Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 117–122 | Cite as

The distribution of genes on chromosomes: A cytological approach

  • A. T. Sumner
  • Joaquina de la Torre
  • L. Stuppia
Article

Abstract

Studies during the last 20 years have shown that the chromosomes of many organisms, especially those of higher vertebrates, consist of a series of segments having different properties. These can be recognized as, for example, G- and R-bands. Recent studies have indicated that genes tend to lie in the R-bands rather than in the G-bands, although the number of genes that has been mapped with high precision is, as yet, only a very small proportion of the total, probably much less than 1%. We have therefore sought to study the distribution of genes on chromosomes using a cytological approach in conjunction with “universal” markers for genes. Such markers include mRNA and the gene-rich, G + C-rich H3 fraction of DNA, both of which can be localized using in situ hybridization, and DNase I hypersensitivity, and digestion by restriction enzymes known to show selectivity for the CpG islands associated with active genes, both of which can be detected using in situ nick translation. We have chosen to use the approaches involving in situ nick translation and have shown that the patterns of DNase I hypersensitivity and of CpG islands on human chromosomes show a strict correspondence to R-banding patterns: Deviations from R-banding patterns reported by previous investigators who have made similar studies appear to be attributable to excessive digestion. On the other hand, we have not found the expected differentiation between the active and inactive X chromosomes; this may perhaps be attributable to such factors as the demethylation of some non-island CpGs in the inactive X and the possible alterations of chromatin structure caused by methanol-acetic-acid fixation affecting DNase I hypersensitivity.

Key words

Chromosomes Human chromosomes Gene distribution DNase I hypersensitivity CpG islands In situ nick translation Inactive X chromosome 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adolph S, Hameister H (1985)In situ nick translation of metaphase chromosomes with biotin-labelled d-UTP. Human Genet 69:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adolph S, Hameister H (1990)In situ nick translation of human metaphase chromosomes with the restriction enzymes Msp I and Hpa II reveals an R-band pattern. Cytogenet Cell Genet 54:132–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aissani B, Bernardi G (1991) CpG islands, genes and isochores in the genomes of vertebrates. Gene 106:185–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Antequera F, Bird AP (1988) Unmethylated CpG islands associated with genes in higher plant DNA. EMBO J 7:2295–2299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardi G (1989) The isochore organization of the human genome. Annu Rev Genet 23:637–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernardi G, Olofsson B, Filipski J, Zerial M, Salinas J, Cuny G, Meunier-Rotival M, Rodier F (1985) The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science 228:953–958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickmore WA, Sumner AT (1989) Mammalian chromosome banding—an expression of genome organization. Trends Genet 5:144–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird AP (1986) CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature 321:209–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird AP (1987) CpG islands as gene markers in the vertebrate nucleus. Trends Genet 3:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird AP (1989) Two classes of observed frequency for rare-cutter sites in CpG islands. Nucleic Acids Res 17:9485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bird AP (1992) The essentials of DNA methylation. Cell 70:5–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd Y, Fraser NJ (1990) Methylation patterns at the hypervariable X-chromosome locus DXS255 (M27β): correlation with X-inactivation status. Genomics 7:182–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown WRA, Bird AP (1986) Long-range restriction site mapping of mammalian genomic DNA. Nature 322:477–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bullerdiek J, Dittmer J, Faehre A, Bartnitzke S (1986) An improved method forin situ nick translation of human chromosomes with biotin 11-labeled dUTP detected by biotinylated alkaline phosphatase. Cytobios 45:35–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandley AC, McBeath S (1987) DNase I hypersensitive sites along the XY bivalent at meiosis in man include the XpYp pairing region. Cytogenet Cell Genet 44:22–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper DN, Taggart MH, Bird AP (1983) Unmethylated domains in vertebrate DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 11:647–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cross S, Kovarik P, Schmidtke J, Bird A (1991) Non-methylated islands in fish genomes are GC-poor. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1469–1474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. de la Torre J, Mitchell AR, Sumner AT (1991) Restriction endonuclease/nick translation of fixed mouse chromosomes: a study of factors affecting digestion of chromosomal DNA in situ. Chromosoma 100:203–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. de la Torre J, Sumner AT, Gosalvez J, Stuppia L (1992) The distribution of genes on human chromosomes as studied by in situ nick translation. Genome 35:890–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyer KA, Riley D, Gartler SM (1985) Analysis of inactive X chromosome structure by in situ nick translation. Chromosoma 92:209–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Elgin SCR (1988) The formation and function of DNase I hypersensitive sites in the process of gene activation. J Biol Chem 263:19259–19262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardiner K (1990) Pulsed field gel electrophoresis and investigations into mammalian genome organization. J Cell Sci 96:5–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M (1992) Significant CpG-rich regions in angiosperm genes. J Mol Evol 34:231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gazit B, Cedar H, Lerer I, Voss R (1982) Active genes are sensitive to deoxyribonuclease I during metaphase. Science 217:648–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gross DS, Garrard WT (1988) Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem 57:159–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmquist GP (1992) Chromosome bands, their chromatin flavours, and their functional features. Am J Hum Genet 51:17–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hultén M (1974) Chiasma distribution at diakinesis in the normal human male. Hereditas 76:55–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kerem B, Goitein R, Richler C, Marcus M, Cedar H (1983) In situ nick translation distinguishes between active and inactive X chromosomes. Nature 304:88–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kerem B-S, Goitein R, Diamond G, Cedar H, Marcus M (1984) Mapping of DNAse I sensitive regions on mitotic chromosomes. Cell 38:493–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Larsen F, Gundersen G, Lopez R, Prydz H (1992) CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics 13:1095–1107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindsay S, Bird AP (1987) Use of restriction enzymes to detect potential gene sequences in mammalian DNA. Nature 327:336–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindsay S, Monk M, Holliday R, Hutschtscha L, Davies KE, Riggs AD, Flavell RA (1985) Differences in methylation on the active and inactive human X chromosomes. Ann Hum Genet 49:115–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Migeon BR (1990) Insights into X chromosome inactivation from studies of species variation, DNA methylation and replication, and vice versa. Genet Res Camb 56:91–98Google Scholar
  34. Mouchiroud D, d'Onofrio G, Aissani B, Macaya G, Gautier C, Bernardi G (1991) The distribution of genes in the human genome. Gene 100:181–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Murer-Orlando ML, Peterson AC (1985)In situ nick translation of human and mouse chromosomes detected with a biotinylated nucleotide. Exp Cell Res 157:322–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Prantera G, Ferraro M (1990) Analysis of methylation and distribution of CpG sequences on human active and inactive X chromosomes by in situ nick translation. Chromosoma 99:18–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Richler C, Uliel E, Kerem B-S, Wahrman J (1987) Regions of active chromatin conformation in ‘inactive’ male meiotic sex chromosomes of the mouse. Chromosoma 95:167–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Riggs AD, Pfeiffer GP (1992) X-chromosome inactivation and cell memory. Trends Genet 8:169–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodionov AV (1985) The genetic activity of G- and R-band DNA in human mitotic chromosomes (in Russian). Genetika 21:2057–2065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Saccone S, de Sario A, della Valle G, Bernardi G (1992) The highest gene concentrations in the human genome are in telomeric bands of metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:4913–4917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sperling K, Kerem BS, Goitein R, Kottusch V, Cedar H, Marcus M (1985) DNAse I sensitivity in facultative and constitutive heterochromatin. Chromosoma 93:38–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sumner AT (1990) Chromosome banding. London: Unwin HymanGoogle Scholar
  43. Sumner AT, Taggart MH, Mezzanotte R, Ferrucci L (1990) Patterns of digestion of human chromosomes by restriction endonucleases demonstrated by in situ nick translation. Histochem J 22:639–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Viegas-Péquignot E, Dutrillaux B, Thomas G (1988) Inactive X chromosome has the highest concentration of unmethylated Hha I sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7657–7660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Weintraub H, Groudine M (1976) Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 193:848–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolf SF, Migeon BR (1985) Clusters of CpG dinucleotides implicated by nuclease hypersensitivity as control elements of housekeeping genes. Nature 314:467–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yunis JJ, Tsai MY (1978) Mapping of polysomal messenger RNA and heterogenous nuclear RNA to the lightly staining G-bands of human chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 22:364–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Yunis JJ, Kuo MT, Saunders GF (1977) Localization of sequences specifying messenger RNA to light-staining G-bands of human chromosomes. Chromosoma 61:335–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. T. Sumner
    • 1
  • Joaquina de la Torre
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. Stuppia
    • 3
  1. 1.MRC Human Genetics UnitWestern General HospitalEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Unidad Genetica, Departamento de BiologiaUniversidad Autonoma de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Istituto di Citomorfologia Normale e Patologica del CNRChietiItaly

Personalised recommendations