Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 561–566 | Cite as

Effects of magnesium pertilizer on the vitality and nutrition of a european beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand in the southern Black Forest of West Germany

  • H. P. Ende
  • H. W. Zöttl
Voluntary Paper
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

A naturally regenerating stand of European beech in the Southern Black Forest was fertilized with MgSO4 in order to reduce extreme Mg deficiency diagnosed by symptom, soil, and leaf analyses. Nine weeks later, the Mg content in leaves of fertilized trees was increased by 300% compared with the control plot. Phosphorus and K contents were decreased after fertilization, but did not fall below deficiency levels. An appreciable amount of fertilizer sulfate was taken up, slightly increasing the organic S fraction in leaves. Shoot growth was stimulated within the first vegetation period after treatment. A dose of 500 kg ha−1 MgSO4 was sufficient to achieve these effects.

Keywords

Sulfate Phosphorus Magnesium MgSO4 Control Plot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldinger, E.: 1987, “Elementgehalte im Boden und in Nadeln verschieden stark geschädigter Fichten- und Tannen-Bestände auf Praxiskalkungsflächen im Buntsandstein-Südschwarzwald“,Freiburger Bodenk. Abh.,19, 266 p.Google Scholar
  2. Flückiger, W. and Braun, S.: 1989, “Waldschadensbericht. Untersuchungen in Buchenbeobachtungsflächen 1984–1988”, Institut für Angewandte Pflanzenbiologie, Schönenbuch, Switzerland, 59 p.Google Scholar
  3. Hasel, K.: 1989, “Kleine Beiträge zur Forstgeschichte, insbesondere in Baden.”Schriftenr. d. Landesforstverw. Bad.-Württ. 67, 343 p.Google Scholar
  4. Hofmann, G. and Krauss, H.-H.: 1988,Sozialistische Forstwirtschaft 38, 272.Google Scholar
  5. Hüttl, R.F.: 1985, “‘Neuartige’ Waldschäden und Nährelementversorgung von Fichtenbeständen (Picea abies Karst.) in Südwestdeutschland”,Freiburger Bodenk. Abh. 16, 195 p.Google Scholar
  6. Kelly, J. and Lambert, M.J.: 1972,Plant and Soil 37, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Le Tacon, F. and Toutain, F.: 1973,Annales des Sciences forestières 30, 1.Google Scholar
  8. Liu, J.C.: 1989, “Ernährungskundliche Auswertung von diagnostischen Düngungsversuchen in Fichtenbeständen (Picea abies Karst.) Südwestdeutschlands”,Freiburger Bodenk. Abh. 21, 193.Google Scholar
  9. Liu, J.C. and Ende, H.P.: 1988,KfK/PEF Berichte 55, 323.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, J.C. and Trüby, P.: 1989,Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 152, 307.Google Scholar
  11. Mies, E. and Zöttl, H.W.: 1985,Forstw. Cbl. 104, 1.Google Scholar
  12. Zeitvogel, W. and Feger, K.-H.: 1990,Allg. Forst- u. Jagd-Zeitg. 161, 136.Google Scholar
  13. Ziegler, H. and Egle, K.: 1965,Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 41, 11.Google Scholar
  14. Zöttl, H.W. and Mies, E.: 1983,Mitt. Dtsch. Bodenkundl. Ges. 38, 429.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. P. Ende
    • 1
  • H. W. Zöttl
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil Science and Forest NutritionAlbert-Ludwigs-UniversityFreiburg i. Br.FRG

Personalised recommendations