Advertisement

The invisible children's project

Key ingredients of an intervention for parents with mental illness
  • Beth R. HindenEmail author
  • Beth R. Hinden
  • Kathleen Biebel
  • Joanne Nicholson
  • Liz Mehnert
Regular Articles

Abstract

This study used a collective case study design to identify key ingredients of the Invisible Children's Project, an intervention program for families in which a parent has a mental illness. Data were obtained from interviews with parents and service providers, and from family file records. Qualitative analyses were used to generate hypotheses regarding key ingredients and targeted outcomes, and to develop a testable intervention model. Key ingredients were defined as core processes, essential services, and mediators. Strong convergence across parents and providers suggested core processes defined by family-centered, strengths-based, emotionally supportive, and comprehensive approaches; essential services including family case management, 24-hour crisis services, access to flexible funds, liaison and advocacy, and mediators reflecting parent-provider trust and communication/cooperation, provider-provider trust, adoption of strengths-based approaches, development of appropriate treatment plans, parent engagement, and parent self-esteem/self-efficacy. A model of the intervention is presented, and results are discussed with respect to research and policy implications.

Keywords

Mental Illness Case Management Intervention Model Strong Convergence Core Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hinden B, Biebel K, Nicholson J, et al.Steps Towards Evidence-based Practices for Parents With Mental Illness and Their Families. Rockville, Md: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nicholson J, Biebel K, Katz-Leavy J, et al. Prevalence of parenthood among adults with severe mental illness. In: Manderscheid RW, Henderson MJ, eds.Mental Health, United States, 2002. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services. In press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mowbray CT, Oyserman D, Zemencuk JK, et al. Motherhood for women with serious mental illness: pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period.Am J Orthopsychiatr. 1995;65:21–38.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hemmens C, Miller M, Burton VS, et al. The consequences of official labels: an examination of the rights lost by the mentally ill and mentally incompetent ten years later.Commun Mental Health J. 2002;38:129–140.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joseph JG, Joshi S, Lewin AB, et al. Characteristics and perceived needs of mothers with serious mental illness.Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:1357–1359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Advocasey Index. Documenting programs that work for kids and families.Advocasey. Winter/Fall 2001;3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parents with serious mental illness.Virginia Child Protection Newsletter. Summer 1999;56:6–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barocas R, Seifer R, Sameroff AJ. Defining environmental risk: multiple dimensions of psychological vulnerability.Am J Commun Psychol. 1985;13:433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oyserman D, Mowbray CT, Meares PA, et al. Parenting among mothers with a serious mental illness.Am J Orthopsychiatr. 2000;70:296–315.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sameroff AJ, Seifer R. Familial risk and child competence.Child Development. 1983;54:1254–1268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weintraub S, Neal JM. Social behavior of children at risk for schizophrenia. In: Watt N, Anthony EJ, Wynne LC, et al, eds.Children at Risk for Schizophrenia: A Longitudinal Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1984:243–263.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ORC Macro.Aggregate Data Profile Report: Grant Communities Funded in 1999 and 2000. Unpublished report; April 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blanch AK, Nicholson J, Purcell J. Parents with severe mental illness and their children: the need for human services integration.J Mental Health Adm. 1994;21:388–396.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nicholson J, Biebel K, Hinden B, et al.Critical Issues for Parents With Mental Illness and Their Families. Rockville, Md: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lieberman HJ, Campanelli PC, Ades Y, et al. Reunifying single-parent families with special needs.Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1999;23:42–46.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohler BJ, Stott FM, Musick J. Distressed parents and their young children: interventions for families at risk. In: Goepfert M, Webster J, eds.Parental Psychiatric Disorder: Distressed Parents and Their Families. Liverpool, England: Liverpool Psychotherapy & Consultation Service; 1996:107–134.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohit DL. Management and care of mentally ill mothers of young children: an innovative program.Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1996;10:49–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stewart DE. Psychiatric admission of mentally ill mothers with their infants.Can JPsychiat. 1989;34:34–38.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hodges S, Hernandez M, Nesman T, et al.Creating Change and Keeping It Real: How Excellent Child-Serving Organizations Carry Out Their Goals. Cross-Site Findings for Phase I Community-based Theories of Change. Tampa, Fla: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health, University of South Florida; 2002.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Musick JS, Clark R, Cohler B. The Mother's Project: a program for mentally ill mothers and their young children. In: Weissbourd B, Musick J, eds.Infants: Their Social Environments. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children; 1981:111–127.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beardslee WR, Gladstone TRG, Wright EJ, Cooper AB. A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.Pediatrics. 2003;112:119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beardslee WR, Wright E, Rothberg PC, Salt P, Versage EM. Response of families to two preventive intervention strategies: long-term differences in behavior and attitude change.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35:774–782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clarke GN, Hornbrook M, Lynch F, et al. A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for prevention of depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:1127–1134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clarke GN, Hawkins W, Murphy M, Sheeber LB. Targeted prevention of unipolar depressive disorder in an at-risk sample of high school students: a randomized trial of group cognitive intervention.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34:312–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoagwood K, Burns BJ, Weisz JR. A profitable conjunction: from science to service in children's mental health. In: Burns BJ, Hoagwood K, eds.Community Treatment for Youth: Evidence-based Interventions for Severe Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weisz JR. Milestones and methods in the development and dissemination of child and adolescent psychotherapies: review, commentary, and a new development-focused model. In: Hibbs ED, Jensen PS, eds.Psychosocial Treatments for Child and Adolescent Disorders: Empirically-Based Approaches. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. In press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stake RE. Case studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds.Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998:86–109.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand; 2003. Available at: http://www.health.auckland.ac.nz/hrmas/resources/qualdatanalysis.html.Accessed February 1, 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koren PE, Paulson RI, Kinney RF, Yatchmenoff DK, Gordon LJ, DeChillo N. Service coordination in children's mental health: an empirical study form the caregiver's perspective.J Emot Behav Disord. 1997;5:162–172.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lourie IS, Stroul BA, Friedman RM. Community-based systems of care: from advocacy to outcomes. In: Epstien MH, Kutash K, Duchnowski A, eds.Outcomes for Children and Youth With Behavioral and Emotional Disorders and Their Families: Programs & Evaluation Best Practices. Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1998:2–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth R. Hinden
    • 1
    Email author
  • Beth R. Hinden
    • 2
  • Kathleen Biebel
    • 3
  • Joanne Nicholson
    • 4
  • Liz Mehnert
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Center for Mental Health Services ResearchUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester
  2. 2.the Department of Psychiatry, Center for Mental Health Services ResearchUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester
  3. 3.the Department of Psychiatry, Center for Mental Health Services ResearchUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester
  4. 4.Psychiatry and Family Medicine in the Department of Psychiatry, Center for Mental Health Services ResearchUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester
  5. 5.Mental Health Association in Orange County, IncGoshen

Personalised recommendations