Primates

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 333–342 | Cite as

Tonic immobility in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)

  • Charles W. Hennig
Article

Abstract

Tonic immobility and several accompanying behavioral changes were examined in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). It was found that either the occurrence of a loud noise immediately before induction or the presence of a stuffed Cooper's hawk increased the duration of immobility in some subjects. Subspecies differences in durations of immobility were also found. The number of inductions required to produce immobility in squirrel monkeys were unusually large, and were negatively correlated with duration of the response. Behavioral variables accompanying tonic immobility showed qualitative differences when compared to what is known concerning their relation to immobility in other species. The findings support the belief that tonic immobility evolved as a predator defense in squirrel monkeys or one of their ancestors, but suggest that it no longer plays an active role in their survival.

Keywords

Behavioral Change Active Role Animal Ecology Qualitative Difference Squirrel Monkey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bresnahan, J. L. &M. M. Shapiro, 1966. A general equation and technique for the exact partitioning of chi-square contingency tables.Psych. Bull., 66: 252–262.Google Scholar
  2. Claparde, M. E., 1911. Observations sur un etat hypnoide chez un singe.Arch. Sci. Physiques et Naturelles, 32: 161.Google Scholar
  3. Edson, P. H. &G. G. Gallup, Jr., 1972. Tonic immobility as a fear response in lizards (Anolis carolinensis).Psychon. Sci., 26: 27–28.Google Scholar
  4. Foley, J. P., 1938. Tonic immobility in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) induced by manipulation, immobilization, and experimental inversion of the visual field.J. Comp. Psych., 26: 515–526.Google Scholar
  5. Gallup, G. G., Jr., 1973. Simulated predation and tonic immobility inAnolis carolinensis.Copeia, 3: 623–624.Google Scholar
  6. ————, 1974. Animal hypnosis: Factual status of a fictional concept.Psych. Bull., 81: 836–853.Google Scholar
  7. ————,R. F. Nash, N. H. Donegan, &M. K. McClure, 1971. The immobility response: A predation-induced reaction in chickens.Psych. Record, 21: 513–519.Google Scholar
  8. ————, ————,R. J. Potter, &N. H. Donegan, 1970. Effects of varying conditions of fear on immobility reactions in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus).J. Comp. Physio. Psych., 73: 442–445.Google Scholar
  9. ————, ————, &A. M. Wagner, 1971. The tonic immobility reaction in chickens: Response characteristics and methodology.Behav. Research Meth. Instrum., 3: 237–239.Google Scholar
  10. Nash, R. F., G. G. Gallup, Jr., &D. A. Czech, 1976. Psycho-physiological correlates of tonic immobility in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).Physiol. & Behav., 17: 413–418.Google Scholar
  11. ————, ————, &M. K. McClure, 1970. The immobility reaction in leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) as a function of noise-induced fear.Psychon. Sci., 21: 155–156.Google Scholar
  12. Prestrude, A. M. &F. T. Crawford, 1970. Tonic immobility in the lizard,Iguana iguana.Anim. Behav., 18: 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ratner, S. C., 1967. Comparative aspects of hypnosis. In:Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,J. E. Gordon (ed.), Macmillan, New York, pp. 550–587.Google Scholar
  14. Ruckmick, C. A., 1936.The Psychology of Feeling and Emotions. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Thorington, R. W., Jr., 1968. Observations on squirrel monkeys in a Colombian forest. In:The Squirrel Monkey,R. W. Cooper &L. A. Rosenblum (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
  16. Volgyesi, F. A., 1966.Hypnosis of Men and Animals. (2nd Ed.), Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  17. Wendt, G. R., 1936. An interpretation of inhibition of conditioned reflexes as competition between reaction systems.Psych. Review, 43: 258–281.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles W. Hennig
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTulane UniversityNew OrleansU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations