Mean wall thickness and formation periods of trabecular bone packets in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis
- 59 Downloads
We have compared the mean wall thickness (MWT) and active formation periods (sigmaf(A)) of trabecular bone packets in iliac crest biopsies from 20 patients (7 male, 13 female) with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CS-OP) and 20 age- and sex-matched controls. The trabecular bone volume (TBV) of the CS-OP patients (9.6%±2.2% [SD]) was significantly reduced compared to controls (19.3%±5.1%). The MWT of CS-OP patients (32.7±4.3 µm) was also significantly lower than the control value (48.0±6.2 µm). There was a positive correlation between MWT and TBV in both groups. The mineralization rate (M) of the CS-OP patients (0.54±0.25 µm/day) was within the normal range, and since there was no increase in osteoid seam thickness, so therefore was the osteoblastic appositional rate (OAR). The active formation period of trabecular bone packets (sigmaf(A)=MWT/M) was significantly lower in the CS-OP patients (55.9 ± 14.4 days) than in the control group (68.1 ± 9.4 days). MWT and sigmaf(A) both decreased with age in the control group, whereas in the CS-OP group they were independent of age.
We conclude that corticosteroid therapy results in a reduction of the MWT of trabecular bone packets and, consequently, of TBV. In these patients, where the OAR was normal, the reduction in MWT was apparently caused by a shortening of the lifespan of the active osteoblastic population at the basic multicellular unit (BMU) level.
Key wordsBone remodeling Histomorphometry Corticosteroid therapy Osteoporosis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Cushing H (1932) The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestation (pituitary basophilism). Bull Johns Hopkins 50:137–195Google Scholar
- 3.Jee WSS, Clark I (1981) Gluco-corticoid induced osteoporosis. In: De Luca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS, Johnston CC, Parfitt AM (eds) Osteoporosis. Park Press, Baltimore, 1981, pp 331–342Google Scholar
- 4.Frost HM (1964) Dynamics of bone remodeling. In: Frost HM (ed) Bone biodynamics. Little, Brown and Co, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 10.Meunier PJ, Edouard C, Courpron P (1976) Morphometric analysis of trabecular resorption surfaces in normal iliac bone. In: Jaworski ZFG (ed) Bone morphometry. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, pp 156–160Google Scholar
- 11.Meunier P, Edouard C, Courpron P, Toussant F (1975) Morphometric analysis of osteoid in iliac trabecular bone. In: Norman AW et al (eds) Vitamin D and problems related to uremic bone disease. W de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 149–155Google Scholar
- 13.Frost HM (1977) A method of analysis of trabecular bone dynamics. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Bone histomorphometry, second international workshop, Lyon, 1976. Societé de la Nouvelle Imprimerie Fournié, Toulouse, pp 445–476Google Scholar
- 14.Frost HM (1981) Resting seams: “on” and “off” in lamellar bone forming centers. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt Am (eds) Proceedings of the third international workshop on bone histomorphometry. Societe Nouvelle de Publications Medicales et Dentaires, Paris, pp 167–170Google Scholar
- 15.Meunier PJ, Courpron P, Edouard C, Alexandre C, Bressot C, Lips P, Boyce BF (1979) In: Barzel US (ed) Bone histomorphometry in osteoporotic states. Osteoporosis II. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 27–47Google Scholar
- 16.Frost HM (1973) Bone remodeling and its relationship to metabolic bone diseases. Charles C Thomas, Springfield ILGoogle Scholar
- 22.Meunier PJ, Bressot C (1982) Endocrine influences on bone cells and bone remodeling evaluated by clinical histomorphometry. In: Parsons J (ed) Endocrin. of calcium metabolism. Raven Press, New York (in press)Google Scholar