Advertisement

Philosophia

, Volume 27, Issue 3–4, pp 359–382 | Cite as

Dummett’s argument against classical logic

  • Michaelis Michael
Article
  • 133 Downloads

Keywords

Classical Logic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Belnap, Nuel, “Tonk, Plonk and Plink”, Analysis, 22 (1961–1962): 130–134Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Burgess, John P., “Dummett’s Case for Intuitionism”, History and Philosophy of Logic, (1984): 177–194.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Carnap, Rudolf, “Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages” Appendix D in Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1956)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Craig, Edward, “Meaning, Use and Privacy”, Mind, (1982): 541–564Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dosen, K. and P. Schöder-Heister, “Uniqueness, Definability and Interpolation”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, (1988): 554–570.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Dummett, Michael, Truth and Other Enigmas, Harvard University Press, (1978)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dummett, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Second Edition, Duckworth, (1981)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dummett, The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Harvard University Press, (1991)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dummett, “The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic” in Truth and Other EnigmasGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Dummett, “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathermatics” in Truth and Other EnigmasGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Dummett, “What is a Theory of Meaning? II” in G.Evans and J.McDowell, eds., Truth and Meaning, Oxford, (1976)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    —, The Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, (1977)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Fine, Kit, “Vagueness, Truth and Logic”, Synthese 30, (1975): 265–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Gentzen, Gerhard, “Investigations into Logical Deduction” in M.E.Szabo ed. The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, (1969) North Holland Press.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Grandy, Richard, Review, Journal of Symbolic Logic, (1982): 689–694Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Humberstone, I. Lloyd, “Unique Characterisation of Connectives” abstract in Journal of Symbolic Logic, (1984): 1426–1427Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Lewis, David K., “Extrinsic Properties”, Philosophical Studies, (1983): 197–200Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    McGinn, Colin, “Truth and Use” pp. 19–40 in Mark Platts ed. Reference, Truth and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, (1980)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Overton, H. Lee, “Manifestation: Dummett Misunderstood”, unpublished manuscript, (1989)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Prawitz, Dagfinn, “Dummett on a Theory of Meaning and its Impact on Logic” in Barry Taylor ed. Michael Dummett, Dordrecht (1987): 117–165Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Prior, Arthur N., “The Runabout Inference-Ticket”, Analysis, 21 (1960): 38–39.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Tennant, Neil, Anti-Realism and Logic, Oxford, (1987), p. 111Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philosophia 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michaelis Michael
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations