Environmental Management

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 809–814 | Cite as

Social organization in deer: Implications for localized management

  • William F. Porter
  • Nancy E. Mathews
  • H. Brian Underwood
  • Richard W. SageJr.
  • Donald F. Behrend


Populations of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) inhabiting many state and national parks and suburban areas have grown to the point that they conflict with human activities. Conflicts range from destruction of vegetation through browsing to public perception that diseases carried by deer pose threats to human health. Traditional modes of hunting to control populations are inappropriate in many of these areas because of intense human development and activity. This article explores an alternative approach for population reduction based on deer social organization. Female white-tailed deer are highly philopatric and female offspring remain near their dams for life. This suggests that a population expands slowly as a series of overlapping home ranges in a form analogous to the petals on a rose. Incorporating the rose petal concept into a model of population growth shows that removal of deer by family unit can potentially alleviate conflicts in localized areas for as many as 10–15 yr.

Key words

White-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus Behavior Philopatry Population management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Behrend, D. F., G. F. Mattfeld, W. C. Tierson, and J. E. Wiley, III. 1970. Deer density control for comprehensive forest management.Journal of Forestry 68:695–700.Google Scholar
  2. Bunnell, F. L., and A. S. Harestad. 1983. Dispersal and dispersion of black-tailed deer: Models and observations.Journal of Mammalogy 64:201–209.Google Scholar
  3. Connelly, N. A., D. J. Decker, and S. Wear. 1987. Public tolerance of deer in a suburban environment: implications for management and control. Pages 207–281in N. R. Holler (ed.). Proceedings of the third eastern wildlife damage control conference.Google Scholar
  4. Dusek G. L., R. J. Mackie, J. D. Herriges, and B. B. Compton. 1989. Population ecology of white-tailed deer along the lower Yellowstone River.Wildlife Monograph 104:1–68.Google Scholar
  5. Fretwell, S. D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 217 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Hawkins, R. F., and W. D. Klimstra. 1970. A preliminary study of the social organization of white-tailed deer.Journal of Wildlife Management 34:407–419.Google Scholar
  7. Holekamp, K. E., and P. W. Sherman. 1989. Why male ground squirrels disperse.American Scientist 77:232–239.Google Scholar
  8. Kammermeyer, K. E., and R. L. Marchinton. 1976. Notes on dispersal of male white-tailed deer.Journal of Mammalogy 57:776–778.Google Scholar
  9. Larson, T. J., O. J. Rongstad, and F. W. Terbilcox. 1978. Movement and habitat use of white-tailed deer in southcentral Wisconsin.Journal of Wildlife Management 42:113–117.Google Scholar
  10. Leopold, A. 1933. Game management. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 481 pp.Google Scholar
  11. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 203 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Manlove, M. N., M. H. Smith, O. H. Hillestad, S. E. Fuller, P. E. Johns, and D. O. Straney. 1978. Genetic subdivision in a herd of white-tailed deer as demonstrated by spatial shifts in gene frequencies.Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Southeast Fish and Wildlife Agencies 30:808–814.Google Scholar
  13. Mathews, N. E. 1989. Social structure, genetic structure and anti-predator behavior of white-tailed deer in the central Adirondacks. Dissertation. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, 181 pp.Google Scholar
  14. McCullough, D. R. 1979. The George Research deer herd. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 271 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Michael, E. D. 1965. Movements of white-tailed deer on the Welder Wildlife Refuge.Journal of Wildlife Management 29:44–52.Google Scholar
  16. Nelson, M. E. 1990. Gene flow, effective population size and genetic population structure in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in northeastern Minnesota. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  17. Nelson, M. F., and L. D. Mech. 1984. Home range formation and dispersal of deer in northeastern Minnesota.Journal of Mammalogy 65:567–575.Google Scholar
  18. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation.American Naturalist 132:652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sage, R. W., Jr., W. C. Tierson, G. F. Mattfeld, and D. F. Behrend. 1983. White-tailed deer visibility and behavior along forest roads.Journal of Wildlife Management 47:940–953.Google Scholar
  20. Sillings, J. L. 1987. White-tailed deer studies in a suburban community: ground counts, impacts on natural vegetation, and electric fencing to control browsing. Thesis. University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 87 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Skellum, J. G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations.Biometrika 38:196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, M. H., K. B. Willis, and P. E. Johns. 1989. Spatial-genetic variability in a white-tailed deer herd. Proceedings of the international congress of game biologists, Norway (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Storm, G. L., R. H. Yahner, D. F. Cottam, and G. F. Vecellio. 1989. Population status, movements, habitat use and impact of white-tailed deer at Gettysburg National Military Park and Eisenhower National Historic Site, Pennsylvania. United States Department of Interior National Park Service Technical Report MAR/NRTR-89/043, 123 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Telford, S. R., III, T. N. Mather, S. I. Moore, M. L. Wilson, and A. Speilman. 1988. Incompetence of deer as reservoirs of the Lyme disease spirochete.American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 39:105–109.Google Scholar
  25. Tierson, W. C., G. F. Mattfeld, R. W. Sage, Jr., and D. F. Behrend. 1985. Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in the Adirondacks.Journal of Wildlife Management 49:760–769.Google Scholar
  26. Underwood, H. B. 1986. Population dynamics of a central Adirondack deer herd: Responses to intensive population and forest management. Thesis. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, 196 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Underwood, H. B. 1990. Population dynamics of white-tailed deer in a fluctuation environment. Dissertation. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, 150 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Underwood, H. B., K. A. Austin, W. F. Porter, R. L. Burgess, and R. W. Sage, Jr. 1991. Deer and vegetation interactions on Saratoga National Historical Park. United State Department of Interior National Park Service, Boston, Massachusetts (in press).Google Scholar
  29. Urbston, D. F. 1967. Herd dynamics in a pioneer-like deer population.Southeast Association of Fish and Game Commissioners 21:42–57.Google Scholar
  30. Verme, L. J. 1973. Movements of white-tailed deer in upper Michigan.Journal of Wildlife Management 37:545–552.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, M. L., J. F. Levine, and A. Spielman. 1984. Effect of deer reduction on abundance of deer tick,Ixodes dammini.Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 57:697–705.Google Scholar
  32. Witham J. H., and J. M. Jones. 1987. Deer-human interactions and research in the Chicago metropolitan area,in L. W. Adams and D. L. Leedy (eds.), Proceedings of a national symposium on urban wildlife. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • William F. Porter
    • 1
  • Nancy E. Mathews
    • 1
  • H. Brian Underwood
    • 1
  • Richard W. SageJr.
    • 2
  • Donald F. Behrend
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental and Forest BiologyState University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Adirondack Ecological CenterState University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestryNewcombUSA
  3. 3.University of Alaska-AnchorageAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations