Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 36, Supplement 1, pp S37–S45 | Cite as

The cellular basis of bone remodeling: The quantum concept reexamined in light of recent advances in the cell biology of bone

  • A. M. Parfitt


The cellular basis of the normal bone remodeling sequence in the human adult is discussed in relation to a cycle of five stages—quiescence, activation, resorption, reversal, formation, and return to quiescence. Normally, 80% or more of free bone surfaces are quiescent with respect to remodeling. The structure of the quiescent surface comprises 5 layers; listed in order out toward the bone marrow these are: the lamina limitans (the electron dense outer edge of the mineralized bone matrix), unmineralized connective tissue that may be confused with osteoid by light microscopy, flattened lining cells of osteoblast lineage separated by narrow gaps, more unmineralized connective tissue, and finally either the squamous sac cells of red marrow or the cytoplasm of fat cells of yellow marrow. Activation requires the recruitment of new osteoclasts derived from precursor cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system (and so ultimately from the hematopoietic stem cell), a method for precursor cells to penetrate the cellular and connective tissue barrier of the quiescent surface, and so gain access to the bone mineral, and mechanisms for their attraction and binding to the mineralized surface, possibly in response to chemotactic signals released from bone matrix or mineral. Each of these three steps is probably mediated in some way by lining cells. Resorption is carried out by osteoclasts, most of which are multinucleated. The mean life span of individual nuclei is about 12.5 days; the additional nuclei needed to sustain resorption may be derived fromlocal as well as blood-bone precursors, but nothing is known of their fate. Mononuclear cells may participate not only as precursor cells but as additional resorbing cells, helper cells, and releasers of osteoclast-stimulating agents such as prostaglandins or OAF. It is not known how the size, shape and depth of resorption cavities are controlled, but termination of resorption may involve the release of a suppressor agent (such as prostacyclin) by osteocytes and/or lining cells. During the reversal period the resorption cavity is smoothed off and cement substance is deposited, but the responsible cells are unknown. Successful coupling of formation to resorption requires the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast precursor cells, focal accumulation of the new osteoblasts within the resorption cavity, and their alignment as a continuous monolayer of uniform polarity. These processes are probably mediated by growth factors released during resorption, and by chemotactic agents present in the bone matrix or in the cement substance. Formation of new bone within the resorption cavity begins with rapid matrix apposition followed some days later by the onset of mineralization. Although the average rates of these two processes during the life span of the osteoid seam (the layer of unmineralized bone matrix) are the same, their instantaneous rates are systematically out of step, so that the osteoid seam width increases rapidly to a maximum of about 20 µm and then declines progressively. At each point on the surface a single osteoblast makes all the bone matrix that is formed, and how completely the cavities are refilled probably depends more on the number of osteoblasts initially assembled than on their individual activity. At the termination of matrix synthesis, mineralization continues more slowly until the osteoid seam eventually disappears and the cells remaining on the surface complete their morphologic and functional transformation to lining cells. The surface has now returned to its original state of quiescence except that the bone is younger. How the remodeling sequence just described is modified to accomplish structural change in response to altered mechanical load is unclear; in particular, it is not known whether there can be direct transformation of a quiescent to a forming surface without intervening resorption.

Key words

Bone lining cells Osteoclasts Osteoblasts Remodeling activation Chemotactic cell migration Coupling factors 


  1. 1.
    Frost HM (1973) Bone remodelling and its relationship to metabolic bone disease. CC Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parfitt AM (1979) The quantum concept of bone remodelling and turnover. Implications for the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 28:1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin RB, Burr DB (1982) A hypothetical mechanism for the stimulation of osteonal remodelling by fatigue damage. J Biomech 15:137–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parfitt AM (1981) Integration of skeletal and mineral homeostasis. In: DeLuca HF, Frost H, Jee W, Johnston C, Parfitt AM (eds) Osteoporosis: recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. University Park Press, Baltimore, p 115Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frost HM (1982) Review Article: Mechanical determinants of bone modeling. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 4:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parfitt AM (1983) The physiologic and clinical significance of bone histomorphometric data. In: Recker R (ed) Bone histomorphometry. Techniques and interpretations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 143Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parfitt AM (1982) The coupling of bone resorption to bone formation: a critical analysis of the concept and of its relevance to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 4:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frost HM. The skeletal intermediary organisation: a review. Metab Bone Dis Rel ResGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peck WA, Shen V, Rifas L. Locally elaborated factors in the coordination of bone cell activity. In: Frame B, Potts J Jr (eds) Clinical disorders of bone and mineral metabolism. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mathews JL (1980) Bone structure and ultrastructure. In: Urist MR (ed) Fundamental and clinical bone physiology. JB Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scherft JP (1972) The lamina limitans of the organic matrix of calcified cartilage and bone. J Ultrastruct Res 38:318–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller SC, Bowman BM, Smith JA, Jee WSS (1980) Characterization of endosteal bone-lining cells from fatty marrow bone sites in adult beagles. Anat Rec 198:163–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanderwiel CJ (1980) An ultrastructural study of the components which make up the resting surface of bone. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry. 3rd International Workshop, Armour Montagu, Paris, p 109Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jee WSS, Kimmel DB (1977) Bone cell origin at the endosteal surface. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Bone histomorphometry: 2nd International Workshop. Armour Montagu, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parfitt AM (1979) Equilibrium and disequilibrium hypercalcemia: new light on an old concept. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 1:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chambers TJ (1980) The cellular basis of bone resorption. Clin Orthop Rel Res 151:283–293Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Triffitt JT, Owen M (1977) Preliminary studies in the binding of plasma albumin to bone tissue. Calcif Tissue Res 23:303–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Triffitt JT, Owen ME, Ashton BA, Wilson JM (1978) Plasma disappearance of rabbit α2-HS glycoprotein and its uptake by bone tissue. Calif Tissue Res 26:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Raina V (1972) Normal osteoid tissue. J Clin Path 25:229–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miller SC, Jee WSS (1980) The microvascular bed of fatty bone marrow in the adult beagle. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 2:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Menton DN, Simmons DJ, Orr BY, Plurad SB (1982) A cellular investment of bone marrow. Anat Rec 203:157–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murch AR, Grounds MD, Marshall CA, Papadimitriou JM (1982) Direct evidence that inflammatory multinucleate giant cells form by fusion. J Pathol 137:177–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Owen M (1980) The origin of bone cells in the postnatal organism. Arthritis Rheum 23:1073–1079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vaugan J (1981) The physiology of bone. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loutit JF, Nisbet NW (1982) The origin of osteoclasts. Immunobiol 161:193–203Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Teitelbaum SL, Kahn AJ (1980) Mononuclear phagocytes, osteoclasts and bone resorption. Mineral Electrolyte Metab 3:2–9Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bonucci E (1981) New knowledge on the origin, function and fate of osteoclasts. Clin Orthop 158:252–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ries WL, Gong JK (1982) A comparative study of osteoclasts: in situ versus smear specimens. Anat Rec 203:221–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chambers TJ (1979) Phagocytosis and trypsin-resistant glass adhesion by osteoclasts in culture. J Pathol 127:55–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jones SJ, Hogg NM, Shapiro IM, Slusarenko, Boyde A (1981) Cells with Fc receptors in the cell layer next to osteoblasts and osteoclasts on bone. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 2:357–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wronski TJ, Smith JM, Jee WSS (1980) The microdistribution and retention of239Pu on the trabelcular bone surfaces of the beagle: implications for the induction of osteosarcoma. Radiol Res 83:74–89Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rodan GA, Martin TJ (1981) Role of osteoblasts in hormonal control of bone resorption—a hypothesis. Calcif Tissue Int 33:349–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Malone JD, Teitelbaum SL, Griffin GL, Senior RM, Kahn AJ (1982) Recruitment of osteoclast precursors by purified bone matrix constituents. J Cell Biol 92:227–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chambers TJ (1981) Phagocytic recognition of bone by macrophages. Pathology 135:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mundy GR, Yoneda T (1981) Monocytes: interactions with bone cells and lymphocytes during bone resorption. In: Cohn DV, Talmage RV, Matthews JL (eds) Hormonal control of calcium metabolism. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 178Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fallon MD (in press) Osteoblasts mediate osteoclastic bone resorption in cell culture. Abstracts of 5th Annual Meeting of American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, Calcif Tissue Int (Suppl)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wong GL, Kocour BA (in press) OB cells are required for OC cell response to parathyroid hormone. Abstracts of 5th Annual Meeting of American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, Calcif Tissue Int (Suppl)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holtrop ME, Raisz LG, Simmons HA (1974) The effects of parathyroid hormone, colchicine, and calcitonin on ultrastructure and the activity of osteoclasts in organ culture. J Cell Biol 60:346–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bar-Shavit Z, Kahn AJ, Teitelbaum SL (1982) Defective oligosaccharide-mediated cell-bone attachment in osteomalacia. Abstracts of 4th Annual Meeting American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Calif Tissue Int 34(Suppl 1):S2Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Takagi M, Parmley RT, Toda Y, Denys FR (1982) Extracellular and intracellular digestion of complex carbohydrates by osteoclasts. Lab Invest 46:288–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Malone JD, Kahn AJ, Teitelbaum SL (1982) Dissociation of organic acid secretion from macrophage-mediated bone resorption. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 108:468–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Heersche JNM (1978) Mechanism of osteoclastic bone resorption: a new hyothesis. Calcif Tissue Res 26:81–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Woods CG (1980) The relationship of osteoclasts to collagen fibre orientation. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry: 3rd Int Workshop. Armour Montagu, ParisGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jaworski ZFG (1976) Parameters and indices of bone resorption. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Bone histomorphometry, 2nd Int Workshop. Armour Montague, ParisGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eriksen EF, Melsen F, Mosekilde L (1983) Reconstruction of the resorptive site in iliac trabecular bone: a kinetic model for bone resorption in 20 normal individuals. Abstracts of the 17th European Symposium on Calcified Tissues. Calcif Tissue Int 35(Suppl):A8Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jaworski ZFG, Duck B, Sekaly G (1981) Kinetics of osteoclasts and their nuclei in evolving secondary haversian systems. J Anat 133:397–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jaworski ZFG, Kimmel DB, Jee WSS (1983) Cell kinetics underlying skeletal growth and bone tissue turnover. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 225Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Loutit JF, Townsend KMS (1982) Longevity of osteoclasts in radiation chimaeras of beige and osteopetrotic microphthalmic mice. Br J Exp Pathol 63:214–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chambers TJ, Bristow K, Athanasou NA (in press) The effect of calcitonin prostaglandins and parathyroid hormone on the cytoplasmic spreading of osteoclasts. In: Abstracts of 5th Annual Meeting of The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Calcif Tissue Int (Suppl)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Braidman IP, Anderson DC, Weiss JB (1982) Evidence for a local interaction between osteoclasts and osteoblasts in culture. Abstracts of the 4th Annual Meeting of The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Calcif Tissue Int 34(Suppl 1):S3Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chambers TJ, Dunn CJ (1982) The effect of parathyroid hormone, 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol and prostaglandins on the cytoplasmic activity of isolated osteoclasts. J Pathol 137:193–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Parfitt AM, Mathews C, Villenueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Rao D, Frame B (in press) Relationships between surface, volume and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis: implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin InvestGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Parfitt AM (1984) Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences. Calcif Tissue Int 36(Suppl):123–128Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Baron R (1977) Importance of the intermediate phases between resorption and formation in the measurement and understanding of the bone remodeling sequence. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Bone and Mineral Research. Calif Tissue Int 34(Suppl) Paris, p 179Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Baron R, Vignery A, Tran Van P (1980) The significance of lacunar erosion without osteoclasts: studies on the reversal phase of the remodeling sequence. Metab Bone Dis et Rel Res 2S:35–40Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tran Van P, Vignery A, Baron R (1982) An electron-microscopic study of the bone-remodeling sequence in the rat. Cell Tissue Res 225:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Parfitt AM, Villanueva AR, Crouch MM, Mathews CHE, Duncan H (1977) Classification of osteoid seams by combined use of cell morphology and tetracycline labelling. Evidence for intermittency of mineralization. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Bone histomorphometry: 2nd Intl Workshop. Armour Montagu, Paris, p 299Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kimmel DB (1981) A light microscopic description of osteoprogenitor cells of remodeling bone in the adult. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry. 3rd Int Workshop. Armour Montagu, Paris, p 181Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Owen M (1982) Bone growth at the cellular level: a perspective. In: Dixon AD, Sarnat BG (eds) Factors and mechanisms influencing bone growth. Alan R Liss, New York, p 19Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Westen H, Bainton DF (1979) Association of alkaline-phosphatase-positive reticulum cells in bone marrow with granulocytic precursors. J Exp Med 150:919–937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Roberts WE, Mozsary PG, Klingler E (1982) Nuclear size as a cell-kinetic marker for osteoblast differentiation. Am J Anat 165:373–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Roberts WE, Chase DC (1981) Kinetics of cell proliferation and migration associated with orthodontically-induced osteogenesis. J Dent Res 60:174–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Howard GA, Bottemiller BL, Baylink DJ (1980) Evidence for the coupling of bone formation to bone resorption in vitro. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 2:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Riggs BL (1981) Osteoporosis—a disease of impaired homeostatic regulation? Mineral Electrolyte Metab 5:265–272Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Farley JR, Masuda T, Wergedal JE, Baylink DJ (1982) Human skeletal growth factor: characterization of the mitogenic effect on bone cells in vitro. Biochemistry 21:3508–3513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Drivdahl RH, Howard GA, Baylink DJ (1982) Extracts of bone contain a potent regulator of bone formation. Biochim Biophys Acta 714:26–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Urist MR, DeLange RJ, Finerman GAM (1983) Bone cell differentiation and growth factors. Science 220:680–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Mundy GR, Rodan SB, Majeska RJ, DeMartino S, Trimmier C, Martin TJ, Rodan GA (1982) Unidirectional migration of osteosarcoma cells with osteoblast characteristics in response to products of bone resorption. Calcif Tissue Int 34:542–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Raisz LG, Canalis EM, Dietrich JW, Kream BE, Gworek SC (1978) Hormonal regulation of bone formation. Rec Prog Horm Res 34:335–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Raisz LG, Kream BE (1983) Regulation of bone formation. N Engl J Med 309:29–35; 83–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Triffitt JT (1980) The organic matrix of bone tissue. In: Urist MR (ed) Fundamental and clinical bone physiology. JB Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jones SJ, Hogg NM, Shapiro IM, Slusarenko M, Boyde A (1981) Cells with Fc receptors in the cell layer next to osteoblasts and osteoclasts on bone. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 2:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Boskey AL (1981) Current concepts of the physiology and biochemistry of calcification. Clin Orthop 157:225–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Arsenault AL, Ottensmeyer FP (1983) Quantitative spatial distributions of calcium, phosphorus, and sulfur in calcifying epiphysis by high resolution electron spectrscopic imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:1322–1326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Parfitt AM, Villanueva AR, Mathews CHE, Aswani JA (1981) Kinetics of matrix and mineral apposition in osteoporosis and renal osteodystrophy: relationship to rate of turnover and to cell morphology. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry: 3rd Intl Workshop. Armour Montagu, Paris, p 213Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Eriksen EF, Mosekilde L, Melsen F. Reconstruction of the formative site in iliac trabecular bone: a kinetic model for matrix and mineral apposition in 20 normal individuals. In: Abst 17th European Symposium on Calcified Tissues. Calcif Tissue Int 35(Suppl):A8Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Marotti G, Zambonin Zallone A, Ledda M (1975) Number, size and arrangement of osteoblasts in osteons at different stages of formation. In: Nielsen SP, Hjorting-Hansen E (eds) Calcified Tissues 1975. Proc XIth European Symposium on Calcified Tissue. Fadl's Forlag, Copenhagen, p 96Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Zamboni Zallone A (1977) Relationships between shape and size of the osteoblasts and the accreation rate of trabecular bone surfaces. Anat Embryol 152:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Volpi G, Palazzini S, Cane V, Remaggi F, Muglia MA (1981) Morphometric analysis of osteoblast dynamics in the chick embryo tibia. Anat Embryol 162:393–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wronski TJ, Smith JM, Jee WSS (1981) Variation in mineral apposition rate of trabecular bone within the beagle skeleton. Calcif Tissue Int 33:583–586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Johnson LC (1964) Morphologic analysis in pathology: the kinetics of disease and general biology of bone. In: Frost HM (ed) Bone biodynamics. Little, Brown and Co, Boston, p 543Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bordier PJ, Marie P, Miravet L, Ryckewaert A, Rasmussen H (1976) Morphological and morphometrical characteristics of the mineralization front. A vitamin D regulated sequence of the bone remodeling. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Bone histomorphometry. Intl Workshop, Armour Montagu, Paris, p 335Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Jaworski ZFG, Hooper C (1980) Study of cell kinetics within evolving secondary haversian systems. J Anat 131:91–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lanyon LE, Goodship AE, Pye CJ, MacFie JH (1982) Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomech 15:141–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Cowin S (1984) Mechanical Modeling of the Stress Adaptation Process in Bone. Calcif Tissue Int 36(Suppl):98–103Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kardos TB, Hubbard MJ (1982) Are matrix vesicles apoptotic bodies? In: Dixon AD, Sarnat BG (eds) Factors and mechanisms influencing bone growth. Alan R Liss, New York, p 45Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Meunier PJ, Briancon D, Vignon E, Arlot M, Charhon S (1981) Effects of combined therapy with sodium fluoride-vitamin D-calcium on vertebral fracture risk and bone histology in osteoporosis. In: DeLuca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS, Johnston CC, Parfitt AM (eds) Osteoporosis: recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. University Park Press, Baltimore, p 449Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Parfitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Bone and Mineral Research Laboratory, Department of MedicineHenry Ford HospitalDetroit

Personalised recommendations