Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 93, Issue 1–4, pp 225–242 | Cite as

Short-term physiological responses of mosses to atmospheric ammonium and nitrate

  • Adrian Soares
  • John Pearson


Many bryophytes rely to a large extent on atmospheric deposition for their nutrient uptake. However, increasing levels of atmospheric ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) attract concern as to the possible harmful effects on bryophytes from these two nutrient sources. Changes in nitrate reductase (NR) activities, cation (Ca, K and Mg), total nitrogen (N) and organic acid concentrations were investigated for the mosses,Racomitrium lanuginosum, Rytidiadelphus loreus andPhilonotis fontana, in response to a single field misting with 3 mol−3 NH4+ and NO3-. Increases of 20% were recorded for tissue N content, 48 hr after misting with N containing solutions. When labelled15NH4+ or15NO3- were applied toR. Lanuginosum at 1, 3 and 6 mol m−3 concentrations, partitioning of incorporated15N between different tissue regions occured, with the highest N uptake in the upper stem and leaves. High concentrations of applied N resulted in reduced efficiency of N uptake. NH4+ applications caused declines in NR activities, organic acids and cations, whereas, NO3- treatments caused the reverse response. Changes in cation contents, organic acids and NR activity reflect short-term regulation of N metabolism in the presence of defined N sources, as well as potential mechanisms of regulating cell pH homoeostasis. The consistency of physiological responses, especially NR activities, over short-term pollution episodes, provides evidence for their use as indicators of both NH4+ and NO3- pollution.

Key words

nitrogen pollution nitrate reductase organic acids cations ammonium nitrate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aerts, R., Wallen, B. and Malmer, N.: 1992,J. Ecol. 80, 131.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, S. E.: 1974,Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Anon.: 1990,Acid Deposition in the United Kingdom 1986–1988. Third report of the United Kingdom Review group on Acid Rain, Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, J. A., Thompson, D. B. A. and Lee, J. A.: 1994,Environ. Pollut. 84, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrie, A. and Lemley, M.: 1989,International Laboratory 19, 82.Google Scholar
  6. Bates, J. W.: 1992,J. Bryol. 17, 223.Google Scholar
  7. Bates, J. W.: 1994,Functional Ecology 8, 686.Google Scholar
  8. Van der Eerden, L. J.: 1992,Fertilising Effects of Atmospheric Ammonia on Semi Natural Vegetation, Publication from Agricultural Research Department, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Fangmeier, A. F. Hadwiger-Fangmeier, A., van der Eerden, L. and Jäger, H. J.: 1994,Environ Pollut. 86, 43–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farmer, A. M., Bates, J. W. and Bell, J. N. B.: 1992,Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, pp. 284–313.Google Scholar
  11. Flaig, H. and Mohr, H.: 1992,Physiologia Plantarum,84 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filner, P.: 1966,Biochimica and Biophysica Acta 118, 299.Google Scholar
  13. Greven, H. C.: 1992,Dissertationes Botanicae, No. 194.Google Scholar
  14. Hallingbäck, T.: 1992,Biological Conservation 59, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jönsdöttir, I. S., Callaghan, T. V. and Lee, J. A.: 1995,The Science of the Total Environment,160/161, 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kooijman, A. M. and Bakker, C.: 1994,Aquatic Botany 48, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, J. A. and Studholme, C. J.: 1992,Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, pp. 314–332.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, J. A., Tallis, J. H. and Woodin, S. J.: 1988,Ecological Change in the Uplands, Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp. 151–162.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, R. B., Purves, J. V., Ratcliffe, R. G. and Saker, L. R.: 1992,Journal of Experimental Botany,43, 1385.Google Scholar
  20. McCullough, H.: 1967,Clinica Chimica Acta 17, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mollering, H.: 1985a,Methods of Enzymatic Analysis: Metabolites 2, 3rd Ed. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 39–47.Google Scholar
  22. Mollering, H.: 1985b,Methods of Enzymatic Analysis: Metabolites 2, 3rd Ed. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 2–12.Google Scholar
  23. Morgan, S. M., Lee, J. A. and Ashenden, T. W.: 1992,New Phytol. 120, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Padidam, M., Venkateswarlu, K. and Johri, M. M.: 1991,Plant Science 75, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearson, J. and Stewart, G. R.: 1993,New Phytol. 125, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pérez-Soba, M.: 1995,Physiological Modulation of Scots Pine Trees by Atmospheric Ammonia, PhD thesis, Department of Biology, University of Gronigen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. Pitcairn, C. E. R., Fowler, D. and Grace, J.: 1995,Environ. Pollut. 88, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raven, J. A.: 1988, CEC Report No. EUR 11738 EN, Belgium, pp. 187–195.Google Scholar
  29. Raven, J. A., Wollenweber, B. and Handley, L. L.: 1992a,New Phytol. 121, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raven, J. A., Wollenweber, B. and Handley, L. L.: 1992b,New Phytol. 121, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodenkirchen, H.: 1992,Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 61, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rudolph, H. and Voigt, J. U.: 1986,Physiologica Plantarum 66, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, A. J. E.: 1980,The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Soares, A., Ming, J. Y. and Pearson, J.: 1995,Environ. Pollut. 87, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steinnes, E., Hanssen, J. E. and Rambaek, J. P.: 1994,Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 74, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart, G. R. and Orebamjo, T. O.: 1979,New Phytol. 83, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stewart, G. R., Schmidt, S., Handley, L. L., Turnbull, M. H., Erskine, P. D. and Joly, C. A.: 1995,Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sutton, M. A. and Fowler, D.: 1993,Critical Loads Concepts and Applications, ITE Symposium No. 28, HMSO, London, pp. 119–126.Google Scholar
  39. Tallis, J. H.: 1959,J. Ecol. 47, 325.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, D. B. A. and Baddeley, J.: 1991,Focus on Nature Conservation, No. 26. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
  41. Woodin, S. J. and Lee, J. A.: 1987,New Phytol. 105, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Soares
    • 1
  • John Pearson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations