Environmental Management

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 581–587 | Cite as

Ethnicity and hazard information dissemination

  • Ronald W. Perry
  • Lisa Nelson


Citizens from two communities were questioned regarding the sources from which they have previously obtained information about environmental hazards and their preferences for different communication channels. Three ethnic groups—whites, blacks, and Mexican-Americans—were represented among those questioned. While all three ethnic groups described similar patterns of past information receipt, it was found that Mexican-Americans obtained more information through social network contacts than whites or blacks. Ethnic differentials emerged when citizens were asked about preferred sources for information receipt. While radio was identified as desirable by all three groups, only minority citizens expressed a preference for local television as a dissemination mode and only Mexican-Americans favored neighborhood meetings. Mailed dissemination and newspapers were preferred primarily by whites and blacks. The implications of the results for the conduct of hazard information dissemination are examined.

Key words

Dissemination Hazard planning Ethnicity Race Preparedness Hazard education 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Douglas, I. and J. Hobbs. 1979. Public and private reaction to three flood events in north-western New South Wales. Pages 251–259in R. Heathcote and B. Thom (eds.), Natural hazards in Australia. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. Drabek, T. 1986. Human responses to disaster. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Foster, H. 1980. Disaster planning. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Meltzner, A. 1979. The communication of scientific information to the wider public.Minerva 17(3):331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mileti, D., J. Hutton, and J. Sorenson. 1981. Earthquake prediction response and options for public policy. University of Colorado Program on Technology, Environment and Man, Monograph Number 31, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  6. Perry, R. 1985. Comprehensive emergency management. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  7. Perry, R. 1987. Disaster preparedness and response among minority citizens. Pages 135–153in R. Dynes, B. DeMarchi, and C. Pelanda (eds.), Sociology of disasters. Franco Angeli Publishers, Milan.Google Scholar
  8. Perry, R. 1990. Volcanic hazard perceptions at Mt. Shasta. The Environmental Professional 12:1–7.Google Scholar
  9. Perry, R., and M. Lindell. 1989. Communicating threat information for volcano hazards. Pages 47–63in L. Walters, L. Wilkins and T. Walters (eds.), Bad tidings: Communication and catastrophe. Laurence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  10. Regulska, J. 1982. Public awareness programs for natural hazards. Pages 36–70in T. Sarinnen (ed.), Perspectives on increasing hazard awareness. University of Colorado Program on Technology, Environment and Man Monograph Number 37, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  11. Shibutani, T. 1966. Improvised news. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
  12. Travis, R., and W. Reibsame. 1979. Communicating environmental uncertainty.Journal of Geography 78(5):168–172.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald W. Perry
    • 1
  • Lisa Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public AffairsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations