Environmental Management

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 451–464 | Cite as

Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in western prairies: Probable causes and prospects for mitigation

  • Stewart B. Rood
  • John M. Mahoney
Profile

Abstract

Although historically abundant, the riparian poplar forests of the western prairies are now endangered as a result of the damming and diversion of rivers in this region. Recent reports have described substantial declines of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in Alberta, Canada; Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, and Arizona, USA. The present report analyzes the forest and hydrological conditions reported previously in order to clarify the causes of the downstream forest decline.

Dams were found to contribute to forest failure by (1) reducing downstream flows and/or (2) altering flow patterns to attenuate spring flooding and/or stabilize summer flows. Reduced flows are reported to induce drought stress, which is particularly lethal to seedlings and very old poplars. The artificial moderation of spring flooding may inhibit the formation of seedbeds essential for seedling replenishment. Increased river valley development involving cattle grazing, agricultural clearing, and direct harvesting of trees also contributes to forest failure.

Potential methods for mitigating the impacts of dams on downstream forests include downstream flow schedules that (1) retain occasional spring flooding, (2) taper off rather than abruptly drop downstream flow, and (3) provide adequate flows throughout the summer. Poplar forest stabilization and recovery can be further promoted by fencing to protect trees from livestock grazing and trampling, or artificial site preparation such as cultivation or scarification to encourage poplar regeneration.

Key words

Poplars River damming Riparian vegetation Environmental mitigation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Akashi, Y. 1988. Riparian vegetation dynamics along the Bighorn River, Wyoming. MSc Thesis. Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie.Google Scholar
  2. Albertson, F. W., and J. E. Weaver. 1945. Injury and death or recovery of trees in prairie climate.Ecological Monographs 15:395–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. W., and R. D. Ohmart. 1979. Riparian revegetation: an approach to mitigating for a disappearing habitat in the Southwest. Pages 481–487in G. A. Swanson (ed.), The mitigation symposium: a national workshop on mitigating losses of fish and wildlife habitats. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-65. Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  4. Ashton, G. D. 1979. River ice.American Scientist 67:38–45.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, W. J. 1985. Population dynamics of woody plants on a river island.Canadian Journal of Botany 63:647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behan, M. 1981. The Missouri's stately cottonwoods, how we can save them?Montana Magazine Sept:76–77.Google Scholar
  7. Blake, T. J., N. P. Cain, R. Gadziola, C. I. Hillis, and T. Zitnak. 1982. Ethylene and auxin improve the rooting of difficult-to-root poplar cuttings. Proceedings of the North American Poplar Council, 19th Annual Meeting, Rhinelander, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  8. Bradley, C., and D. G. Smith. 1984. Meandering channel response to altered flow regime: Milk River, Alberta and Montana.Water Resources Research 20:1913–1920.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, C., and D. G. Smith. 1986. Plains cottonwood recruitment and survival on a prairie meandering river floodplain, Milk River, southern Alberta and northern Montana.Canadian Journal of Botany 64:1433–1442.Google Scholar
  10. Brayshaw, T. C. 1965. Native poplars of southern Alberta and their hybrids. Canadian Department of Forestry, Publication 1109. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, D. E., C. H. Lowe, and J. F. Hausler. 1977. Southwestern riparian communities: their biotic importance and management in Arizona. Pages 201–211in R. R. Johnson and D. A. Jones (eds.), Importance, preservation and management of the riparian habitat: a symposium. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  12. Ciesla, W. M. 1989. Aerial photos for assessment of forest decline—a multinational overview.Journal of Forestry 87:37–41.Google Scholar
  13. Colby, B. R. 1964. Scour and fill in sand-bed streams. US Department of Interior, USGS Professional Paper 462-D. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Crouch, G. L. 1979a. Changes in the vegetation complex of a cottonwood ecosystem on the South Platte River.Great Plains Agricultural Council 91:19–22.Google Scholar
  15. Crouch, G. L. 1979b. Long-term changes in cottonwoods on a grazed and an ungrazed plains bottomland in northeastern Colorado. USDA Forest Service Research Note RM-370. Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  16. Dickmann, D. I., and K. W. Stuart. 1983. The culture of poplars in eastern North America. Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michiga.Google Scholar
  17. Eckenwalder, J. E. 1984. Natural intersectional hybridization between North American species ofPopulus (Salicaceae) in sectionsAigeiros andTacamahaca. II. Taxonomy.Canadian Journal of Botany 62:325–335.Google Scholar
  18. Ellison, L., and E. J. Woolfolk. 1937. Effects of drought on vegetation near Miles City, Montana.Ecology 18:329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engstrom, A. 1948. Growing cottonwood from seed.Journal of Forestry 46:130–132.Google Scholar
  20. Everitt, B. L. 1968. Use of the cottonwood in an investigation of the recent history of a flood plain.American Journal of Science 266:417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farmer, R. E., and F. T. Bonner. 1967. Germination and initial growth of eastern cottonwood as influenced by moisture stress, temperature, and storage.Botanical Gazette 128:211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fenner, P., W. W. Brady, and D. R. Patton. 1984. Observations of seeds and seedlings of Fremont cottonwood.Journal of Desert Plants 6:55–58.Google Scholar
  23. Fenner, P., W. W. Brady, and D. R. Patton. 1985. Effects of regulated water flows on regeneration of Fremont Cottonwood.Journal of Range Management 38:135–138.Google Scholar
  24. Galloway, G., and J. Worrall. 1979. Cladoptosis: a reproductive strategy in black cottonwood?Canadian Journal of Forest Research 9:122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gildart R. C., 1984. Montana's Missouri River. Montana Geographic Series, Number Eight.Montana Magazine, Helena, Montana.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, R. R., C. A. Fox, and R. Risser. 1987. Impacts of hydroelectric development on riparian vegetation in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA.Environmental Management 11:519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hook, D. D., M. M. Murray, D. S. Debell, and B. C. Wilson. 1987. A technique for assessing the influence of shallow water on red alderAlnus rubra Bong family performance. Pages 248–252in Proceedings of the Society of Wetland Scientists' Eighth Annual Meeting, May 26–29, 1987. Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  28. Hosner, J. F. 1957. Effects of water upon the seed germination of bottomland trees.Forest Science 3:67–70.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, W. C., R. L. Burgess, and W. R. Keammerer. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplains in North Dakota.Ecological Monographs 46:59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnston, A. 1987. History of floods in the Oldman River valley at Lethbridge, Lethbridge Historical Society, Lethbridge, Alberta.Google Scholar
  31. Kellogg, R. S. 1905. Forest belts of western Kansas and Nebraska. USDA Forest Service Bulletin 66. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. Kondolf, G. M., J. W. Webb, M. J. Sale, and T. Felando. 1987. Basic hydrologic studies for assessing impacts of flow diversions on riparian vegetation: examples from streams of the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA.Environmental Management 11:757–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McBride, J. R., and J. Strahan. 1984. Establishment and survival of woody riparian species on gravel bars of an intermittent stream.American Midland Naturalist 112:235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McComb, A. L., and H. S. Lovestead. 1954. Viability of cottonwood seeds in relation to storage temperatures and humidities.USDA Forest Service Tree Planters Notes 17:9–11.Google Scholar
  35. Moss, E. H. 1938. Longevity of seed and establishment of seedlings in species ofPopulus.Botanical Gazette 99:529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Noble, M. G. 1979. The origin ofPopulus deltoides andSalix interior zones on point bars along the Minnesota River.American Midland Naturalist 102:59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pallardy, S. G., and T. T. Kozlowski. 1981. Water relations ofPopulus clones.Ecology 62:159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pezeshki, S. R., and T. M. Hinckley. Water relations characteristics ofAlnus rubra andPopulus trichocarpa: responses to field drought.Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:1159–1166.Google Scholar
  39. Phipps, H. M., D. A. Belton, and D. A. Netzer. 1977. Propagating cuttings of somePopulus clones for tree plantations.The Plant Propagator 23(4).Google Scholar
  40. Read, R. A. 1958. Silvical characteristics of plains cottonwood. Rocky Mountain Forest Range Experiment Station Paper 33. Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  41. Reily, P. W., and W. C. Johnson. 1982. The effects of altered hydrologic regime on tree growth along the Missouri River in North Dakota.Canadian Journal of Botany 60:2410–2423.Google Scholar
  42. Rood, S. B. 1988. Potential impact of the Oldman River Dam on downstream vegetation. Pages 137–144in S. B. Rood and F. J. Jankunis (eds.), Economic, environmental, and social aspects of the Oldman River Dam project. University of Lethbridge, Alberta.Google Scholar
  43. Rood, S. B., and S. Heinze-Milne. 1989. Abrupt downstream forest decline following river damming in southern Alberta.Canadian Journal of Botany 67:1744–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rood, S. B., J. S. Campbell, and T. Despins. 1986. Natural popular hybrids from southern Alberta. I. Continuous variation for foliar characteristics.Canadian Journal of Botany 64:1382–1388.Google Scholar
  45. Shaw, R. K. 1976. A taxonomic and ecologic study of the riverbottom forest on St. Mary River, Lee Creek, and Belly River in southwestern Alberta, Canada.The Great Basin Naturalist 36:243–271.Google Scholar
  46. Sorg, C. F., and J. B. Loomis. 1984. Empirical estimates of amenity forest values: a comparative review. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-107. Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  47. Ware, G. H., and W. T. Penfound. 1949. The vegetation of the lower levels of the floodplain of the South Canadian River in central Oklahoma.Ecology 30:478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weaver, J. E. 1960. Flood plain vegetation of the central Missouri Valley and contacts of woodland with prairie.Ecological Monographs 30:37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weaver, J. E., and F. W. Albertson. 1936. Effects of the great drought on the prairies of Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas.Ecology 17:567–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weaver, J. E., H. C. Hanson, and J. M. Aikman. 1925. Transect method of studying woodland vegetation along streams.Botanical Gazette 80:168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, G. P., and M. G. Wolman. 1984. Downstream effects of dams on alluvial rivers. US Department of Interior, USGS Professional Paper 1286. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, R. E. 1970. Succession in stands ofPopulus deltoides along the Missouri River in southeastern South Dakota.The American Midland Naturalist 83:330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolman, M. G., and L. B. Leopold. 1957. River flood plains: some observations on their formation. US Department of Interior, USGS Professional paper 282-C. pp. 87–107. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  54. Zube, E. H., and D. E. Simcox. 1987. Arid lands, riparian landscapes and management conflicts.Environmental Management 11:529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stewart B. Rood
    • 1
  • John M. Mahoney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations