Advertisement

Surgery Today

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 993–998 | Cite as

The operative indications for proximal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach

  • Kazuya Kitamura
  • Toshiharu Yamaguchi
  • Satoki Nishida
  • Kazuhito Yamamoto
  • Daisuke Ichikawa
  • Kazuma Okamoto
  • Hiroki Taniguchi
  • Akeo Hagiwara
  • Kiyoshi Sawai
  • Toshio Takahashi
Original Articles

Abstract

While proximal gastrectomy is often performed for early gastric cancer in Japan, it remains unclear whether or not proximal gastrectomy should be performed for advanced gastric cancer. This study was designed to determine the operative indications for proximal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. A total of 1691 patients with gastric cancer were reviewed retrospectively from hospital records during the period from 1969 to 1994, and the clinicopathologic characteristics of 82 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy were compared with those of 150 patients who underwent total gastrectomy. Lymph node metastasis along the lower part of the stomach was observed in gastric cancers which had invaded beyond the muscularis propria of the stomach, but not in those confined to the muscularis propria. Three patients with gastric cancer that had invaded beyond the muscularis propria and metastasized to nodes along the lower part of the stomach were cured by total gastrectomy. However, there was no difference in the postoperative survival rates of the patients treated with proximal gastrectomy and those treated with total gastrectomy, irrespective of tumor stage and depth of invasion. Thus, proximal gastrectomy should be performed for gastric cancer when the depth of invasion is confined to the muscularis propria of the stomach.

Key Words

gastric cancer proximal gastrectomy lymph node metastasis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bradley EL, Isaacs J, Harsh T (1975) Nutritional consequences of total gastrectomy. Ann Surg 182:415–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Higuier M, Lancret JM, Bernard PF (1976) Functional results of different reconstructive procedures after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg 63:704–708Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sagor GR, Ghatei MA, McGregor GP (1981) The influence of an intact pylorus on postprandial enteroglucagon and neurotensin release after upper gastric surgery. Br J Surg 68:190–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papachristou DN, Fortner JG (1980) Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia — the choice of gastrectomy. Ann Surg 192:58–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maruyama K, Kitaoka K, Hirata K, Okabayashi K, Kikuchi S (1983) Surgical treatment for cardiac gastric cancer: total gastrectomy or proximal gastrectomy? (in Japanese with English abstract). Gastroenterol Surg 6:1425–1431Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calan de L, Portier G, Ozoux JP, Rivallain B, Perrier M, Brizon J (1988) Carcinoma of the cardia and proximal third of the stomach — results of surgical treatment in 91 consecutive patients. Am J Surg 155:481–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inberg MV, Heinonen R, Lauren P, Rantakokko V, Viikari SJ (1981) Total and proximal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric carcinoma: a series of 305 cases. World J Surg 5:249–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holscher AH, Siewert JR (1985) Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: results of a European questionnaire (GEEMO). Dig Surg 2:1–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stipa S, Giorgio AD, Ferri M (1991) Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the cardia. Surgery 111:386–393Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1981) The general rules for the Gastric Cancer Study in Surgery and Pathology. Part I. Clinical classification. Jpn J Surg 11:127–139Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1981) The general rules for the Gastric Cancer Study in Surgery and Pathology. Part II. Histologic classification. Jpn J Surg 11:140–145Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaibara N, Nishimura O, Nishidoi H, Kimura O, Koga S (1987) Proximal gastrectomy as the surgical procedure of choice for upper gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 36:110–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inokuchi K, Kadowaki M, Socjima K, Mito Y, Kawasaki S (1974) Criteria on reasonable indication of total gastrectomy (in Japanese with English abstract). Rinsho Geka (J Clin Lung) 29:35–42Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kitamura K, Hagiwara A, Otsuji E, Shimotsuma M, Taniguchi H, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K (1995) Activated carbon-oriented gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 82:647–649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nakamura T, Nakazawa S, Yoshino J (1992) A study on the depth of cancerous invasion in the gastric wall by endoscopic ultrasonography (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Gastroenterol 83:625–634.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuya Kitamura
    • 1
  • Toshiharu Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • Satoki Nishida
    • 1
  • Kazuhito Yamamoto
    • 1
  • Daisuke Ichikawa
    • 1
  • Kazuma Okamoto
    • 1
  • Hiroki Taniguchi
    • 1
  • Akeo Hagiwara
    • 1
  • Kiyoshi Sawai
    • 1
  • Toshio Takahashi
    • 1
  1. 1.First Department of SurgeryKyoto Pretectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations