Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 205–223 | Cite as

The postcranium of Miocene hominoids: Were dryopithecines merely “dental apes”?

  • Robert S. Corruccini
  • Russell L. Ciochon
  • Henry M. McHenry
Article

Abstract

This paper reviews the non-dental morphological configuration of Miocene hominoids with special reference to the hypothesis of linear relationships between certain fossil species and living analogues. Metrical analysis of the wrist shows thatDryopithecus africanus andPliopithecus vindobonensis are unequivocally affiliated with the morphological pattern of quadrupedal monkeys. Similar analyses of the fossil hominoid elbow shows that they are more cercopithecoid-like than hominoid-like. Multivariate analysis of theP. vindobonensis shoulder in the matrix of extant Anthropoidea indicate that this putative hylobatine fossil shows no indication of even the initial development of hominoid features. The total morphological pattern of theD. africanus forelimb as assessed by principal coordinates analysis of allometrically adjusted shape variables has little resemblance toPan. Likewise, the feet and proximal femora of the Miocene fossils are unlike any living hominoid species. Even theD. africanus skull is similar to extant cercopithecoids in several features. Although ancestors cannot be expected to resemble descendants in every way, the striking dissimilarity between Miocene and extant hominoids seems to eliminate the consideration of a direct ancestor-descendant relationship between specific Miocene and modern forms.

Keywords

Special Reference Proximal Femur Animal Ecology Metrical Analysis Shape Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, P., 1973.Miocene Primates (Pongidae, Hylobatidae) of East Africa. Doctoral thesis, St. Edmund's College, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  2. ————, 1974. New species ofDryopithecus from Kenya.Nature, 249: 188–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankel, F., 1965. Der Canalis sacralis als Indikator für die Länge der Caudalregion der Primaten.Folia primat., 3: 263–276.Google Scholar
  4. Bilsborough, A., 1971. Evolutionary change in the hominoid maxilla.Man, 6: 473–485.Google Scholar
  5. Cartmill, M. &K. Milton, 1974. The lorisiform wrist joint.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 41: 471.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, W. E. Le Gros &L. S. B. Leakey, 1951. The Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa.Fossil Mammals of Africa, 1: 1–117, British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
  7. Ciochon, R. & R. S. Corruccini, in prep, a. Morphometric affinities of primate shoulders.Google Scholar
  8. ---- & ----, in prep, b. The shoulder joint ofPliopithecus.Google Scholar
  9. Conroy, G. C. &J. Fleagle, 1972. Locomotor behavior in fossil and living pongids.Nature, 227: 103–104.Google Scholar
  10. Corruccini, R. S., 1975. Multivariate analysis in biological anthropology: Some considerations.J. Hum. Evol., 4: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ---- &R. L. Ciochon, in press. Morphometric affinities of the human shoulder.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop.Google Scholar
  12. ----, ----, &H. M. McHenry, in press. Osteometric shape relationships in the wrist joint of some anthropoids.Folia primat., 24: 250–274.Google Scholar
  13. ----,H. M. McHenry, & R. Ciochon, in prep. The wrist joint ofDryopithecus africanus.Google Scholar
  14. Day, M. H. &B. A. Wood, 1968. Functional affinities of the Olduvai Hominid 8 talus.Man, 3: 440–445.Google Scholar
  15. ————, 1969. Hominoid tali from East Africa.Nature, 222: 591–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Delson, E., 1974. The oldest known fossil Cercopithecidae.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 41: 474–475.Google Scholar
  17. Goodman, M. &G. W. Lasker, 1975. Molecular evidence as to man's place in nature, In:Primate Functional Morphology and Evolution,R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  18. Gregory, W. K. &M. Hellman, 1926. The dentition ofDryopithecus and the origin of man.Anthrop. Papers Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 28: 1–123.Google Scholar
  19. ————, ————, &G. E. Lewis, 1938. Fossil anthropoids of the Yale-Cambridge Indian expedition of 1935.Carnegie Institution, Washington, 495: 1–27.Google Scholar
  20. Groves, C. P., 1971. Distribution and place of origin of the gorilla.Man, 6: 44–51.Google Scholar
  21. Hopwood, A. T., 1933. Miocene primates from Kenya.Linn. Soc. (Zoo.), 38: 437–464.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, O. J., 1969. The hominoid wrist joint.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 30: 251–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. ————, 1971a. Brachiation and the early evolution of the Hominoidae.Nature, 230: 577–578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. ————, 1971b. The contrasting morphology found in the wrist joints of semi-brachiating monkeys and brachiating apes.Folia. primat., 15: 248–256.Google Scholar
  25. ————, 1972a. Osteological features characterizing the wrists of monkeys and apes with a reconsideration of this region inDryopithecus (Proconsul) africanus.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 36: 45–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. ————, 1972b. Evolution of the hominoid wrist joint, In:The Functional and Evolutionary Biology of Primates,R. H. Tuttle, (ed.), Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp. 207–222.Google Scholar
  27. ————, 1972c. The evolution of the hallucial tarsometatarsal joint in the Anthropoidea.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 37: 13–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. ————, 1974. The wrist articulations of the Anthropoidea. In:Primate Locomotion,F. A. Jenkins,Jr. (ed.), pp. 143–169, Academic press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Lovejoy, C. O. &R. S. Meindl, 1972. Eukaryote mutation and the protein clock.Yearb. Phys. Anthrop., 16: 18–30.Google Scholar
  30. McHenry, H. M. &R. S. Corruccini, 1975. Distal humerus in hominoid evolution.Folia primat. 23: 227–244.Google Scholar
  31. ----, in press. Affinities of Tertiary hominoid femora.Folia primat.Google Scholar
  32. Morbeck, M. E., 1972.A Re-examination of the Forelimb of the Miocene Hominoidea. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  33. ----, 1975.Dryopithecus africanus forelimb.J. Hum. Evol. 3.Google Scholar
  34. Napier, J. R., 1964. The evolution of bipedal walking in the hominids.Arch. Biol. (Liége), 75 (Suppl.): 673–708.Google Scholar
  35. ————, 1967. Evolutionary aspects of primate locomotion.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 27: 333–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. ————, 1974. Book review:The Functional and Evolutionary Biology of Primates,R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 41: 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Napier, J. R., &P. R. Davis, 1959. The forelimb skeleton and associated remains ofProconsul africanus.Fossil Mammals of Africa, 16: 1–70. British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
  38. O'Connor, B., 1974. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  39. Oxnard, C. E., 1972. Some African fossil foot bones: A note on the interpolation of fossils into a matrix of extant species.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 37: 3–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pilbeam, D. R., 1969a. Tertiary Pongidae of East Africa: Evolutionary relationships and taxonomy.Peabody Museum Natural History, Yale University, Bulletin, 31: 1–185.Google Scholar
  41. ————, 1969b. Possible identity of Miocene tali from Kenya.Nature, 223: 648.Google Scholar
  42. ———— &E. L. Simons, 1971. Humerus ofDryopithecus from Saint Gaudens, France.Nature, 229: 408–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pilgrim, G. E., 1915. New Siwalik primates and their bearing on the question of the evolution of man and the Anthropoidea.Records of the Geological Survey of India, 45: 1–74.Google Scholar
  44. Preuschoft, H., 1973. Body posture and locomotion in some East African Miocene Dryopithecinae.Symposia of the Society for the Study of Human Biology, XI: 13–46.Google Scholar
  45. Sarich, V. M., 1971. A molecular approach to the question of human origins, In:Gackground for Man,V. M. Sarich &P. Dolhinow (eds.), Little Brown, Boston, pp. 60–81.Google Scholar
  46. ————, 1973. Just how old is the hominid line?Yearb. Phys. Anthrop., 17: 98–112.Google Scholar
  47. Schön, M. A. &L. K. Ziemer, 1973. Wrist mechanism and locomotor behavior ofDryopithecus (Proconsul) africanus.Folia primat., 20: 1–11.Google Scholar
  48. Schultz, A. H., 1930. The skeleton of the trunk and limbs of higher primates.Hum. Biol., 2: 303–438.Google Scholar
  49. ————, 1936. Characters common to higher primates and characters specific for man.Quart. Rev. Biol., 11: 259–283, 425–455.Google Scholar
  50. ————, 1950. The physical distinctions of man.Proc. Phil. Soc., 94: 428–449.Google Scholar
  51. ————, 1951. The specializations of man and his place among the catarrhine primates.Cold Springs Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 15: 37–52.Google Scholar
  52. ————, 1953. Man's place among the primates.Man, 53: 7–9.Google Scholar
  53. ————, 1963. Age changes, sex differences, and variability as factors in the classification of primates, In:Classification and Human Evolution,S. L. Washburn (ed.), pp. 85–115, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  54. Simons, E. L., 1963a. A critical reappraisal of Tertiary primates. In:Genetic and Evolutionary Biology of the Primates,J. Buettner-Janusch, Academic press, New York, pp. 65–129.Google Scholar
  55. ————, 1963b. Some fallacies in the study of hominid phylogeny.Proc. 16th Int. Cong. Zool., 4: 25–70.Google Scholar
  56. ————, 1964a. Old World higher primates: Classification and taxonomy.Sci. Rev., 144: 709–710.Google Scholar
  57. ————, 1964b. The early relatives of man.Sci. Amer., 211: 50–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. ————, 1967a. Fossil primates and the evolution of some primate locomotor systems.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 26: 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ————, 1967b. The significance of primate paleontology for anthropological studies.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 27: 307–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. ————, 1968. A source for dental comparison ofRamapithecus withAustralopithecus andHomo.South Afr. J. Sci., 64: 92–112.Google Scholar
  61. ————, 1972.Primate Evolution. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  62. ————, &J. Fleagle, 1973. The history of extinct gibbon-like primates. In:Gibbon and Siamang, Vol. 2,D. M. Rumbaugh (ed.), Karger, Basel, pp. 121–148.Google Scholar
  63. ———— &D. R. Pilbeam, 1965. Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae, Anthropoidea).Folia primat., 3: 81–152.Google Scholar
  64. ————, ————, &P. C. Ettel, 1969. Controversial taxonomy of fossil hominids.Science, 166: 258–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Simpson, G. G., 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of the mammals.Bull Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 85: 1–350.Google Scholar
  66. Tuttle, R. H., 1967. Knuckle-walking and the evolution of hominoid hands.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 26: 171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. ————, 1969. Quantitative and functional studies on the hands of the Anthropoidea, I. The Hominoidea.J. Morphol., 128: 309–364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. ————, 1970. Postural, propulsive, and prehensile capabilities in the cheiridia of chimpanzees and other great apes. In:The Chimpanzee, Vol. 2,G. Bourne (ed.), Karger, Basel, pp. 167–253.Google Scholar
  69. ———— &J. V. Basmajian, 1974. Electromyography of brachial muscles inPan gorilla and hominoid evolution.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 41: 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Uzzell, T. &D. R. Pilbeam, 1971. Phyletic divergence dates of hominoid primates: A comparison of fossil and molecular data.Evolution, 25: 615–635.Google Scholar
  71. von Koenigswald, G. H. R., 1968. The phylogenetical position of the Hylobatidae. In:Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Old World Primates with References to the Origin of Man,A. B. Chiarelli (ed.), Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino.Google Scholar
  72. ————, 1969. Miocene Cercopithecoidea and Oreopithecoidea from Miocene of East Africa.Fossil Vertebrates of Africa, 1: 39–52.Google Scholar
  73. ————, 1973. The position ofProconsul among the pongids.Symp. 4th Int. Cong. Primat., 3: 148–153.Google Scholar
  74. Washburn, S. L., 1963. Behavior and human evolution, In:Classification and Human Evolution,S. L. Washburn (ed.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 190–203.Google Scholar
  75. ————, 1968.The Study of Human Evolution. University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.Google Scholar
  76. ————, 1972. Human evolution.Evol. Biol., 6: 349–361.Google Scholar
  77. ———— &R. Moore, 1974.Ape into Man. Little Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  78. Wood, B. A., 1974. Locomotor affinities of hominoid tali from Kenya.Nature, 246: 45–46.Google Scholar
  79. Zapfe, H., 1958. The skeleton ofPliopithecus (Epipliopithecus vindobonensis) Zapfe and Hürzeler.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 16: 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. ————, 1960. Die Primatenfunde aus der miozänen Spaltenfüllung von Neudorf an der March (Děvinská Nová Ves), Tschechoslowakei. Mit Anhang: Der Primatenfund aus dem Miozän von Klein Hadersdorf in Niederoesterreich.Schweizerische Palaeontologische Abhandlungen, 78: 4–293.Google Scholar
  81. Zwell, M., &G. C. Conroy, 1973. Multivariate analysis of theDryopithecus africanus forelimb.Nature, 244: 373–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert S. Corruccini
    • 1
  • Russell L. Ciochon
    • 2
  • Henry M. McHenry
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Physical AnthropologySmithsonian InstitutionWashington, D.C.U S A
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyU S A
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of California, DavisDavisU S A

Personalised recommendations