Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 111–126 | Cite as

Two children's anticipations, beliefs, and motivations

  • Paul Cobb
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses the roles played by anticipation, belief, and motivation in two young children's problem solving activity. It is argued that a solver's beliefs and motivations are intimately related. The analysis also identifies an increasingly global hierarchy of anticipations corresponding to specific conceptual structures or problem representations, heuristics, and beliefs. Analogies drawn from the philosophy of science and from the field of artificial intelligence are used to illustrate that the discussion of the two children's behaviors may have some generality.

Keywords

Young Child Artificial Intelligence Conceptual Structure Problem Representation Global Hierarchy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes B.: 1982,T. S. Kuhn and Social Science, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Baroody A. J., Ginsburg H. P., and Waxman B.: 1983, ‘Children's use of mathematical structure’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 14, 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cobb, P.: 1983a,Children's Strategies for Finding Sums and Differences, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, P.: 1983b,Context and Cognition — A View from Below, Paper presented at the Bergamo Conference on Curriculum Theorizing, Dayton, OH.Google Scholar
  5. Confrey, J.: 1982,Examining Ninth-grade Students' Mathematical Abilities Through Clinical Interviews, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.Google Scholar
  6. Erlwanger S. H.: 1973, ‘Benny's concept of rules and answers in IPI mathematics’,Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior 1, 7–26.Google Scholar
  7. Greene M.: 1971, ‘Curriculum and consciousness’,Teachers College Record 73, 253–269.Google Scholar
  8. Hofstadter D. R.: 1980,Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Knorr K. D.: 1980, ‘The scientist as an analogical reasoner: A critique of the metaphor theory of innovation’, in K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn, and R. Whitley (eds.),The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Kuhn T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Lakatos I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, England.Google Scholar
  12. Lakatos I.: 1977,Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge University Press, England.Google Scholar
  13. Laudan L.: 1977,Progress and its Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  14. Maturana H. R.: 1978, ‘Biology of language: The epistemology of reality’, in G. A. Miller and E. Lennenberg (eds.),Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lennenberg, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Minsky, M.: 1975, ‘A framework for representing knowledge’, in P. H. Winston (ed.),The Psychology of Computer Vision, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
  16. Nicholls, J. G.: 1983, ‘Conceptions of ability and achievement motivations: A theory and its implications for education’, in S. G. Paris, G. M. Olson and W. H. Stevenson (eds.),Learning and Motivation in the Classroom, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
  17. Piaget J.: 1964, ‘Development and learning’, in R. E. Ripple and V. N. Rockcastle (eds.),Piaget Rediscovered: A Report of the Conference on Cognitive Studies and Curriculum Development, Cornell University Press, Ithica, N.Y.Google Scholar
  18. Piaget J.: 1971,Biology and Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  19. Quine W. V.: 1964, ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’, in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.),Philosophy of Mathematics, Selected Readings, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood, N.J.Google Scholar
  20. Schoenfeld A. H.: 1978,Problem Solving Strategies in College Level Mathematics, unpublished manuscript, University of California, Physics Department, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. Schoenfeld A. H.: 1982, ‘Some thoughts on problem-solving research and mathematics education’, in F. K. Lester and J. Garofalo (eds.),Mathematical Problem Solving: Issues in Research, Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  22. Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1983,Theoretical and Pragmatic Issues in the Design of Mathematical “Problem-Solving”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
  23. Silver E. A.: 1982, ‘Knowledge organization and mathematical problem solving’, in F. K. Lester and J. Garofalo (eds.),Mathematical Problem Solving: Issues in Research, Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  24. Skemp R. R.: 1976, ‘Relational understanding and instrumental understanding’,Mathematics Teaching 77, 1–7.Google Scholar
  25. Skemp R. R.: 1979,Intelligence, Learning, and Action, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Weizenbaum J. L.: 1968, ‘Contextual understanding by computers’, in P. A. Kolers and M. Eden (eds.),Recognizing Patterns: Studies in Living and Automatic Systems, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  27. Wertime R.: 1979, ‘Students, problems and “courage spans”’, in J. Lockhead and J. Clements (eds.)Cognitive Processes Instruction, Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  28. Wimsatt W. C.: 1981, ‘Robustness, reliability and multiple-determination in science’, in M. Brewer and B. Collins (eds.),Knowing and Validating in the Social Sciences: A Tribute to Donald T. Campbell, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  29. Winograd T.: 1973, ‘A procedural model of language understanding’, in R. Shank and K. Colby (eds.),Computer Models of Thought and Language, W. H. Freeman Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Cobb
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations