence divergence: an examination of some assumptions. Mol Biol Evol 1:125–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gutell RR, Schnare MN, Gray MW (1992) A compilation of large subunit (23S- and 23S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res 20:2095–2109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hedges SB, Moberg KD, Maxson LR (1990) Tetrapod phylogeny inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA sequences and a review of the evidence for amniote relationships. Mol Biol Evol 7:607–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hedges SB, Maxson LR (1991) Pancreatic polypeptide and the sister group of birds. Mol Biol Evol 8:888–891PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hendriks L, Van de Peer Y, Van Herck M, Neefs JM, De Wachter R (1990) The 18S ribosomal RNA sequence of the sea anemoneAnemonia sulcata and its evolutionary position among other eukaryotes. FEBS Lett 269:445–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hendriks L, De Baere R, Van de Peer Y, Neefs JM, Goris A, De Wachter R (1991) The evolutionary position of the rhodophytePorphyra umbilicalis and the basidiomyceteLeucosporidium scottii among other eukaryotes as deduced from complete sequences of small ribosomal subunit RNA. J Mol Evol 32:167–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–123Google Scholar
  11. Manske CL, Chapman DJ (1987) Nonuniformity of nucleotide substitution rates in molecular evolution: computer simulation and analysis of 5S ribosomal RNA sequences. J Mol Evol 26:226–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Marshall CR (1992) Substitution bias, weighted parsimony, and amniote phylogeny as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 9:370–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Neefs J-M, De Wachter R (1990) A proposal for the secondary structure of a variable area of eukaryotic small ribosomal subunit RNA involving the existence of a pseudoknot. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5695–5704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Olsen GJ (1987) Earliest phylogenetic branchings: comparing rRNA-based evolutionary trees inferred with various techniques. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol LII:825–837Google Scholar
  15. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Saitou N, Imanishi T (1989) Relative efficiencies of the Fitch-Margoliash, maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood, minimum-evolution, and neighbour-joining methods of phylogenetic tree construction in obtaining the correct tree. Mol Biol Evol 6:514–525Google Scholar
  17. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  18. Sogin ML, Edman U, Elwood H (1989) A single kingdom of eukaryotes. In: Fernholm B, Bremer K, Jörnvall H (eds) The hierarchy of life. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 133–143Google Scholar
  19. Sourdis J, Nei M (1988) Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree. Mol Biol Evol 5:298–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Van de Peer Y, De Wachter R (1992) TREECON: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees. Comput Applic Biosci 9:177–182Google Scholar
  21. Van de Peer Y, Neefs JM, De Rijk P, De Wachter R (1993) Evolution of eukaryotes as deduced from small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Biochem Syst Ecol 21:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams PL, Fitch WM (1990) Phylogeny determination using dynamically weighted parsimony method. Methods Enzymol 183:615–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Woese CR (1987) Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev 51:221–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Woese CR (1991) The use of ribosomal RNA in reconstructing evolutionary relationships among bacteria. In: Selander RK, Clark AG, Whittam TS (eds) Evolution at the molecular level. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  25. Wolters J (1991) The troublesome parasites—molecular and morphological evidence that Apicomplexa belong to the dinoflagellate-ciliate clade. BioSystems 25:75–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yves Van de Peer
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Neefs
    • 1
  • Peter De Rijk
    • 1
  • Rupert De Wachter
    • 1
  1. 1.Departement BiochemieUniversiteit Antwerpen (UIA)AntwerpenBelgium

Personalised recommendations