Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 59, Issue 1–4, pp 145–148 | Cite as

Evaluation of the magnetic moments of radium isotopes

  • R. Neugart
  • E. W. Otten
  • K. Wendt
  • S. Ahmad
  • N. Panigrahy
  • R. W. Dougherty
  • K. C. Mishra
  • T. P. Das
  • J. Andriessen
Hyperfine Interactions in Atomic and Nuclear Physics

Abstract

Using the relativistic linked cluster many-body perturbation procedure we have obtained the hyperfine field at the nucleus of the Ra+ ion in the2S1/2 ground state. There is good agreement between the calculated magnetic moment of213Ra and the results of a recent Zeeman measurement by the collinear laser beam technique. Detailed comparison is carried out between our result and earlier ones.

Keywords

Thin Film Radium Laser Beam Detailed Comparison Hyperfine Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. /1/.
    M. Arnold et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 771CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. /2/.
    R. Neugart, inLasers in Nuclear Physics edited by C. E. Bemis and H. K. Carter (Harwood, New York, 1982) p. 231Google Scholar
  3. /3/.
    See, for instance, J. Andriessen, K. Raghunathan, S. N. Ray and T. P. Das, Phys. Rev. B 15 (1977) 2533CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. /4/.
    V. A. Dzuba et al., Phys. Scr. 32 (1985) 507ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. /5/.
    J. L. Heully and A. M. Martensson-Pendrill, Phys. Scr. 31 (1985) 169ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. /6/.
    See, for instance, T. P. Das, Hyperfine Interactions 34 (1987) 149 and references thereinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. /7/.
    H. Kopfermann,Nuclear Moments (Academic Press, New York, 1958), p. 130Google Scholar
  8. /8/.
    K. A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 100 (1955) 36; J. Goldstone, Proc. Roy. Soc. A239 (1957) 267CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. /9/.
    The 13% reduction for Fr is from the present work and is in reasonable agreement with earlier results (M. Vajed-Samii et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1330; 49 (1982) 1466, 1800)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. /10/.
    K. Wendt, S. A. Ahmad, W. Klempt, R. Neugart, E. W. Otten and H. H. Stroke, Z. Phys. D4 (1987) 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. /11/.
    For a brief treatment of this method see K. J. Duff and T. P. Das, Phys. Rev. 168 (1968) 43CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer A.G., Scientific Publishing Company 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Neugart
    • 1
  • E. W. Otten
    • 1
  • K. Wendt
    • 1
  • S. Ahmad
    • 2
  • N. Panigrahy
    • 2
  • R. W. Dougherty
    • 2
  • K. C. Mishra
    • 2
  • T. P. Das
    • 2
  • J. Andriessen
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut für Physik Universität MainzFRG
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsState University of New York at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.Technische NatuurkundeTechnische Hogeschool DelftDelftNetherlands

Personalised recommendations