Primates

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 163–197 | Cite as

Infanticide among free-ranging langurs (Presbytis entellus) at jodhpur (Rajasthan/India): Recent observations and a reconsideration of hypotheses

  • Volker Sommer
Article

Abstract

Considerable disagreement characterizes the debate concerning frequency, causation, and function of infanticide in connection with adult male replacements in bisexual one-male troops of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus). Detailed observations are presented about two noninfanticidal and three infanticidal male changes including six eye-witness and five presumed cases of infanticide within three langur troops during a long-term study at Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. The results do not support any explanatory hypotheses focussing on social crowding, regulation of population density, social stress, sexual frustration, incest avoidance, or social bonding, but are in general though not total agreement with the reproductive advantage hypothesis: mainly unrelated infants were killed (one possible exception), the infanticidal male generally sired the subsequent offspring (one exception), and the mean interbirth interval subsequent to infanticide is by 2.1 months shortened. Likewise, several cases of stress induced abortions occurred. It is demonstrated that postconception estrous behaviour is by no means a female counterstrategy to infanticide in order to confuse males concerning the issue of paternity, since an infanticidal male did not spare the subsequent offspring of mothers who copulated with him during pregnancy and pregnant females did not discriminate between fathers and non-fathers.

Key Words

Presbytis entellus Infanticide Reproductive strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agoramoorthy, G., 1986. Recent observations on 12 cases of infanticide in Hanuman langur,Presbytis entellus, around Jodhpur, India.Abstr. XIth Congr. Int. Primatol. Soc., July 20–25, 1986 at Göttingen,Prim. Rep., 14: 209–210.Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, J., 1979.Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Angst, W. &D. Thommen, 1977. New data and a discussion of infant-killing in Old World monkeys and apes.Folia Primatol., 27: 198–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barash, D. P., 1980.Sociobiology and Behavior. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, J., 1983. Induced abortion and social factors in wild horses.Nature, 303: 59–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop, N., 1975. Social behavior of langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus) in a high altitude environment. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Boggess, J. E., 1976. Social behavior of the Himalayan langur (Presbytis entellus) in eastern Nepal. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  8. —, 1979. Troop male membership changes and infant killing in langurs (Presbytis entellus).Folia Primatol., 32: 65–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. —, 1980. Intermale relations and troop male membership changes in langurs (Presbytis entellus) in Nepal.Int. J. Primatol., 1: 233–274.Google Scholar
  10. —, 1984. Infant killing and male reproductive strategies in langurs (Presbytis entellus). In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 283–310.Google Scholar
  11. Bruce, H. M., 1960. A block to pregnancy in the house mouse caused by the proximity of strange males.J. Reprod. Fertil., 1: 96–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Butynski, T. M., 1982. Harem-male replacement and infanticide in the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni) in the Kibale forest, Uganda.Amer. J. Primatol., 3: 1–22.Google Scholar
  13. Chalmers, N., 1986. Book Review:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives, edited byG. Hausfater & S. B. Hrdy.Int. J. Primatol., 7: 327–329.Google Scholar
  14. Crockett, C. &R. Sekulic, 1984. Infanticide in red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus). In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 173–192.Google Scholar
  15. Curtin, R. A., 1977. Langur social behavior and infant mortality.Kroeber Anthropol. Soc. Pap., 50: 27–36.Google Scholar
  16. — &P. Dolhinow, 1978. Primate social behavior in a changing world.Amer. Scientist, 66: 468–475.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1979. Infanticide among langurs—a solution to overcrowding?Science Today, 13: 35–41.Google Scholar
  18. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., 1984.Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens—Grundriβ der Humanethologie. Piper, München.Google Scholar
  19. Fossey, D., 1984. Infanticide in mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei) with comparative notes on chimpanzees. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 217–236.Google Scholar
  20. Hausfater, G., 1984. Infanticide in langurs: strategies, counter-strategies, and parameter values. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 257–282.Google Scholar
  21. —,S. Aref, &S. J. Cairns, 1982. Infanticide as an alternative male reproductive strategy in langurs: a mathematical model.J. Theor. Biol., 94: 391–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. — &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), 1984.Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives. Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  23. — &C. Vogel, 1982. Infanticide in langur monkeys (genusPresbytis): recent research and a review of hypotheses. In:Advanced Views in Primate Biology,A. B. Chiarelli &R. S. Corruccini (eds.), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 160–176.Google Scholar
  24. Hrdy, S. B., 1974. Male-male competition and infanticide among the langurs (Presbytis entellus) of Abu, Rajasthan.Folia Primatol., 22: 19–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. —, 1977.The Langurs of Abu. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, London.Google Scholar
  26. —, 1979. Infanticide among animals: a review, classification and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females.J. Ethol. Sociobiol., 1: 13–40.Google Scholar
  27. —, 1982. Positivist thinking encounters field primatology, resulting in agonistic behavior.Soc. Sci. Inform., 21: 245–250.Google Scholar
  28. Itani, J., 1972. A preliminary essay on the relationships between social organization and incest avoidance in nonhuman primates. In:Primate Socialization,F. E. Poirier (ed.), Random House, New York, pp. 165–171.Google Scholar
  29. —, 1982. Intraspecific killing among non-human primates.J. Soc. Biol. Struct., 5: 361–368.Google Scholar
  30. Jay, P., 1965. The common langur of north India. In:Primate Behavior—Field Studies on Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 197–249.Google Scholar
  31. Labov, J. B., 1984. Infanticidal behavior in male and female rodents: Sectional introduction and directions for future research. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 323–330.Google Scholar
  32. Laws, J. V. H. &J. Laws, 1984. Social interactions among adult male langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Rajaji Wildlife Sanctuary.Int. J. Primatol., 5: 31–50.Google Scholar
  33. Leland, L., T. T. Struhsaker, &T. M. Butynski, 1984. Infanticide by adult males in three primate species of the Kibale Forest, Uganda: a test of hypotheses. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
  34. Makwana, S. C., 1979. Infanticide and social change in two groups of the hanuman langur,Presbytis entellus, at Jodhpur.Primates, 20: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maynard-Smith, J., 1974. The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts.J. Theor. Biol., 47: 209–221.Google Scholar
  36. Mohnot, S. M., 1971. Some aspects of social changes and infant-killing in the Hanuman langur,Presbytis entellus (Primates: Cercopithecidae), in western India.Mammalia, 35: 175–198.Google Scholar
  37. —,G. Agoramoorthy, &L. S. Rajpurohit, 1986. Male takeovers inducing abortions in Hanuman langur,Presbytis entellus. Abstr. XIth Congr. Int. Primatol. Soc., July 20–25, 1986 at Göttingen,Prim. Rep., 14: 208.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, J., 1983. Where the boys are: Females in langur all-male-bands. Paper presented atAnn. Meet. Anim. Behav. Soc., Lewisburg, PA.Google Scholar
  39. Muckenhirn, N. A., 1972. Leaf-eaters and their predators in Ceylon: ecological roles of gray langurs,Presbytis entellus, and leopards. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Maryland.Google Scholar
  40. Newton, P. N., 1985. The behavioural ecology of forest hanuman langurs.Tigerpaper, XII (3): 3–7.Google Scholar
  41. —, 1986. Infanticide in undisturbed forest population of hanuman langurs,Presbytis entellus.Anim. Behav., 34: 785–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oppenheimer, J. R., 1977.Presbytis entellus: the Hanuman langur. In:Primate Conservation,HSH Prince Rainier III of Monaco &G. H. Bourne (eds.), Academic Press, New York, San Francisco & London, pp. 469–512.Google Scholar
  43. Packer, C. &A. E. Pusey, 1984. Infanticide in carnivores. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
  44. Parthasarathy, M. D. & H. Rahaman, 1974. Infant-killing and dominance assertion among the Hanuman langur.Abstr. Vth Congr. Int. Primatol. Soc., August 21–24, 1974 at Nagoya, Japan, p. 35.Google Scholar
  45. Pereira, M. E., 1983. Abortion following the immigration of an adult male baboon (Papio cynocephalus).Amer. J. Primatol., 4: 93–98.Google Scholar
  46. Ramaswami, L. S., 1975. Some aspects of the reproductive biology of the langur monkeyPresbytis entellus entellus Dufresne.Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad., B41: 1–30.Google Scholar
  47. Rijksen, H. D., 1981. Infant killing, a possible consequence of a disputed leader role.Behaviour, 78: 138–167.Google Scholar
  48. Ripley, S., 1967. Intertroop encounters among Ceylon gray langurs (Presbytis entellus) In:Social Communication among Primates,J. Altmann (ed.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  49. —, 1979. Environmental grain, niche diversification, and positional behavior in neogene primates: an evolutionary hypothesis. In:Environment, Behavior, and Morphology; Dynamic Interactions in Primates,M. E. Morbeck,H. Preuschoft, &N. Gomberg (eds.), G. Fischer, New York, pp. 37–74.Google Scholar
  50. —, 1980. Infanticide in langurs and man: Adaptive advantage or social pathology? In:Biosocial Mechanisms of Population Regulation,M. N. Cohen,R. S. Malpass, &H. G. Klein (eds.), Yale Univ. Press, New Haven & London, pp. 349–390.Google Scholar
  51. Rudran, R., 1973. Adult male replacement in one-male troops of purple-faced langurs (Presbytis senex senex) and its effect on population structure.Folia Primatol., 19: 166–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. —, 1979. The demography and social mobility of a red howler (Alouatta seniculus) population in Venezuela. In:Vertebrate Ecology in the Northern Neotropics,J. F. Eisenberg (ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
  53. Schubert, G., 1982. Infanticide by usurper hanuman langur males: A sociobiological myth.Soc. Sci. Inf., 21: 199–244.Google Scholar
  54. Sommer, V., 1985. Weibliche und männliche Reproduktionsstrategien der Hanuman-Languren (Presbytis entellus) von Jodhpur, Rajasthan/Indien. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Göttingen.Google Scholar
  55. — &S. M. Mohnot, 1985. New observations on infanticides among hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) near Jodhpur (Rajasthan/India).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 16: 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Struhsaker, T. T. &L. Leland, 1985. Infanticide in a patrilineal society of red colobus monkeys.Z. Tierpsychol., 69: 89–132.Google Scholar
  57. Sugiyama, Y., 1965a. Behavioral development and social structure in two troops of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primates, 6: 213–247.Google Scholar
  58. —, 1965b. On the social change of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) in their natural condition.Primates, 6: 381–418.Google Scholar
  59. —, 1966. An artificial social change in a hanuman langur troop (Presbytis entellus).Primates, 7: 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. —, 1984a. Proximate factors of infanticide among langurs at Dharwar: a reply toBoggess. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 311–314.Google Scholar
  61. —, 1984b. Some aspects of infanticide and intermale competition among langurs,Presbytis entellus, at Dharwar, India.Primates, 25: 423–432.Google Scholar
  62. — &M. D. Parthasarathy, 1979. Population change of the Hanuman langur (Presbytis entellus), 1961–1976, in Dharwar area, India,J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 75: 860–867.Google Scholar
  63. —,K. Yoshiba, &M. D. Parthasarathy, 1965. Home range, mating season, male group and inter-troop relations in Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primates, 6: 73–106.Google Scholar
  64. Trivers, R., 1985.Social Evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
  65. Vogel, C., 1973. Acoustical communication among free-ranging common Indian langurs (Presbytis entellus) in two different habitats of north India.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 38: 469–480.Google Scholar
  66. ----, 1976.Ökologie, Lebensweise und Sozialverhalten der grauen Languren in verschiedenen Biotopen Indiens. Fortschr. Verhaltensforschung, Beihefte Zeitschr. Tierpsychol., 17, Paul Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
  67. —, 1977. Ecology and sociology ofPresbytis entellus. In:Use of Non-human Primates in Biomedical Research,M. R. D. Prasad &T. C. Anand Kumar (eds.), Indian Nat. Sci. Acad., New Delhi, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
  68. —, 1979. Der Hanuman Langur (Presbytis entellus), ein Parade-Exempel für die theoretischen Konzepte der Soziobiologie? In:Verhandl. Dt. Zool. Gesellsch.,W. Rathmayer (ed.), G. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 73–89.Google Scholar
  69. — &H. Loch, 1984. Reproductive parameters, adult male replacements, and infanticide among free ranging langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 237–255.Google Scholar
  70. vom Saal, F. S., 1984. Proximate and ultimate causes of infanticide and parental behavior in male house mice. In:Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives,G. Hausfater &S. B. Hrdy (eds.), Aldine, New York, pp. 401–425.Google Scholar
  71. Wickler, W. &U. Seibt, 1977.Das Prinzip Eigennutz—Ursachen und Konsequenzen sozialen Verhaltens. Hoffmann & Campe, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  72. Winkler, P., 1981. Zur Öko-Ethologie freilebender Hanuman-Languren (Presbytis entellus entellus Dufresne, 1797) in Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Göttingen.Google Scholar
  73. —,H. Loch, &C. Vogel, 1984. Life history of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus). Reproductive parameters, infant mortality, and troop development.Folia Primatol., 43: 1–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Yoshiba, K., 1968. Local and intertroop variability in ecology and social behavior of common Indian langurs. In:Primates,P. C. Jay (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 217–242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Sommer
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität GöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of JodhpurJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations