Philosophia

, Volume 21, Issue 1–2, pp 31–51

On paradoxes and a surprise exam

  • Richard L. Kirkham
Series: On “Error”

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ayer, A.J. (1973) “On a Supposed Antnomy”,Mind 82: 125–6.Google Scholar
  2. Binkley R. (1968) “The Surprise Examination in Modal Logic”,Journal of Philosophy 65: 127–136.Google Scholar
  3. Bunch, B. (1982)Mathematical Fallacies and Paradoxes New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  4. Cargile, J. (1979)Paradoxes Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, J.M. & Butler, R.J. (1965) “On Quine's “So-Called Paradox'”.Mind 74: 424–425.Google Scholar
  6. Cherniak, C. (1986)Minimal Rationality Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chihara, C.S. (1985) “Olin, Quine, and the Surprise Examination”,Philosophical Studies 47: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guiasu, S. (1987) “Prediction Paradox Revisited”,Logique et Analyse 30: 147–154.Google Scholar
  9. Halpern, J.Y & Moses Y. (1986) “Taken By Surprise: The Paradox of the Surprise Test Revisited”,Journal of Philosophical Logic 15: 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holtzman, J.M. (1987) “An Undecidable Aspect of the Unexpected Hanging Problem”,Philosophia 17: 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hughes, P. & G. Brecht (1975)Vicious Circles and Infinity: An Anthology of Paradoxes Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Kirkham, R.L. (1986). “The Two Paradoxes of the Unexpected Examination”,Philosophical Studies 49: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kvart, I. (1978) “The Paradox of Surprise Examination”,Logique et Analyse 21: 337–344.Google Scholar
  14. Lyon, A. (1959) “The Prediction Paradox”,Mind 68: 510–517.Google Scholar
  15. Margalit A. & M. Bar-Hillel (1983) “Expecting the Unexpected”,Philosophia 13: 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McLelland, J. (1971) “Epistemic Logic and the Paradox of the Surprise Examination”,International Logic Review 3: 69–85.Google Scholar
  17. McLelland J. and C. Chihara (1975) “The Surprise Examination Paradox”,Journal of Philosophical Logic 4: 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Medlin, B. (1964) “The Unexpected Examination”,American Philosophical Quarterly 1: 66–72.Google Scholar
  19. O'Carroll, M.J. (1967) “Improper Self-Reference in Classical Logic and the Prediction Paradox”,Logique et Analyse 10: 167–172.Google Scholar
  20. O'Conner, D.J. (1948) “Pragmatic Paradoxes”,Mind 57: 358–359.Google Scholar
  21. Olin, D. (1982) “The Prediction Paradox Resolved”,Philosophical Studies 44: 225–233.Google Scholar
  22. — (1986) “The Prediction Paradox: Resolving Recalcitrant Variations”,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. — (1988) “Predictions, Intentions and the Prisoner's Dilemma”,Philosophical Quarterly 38: 111–116.Google Scholar
  24. Quine, W. V. O. (1962) “The Ways of Paradox”, in Quine's (1976)The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays Rev. Ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
  25. Russell, B. (1908) “Mathematical Logic as Based on a theory of Types”, in Russell's (1956)Logic and Knowledge New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 59–102.Google Scholar
  26. Sainsbury, R.M. (1988)Paradoxes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schoenberg, J. (1966) “A Note on the Logical Fallacy in the Paradox of the Unexpected Examination”,Mind 75: 125–127.Google Scholar
  28. Scriven, M. (1951) “Paradoxical Announcements”,Mind 60: 403–407.Google Scholar
  29. Sharpe, R.A. (1965) “The Unexpected Examination”,Mind 74: 255.Google Scholar
  30. Shaw, R. (1958) “The Unexpected Examination”,Mind 67: 382–384.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, J.W. (1984) “The Surprise Examination and the Paradox of the Heap”,Philosophical Papers 13: 43–56.Google Scholar
  32. Sorensen, R.A. (1982) “Recalcitrant Variations of the Prediction Paradox”,Australasian Journal of Philosphy 60: 355–362.Google Scholar
  33. — (1983) “Conditional Bindspots and the Knowledge Squeeze: A Solution to the Prediction Paradox”,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 126–135.Google Scholar
  34. — (1986a) “The Bottle Imp and the Prediction Paradox”,Philosophia 15: 421–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. — (1986b) “A Strengthened Prediction Paradox”,Philosophical Quarterly 36: 504–513.Google Scholar
  36. — (1986c) “Blindspotting and Choice Variations of the Prediction Paradox”,American Philosophical Quarterly 36: 337–352.Google Scholar
  37. — (1987) “The Bottle Imp and the Predictin Paradox, II”,Philosophia 17: 351–354.Google Scholar
  38. — (1988)Blindspots Oxford: Clarendon. Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wreem, M.J. (1983) “Surprising, the Examiner”,Logique et Analyse 26: 177–190.Google Scholar
  40. — (1986) “Passing the Bottle”,Philosophia 15: 427–444.Google Scholar
  41. Wright, C. & A. Sudbury (1977) “The Paradox of the Unexpected Examination”,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55:41–58.Google Scholar
  42. Wright, J.A., (1967) “The Surprise Exam: Prediction on the Last Day Uncertain”,Mind 76: 115–117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philosophia 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Kirkham
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations