Skip to main content
Log in

The dramaturgical society: A macro-analytic approach to dramaturgical analysis

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the writings of Erving Goffman have illuminated the dramaturgical components of face-to-face interaction, the task of developing a thoroughgoing substantive and theoretical explication of the dramaturgical society remains. This paper explores the utility of a dramaturgical analysis at the macrosocietal level. The character of a dramaturgical society is discussed in the first section. The origins of a critical dramaturgy are presented in the next section. The conditions of social organization which give birth to a dramaturgical society are set forth in the next sections, and the utility of dramaturgy for a self-directed society are weighed in the final section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boorstin, Daniel 1962 The Image. New York: Antheneum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Walter 1968 “Society as a complex adaptive system.” In Walter Buckely, Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kenneth 1954 A Grammar of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1965 Permanence and Change. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, James E. and Michael W. Mansfield, eds. 1976 Drama in Life. New York: Hastings House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Hugh D. 1962 Communication and Social Order. New York: Bedminister.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----1965 “Introduction” to Burke, 1965.

  • Edelman, Murray 1964 The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving 1959 Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1961 Encounters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1967 Interaction Ritual. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin 1970 The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, Joseph 1963 Symbolic Crusade. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen 1970a Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1970b “Toward a theory of communicative competence.” In Hans Peter Dreitzel, ed., Recent Sociology, No. 2. Toronto: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1974 “On social interest.” Telos 19 (Spring):91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, John 1970 “The face of the man without qualities.” Social Research 37 (Winter):547–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichheiser, Gustav 1970 Appearances and Reality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Joachim 1971 Alienation: From Marx to Modern Sociology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, Orrin 1976 “Dramatic encounters.” In Combes and Mansfield, eds., Drama in Life. New York: Hastings House.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, Donald M. 1968 “Towards an information-flow model of human behavior.” In Walter Buckely, ed., Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl 1936 Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert 1964 One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merelman, Richard M. 1969 “The dramaturgy of politics.” Sociological Quarterly 10, 2:216–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Claus 1973 Politics of Communication. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, Dan 1976 “The drama, illusion and reality of political images.” In Combes and Mansfield, eds., Drama in Life. New York: Hastings House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perinbanayagam, R. S. 1975 “The reality of drama.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Midwest Sociological Society, Chicago.

  • Rader, Victoria 1976 “Stratification theory and participation theory.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.

  • Thompson, Victor 1966 Modern Organization. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1946 From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills, eds. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. R. 1972 New Sources of Self. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----1975 “Critical dimensions in dramaturgical analysis: Backstage at the Whitehouse.” Presented at the 1976 American Sociological Association meetings in New York. Draft available from the Red Feather Institute.

  • ----1977 “Radical dimensions in modern systems theory; a general theory of social order and a special theory of social change.” In Western Sociological Review, forthcoming.

  • ----1978 “Critical dimensions in dramaturgical analysis: The division of labor in the construction of social reality.” Draft paper available through Red Feather Institute.

  • Young, T. R. and John R. Brouillette 1976 “Bureaucracy and modern society.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, Miami.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was prepared with the assistance of Jeanne Boland, New Zealand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, T.R., Massey, G. The dramaturgical society: A macro-analytic approach to dramaturgical analysis. Qual Sociol 1, 78–98 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390165

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390165

Keywords

Navigation